employee
Russian Federation
The article explains the idea of interpretation and concretization of law as the creative content of judicial practice. It contains a review of the main positions of national legal science on the content, forms and significance of judicial practice. The author deals with the issues relating to possibilities of recognition of the court practice as an independent source of law. The legal nature of the judicial act contains the assessment of the subject of it’s regulatory novelty. Subject to analysis is the impact of judicial practice on law-making in modern conditions in the form of drafting in the process of interpretation and concretization of law an abstract rules, which may obtain further its legislative development in the rules of law. The idea of the creative content of judicial practice is based on the legal uncertainty which determines the creative nature of interpretation and concretization of law by judicial organs and the regulatory character of the results of interpretation and concretization of law. The process of interpretation of law is presented sequentially in three stages: understanding, clarification and development. The creative nature is inherent in the results of the judicial practice which generated at the stage of development of rules of law. The authors examines concretization of law which is performed by judicial organs (concretization of rules of law of general character; concretization of concepts contained in rule of law (terminological enforcement concretization); concretization of rules of law in the presence of gaps in normative legal acts). The analysis of the creative character of interpretation and concretization of rules of law in judicial practice emphasizes general and special characteristics thereof.
law, rule of law, source of law, concretization of law, interpretation of law, law enforcement, evolution of law, development of law, court, judicial practice.
1. Anishina V. I. Pravovaya priroda aktov sudebnogo pravotvorchestva. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 10.
2. Baranov V. M., Lazarev V. V. Konkretizatsiya prava: ponyatie i predely. Konkretizatsiya zakonodatel´stva kak tekhniko-yuridicheskiy priem normotvorcheskoy, interpretatsionnoy, pravoprimenitel´noy praktiki: mater. Mezhdunar. simpoziuma (Gelendzhik, 27-28 sent. 2007 g.) / pod red. V. M. Baranova. N. Novgorod, 2008.
3. Bezina A., Lazarev V. Konkretizatsiya prava v sudebnoy praktike. Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1968. № 2.
4. Vas´kovskiy E. V. Tsivilisticheskaya metodologiya: uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskikh mekhanizmov. M., 2002.
5. Vengerov A. B. Rol´ sudebnoy praktiki v razvitii sovetskogo prava: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1965.
6. Vitruk N. V. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie, priroda, yuridicheskaya sila i znachenie. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie. 1999. № 3.
7. Vlasenko N. A. Zakonodatel´naya tekhnologiya (Teoriya. Opyt. Pravila): ucheb. posobie. Irkutsk, 2001.
8. Vlasenko N. A. Konkretizatsiya v prave: metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 7.
9. Vlasenko N. A. Osnovy zakonodatel´noy tekhniki: prakt. rukovodstvo. Irkutsk, 1995.
10. Vlasenko N. A. Pravovaya priroda, vidy i ponyatie pravovykh pozitsiy suda. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2008. № 9.
11. Vlasenko N. A. Pravovye pozitsii: ponyatie i vidy. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 12.
12. Voplenko N. N. Ofitsial´noe tolkovanie norm prava. M., 1976.
13. Gavrilov D. A. Pravoprimenitel´noe tolkovanie: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2000.
14. Gadzhiev G. A. Fenomen sudebnogo pretsedenta v Rossii. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 2000.
15. Grineva A. V. Sudebnye pravovye pozitsii. Teoreticheskie voprosy: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
16. Guk P. A. Sudebnyy pretsedent kak istochnik prava. Penza, 2003.
17. Gurova T. V. Sudebnyy pretsedent kak formal´nyy istochnik prava i ego mesto v sisteme istochnikov prava v Rossii. Atrium. 1997. № 3.
18. Zhuykov V. M. K voprosu o sudebnoy praktike kak istochnike prava. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 2000.
19. Zaloilo M. V. Ponyatie i vidy pravorealizatsionnoy konkretizatsii yuridicheskikh norm. Advokat. 2011. № 11.
20. Zaloilo M. V. Ponyatie i formy konkretizatsii yuridicheskikh norm: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011.
21. Zaloilo M. V. Pravoprimenitel´naya konkretizatsiya yuridicheskikh norm. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 8.
22. Zaloilo M. V. Predely i tekhnika konkretizatsii yuridicheskikh norm v pravotvorchestve. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 11.
23. Zaloilo M. V., Ibragimova Yu. E. Sovremennye problemy tolkovaniya prava. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2016. № 8.
24. Zaloilo M. V., Malyutin N. S. Tolkovanie i konkretizatsiya kak universal´nye formy evolyutsii prava. Aktual´nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 4.
25. Kazhlaev S. A. Sposoby universalizatsii pravovykh pozitsiy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2008. № 1.
26. Lazarev V. V. Pravopolozheniya: ponyatie, proiskhozhdenie i rol´ v mekhanizme yuridicheskogo vozdeystviya. Pravovedenie. 1976. № 6.
27. Lazarev V. V. Primenenie sovetskogo prava. Kazan´, 1972.
28. Lazarev V. V. Effektivnost´ pravoprimenitel´nykh aktov (voprosy teorii). Kazan´, 1975.
29. Lebedev V. M. Sudebnaya praktika i razvitie zakonodatel´stva. Zakonodatel´stvo Rossii v XXI veke: po mater. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2002.
30. Livshits R. Z. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1997. № 6.
31. Lyublinskiy P. I. Tekhnika, tolkovanie i kazuistika ugolovnogo kodeksa. M., 2004.
32. Magomedov A. A. Rol´ sudebnoy praktiki v povyshenii kachestva zakonotvorcheskogo protsessa. Gosudarstvo i pravo na sovremennom etape: mater. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashchennoy 20-letiyu Konstitutsii RF. Sbornik statey i tezisov. Izberbash, 2013.
33. Malyushin A. A. Problema raz´´yasneniy resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF kak formy pravotvorchestva. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2008. № 5.
34. Manukyan A. G. Tolkovanie norm prava: vidy, sistema, predely deystviya: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2006.
35. Martynchik E., Kolokolova E. Pretsedentnoe pravo: ot sovetskoy ideologii k mezhdunarodnoy praktike. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1994. № 12.
36. Mironov D. N. Interpretatsionnaya deyatel´nost´ Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Pravo i politika. 2011. № 6.
37. Nasyrova T. Ya. Teleologicheskoe (tselevoe) tolkovanie sovetskogo zakona: teoriya i praktika. Kazan´, 1988.
38. Nersesyants V. S. U rossiyskikh sudov net pravotvorcheskikh polnomochiy. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 2000.
39. Neshataeva T. N. K voprosu ob istochnikakh prava - sudebnom pretsedente i doktrine. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 2000.
40. Obrazhiev K. V. Sudebnoe tolkovanie i sudebnoe normotvorchestvo: problemy sootnosheniya. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. № 3.
41. Pigolkin A. S. Tolkovanie norm prava i pravotvorchestvo: problemy sootnosheniya. Zakon: sozdanie i tolkovanie / pod red. A. S. Pigolkina. M., 1998.
42. Pigolkin A. S. Tolkovanie normativnykh aktov v SSSR. M., 1962.
43. Pravosudie v sovremennom mire: monografiya / pod red. V. M. Lebedeva, T. Ya. Khabrievoy. M., 2012.
44. Rabinovich P. M., Shmeleva G. G. Konkretizatsiya pravovykh norm (obshcheteoreticheskie problemy). Pravovedenie. 1985. № 6.
45. Reutov V. P. O yuridicheskoy prirode i vidakh predpisaniy, soderzhashchikhsya v aktakh vysshikh sudebnykh organov. Konkretizatsiya prava: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy: mater. IX Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2015.
46. Saulyak O. P. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik rossiyskogo prava (material´nyy i formal´nyy aspekty problemy). Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2009. № 11.
47. Smirnov A. V., Manukyan A. G. Tolkovanie norm prava. M., 2008.
48. Trofimova L. A. Ponyatie i znachenie sudebnoy praktiki v rossiyskoy pravovoy sisteme. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2016. № 2.
49. Tumanov V. A. Rol´ sudebnoy praktiki v razvitii sovetskogo prava. SSSR-Frantsiya: sotsiologicheskiy i mezhdunarodno-pravovoy aspekt sravnitel´nogo pravovedeniya. M., 1987.
50. Tsikhotskiy A. Pretsedentnoe pravo kak ob´´ektivnaya real´nost´. Nauchnye trudy «Edilet». 2000. № 1.
51. Cherdantsev A. F. Voprosy tolkovaniya sovetskogo prava. Sverdlovsk, 1972.
52. Cherdantsev A. F. Tolkovanie sovetskogo prava. M., 1979.
53. Shershenevich G. F. Obshchaya teoriya prava. T. 2. M., 1995.
