The article examines different types of political and legal innovation in the international legal space and the directly related to them socio-psychological processes influencing the level of resistance to such projects. The stages of political and legal innovation as well as the sustainability law types are highlighted in the article. Based on the literature review and analysis of cases strategies to overcome or reduce the level of resistance to such projects is being proposed.
sustainable development, international law, project management, change management, resistance to sustainability laws.
Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке РГНФ (проект «Разработка и развитие интерактивной информационно-исследовательской базы данных «Социальная психология российского предпринимательства», № 15-06-12036).
The article was prepared with financial support from the Russian Foundation for the Humanities (project «Design and Development of Interactive Information and Research Database Social Psychology of Russian Entrepreneurship», No. 15-06-12036).
1. Baker S. (2007). Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16, 297-317.
2. Bamberg S. & Möser G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
3.
4. Batel S. & Castro P. (2009). A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impact of two discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39, 415-433.
5. Bauer M. & Gaskell G. (Eds.) (2002). Biotechnology-the making of a global controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Beck U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press. 6. Beck-Gernshein E. (2000). Health and responsibility: From social change to technological change and vice versa. In B. Adam, U. Beck & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 123-135). London: Sage.
7.
8. Bonaiuto M., Carrus G., Martorella H. & Bonnes M. (2002). Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 631-653.
9. Buijs A. (2009). Public natures: Social representations of nature and local practices.Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alterra.
10. Carrus G., Bonaiuto M. & Bonnes, M. (2005) Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy. Environment and Behavior, 37, 237-257.
11. Carrus G., Cini F., Bonaiuto M., & Mauro A. (2009). Local mass media communication and environmental disputes: An analysis of press communication on the designation of the Tuscan Archipelago National Park in Italy. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 607-624.
12. Castro P. (2006). Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: Some contributions from social representations approach. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 247-266.
13. Castro P. (2012). Legal Innovation for Social Change: Exploring Change and Resistance to Different Types of Sustainability Laws. Political Psychology, 33(1): 105-121.
14. Castro P. & Batel S. (2008). Social representation, change and resistance: On the difficulties of generalizing new norms. Culture & Psychology, 14, 477-499.
15. Castro P. & Mouro C. (2011). Socio-psychological processes in dealing with change in the community: Insights gained from biodiversity conservation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 362-373.
16. Cialdini R.B. & Trost M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 2 (4th ed., pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Corral-Verdugo V. & Frías-Armenta M. (2006). Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behaviour and residential water conservation. Environment & Behavior, 38, 406-421.
18. Devine-Wright P. & Howes Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 271-280.
19. Farr R.M. (1998). From collective to social representations: Aller et retour. Culture & Psychology, 4, 275-296.
20. Foucault M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
21. Gonçalves, M.E. (2002). Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal: How changes in civic culture are challenging political and administrative practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 249-269.
22. Hernandez B., Martín A.M., Ruiz C. & Hidalgo M. C. (2010). The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 281-288.
23. Hiedanpää J. (2005). The edges of conflict and consensus: Acase for creativity in regional forest policy in Southwest Finland. Ecological Economics, 55, 485-498.
24.
25. Hovardas T., & Stamous G. (2006). Structural and narrative reconstruction of rural residents’ representations of “nature,” “wildlife,” and “landscape.” Biodiversity & Conservation, 15, 1745-1770.
26. Joule R.V. Girandola F. & Bernard F. (2007). How can people be induced to willingly change their behavior? The path from persuasive communication to binding communication. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 493-505.
27. Jovchelovitch S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.
28. Jovchelovitch S. & Gervais M.-C. (1999). Social representations of health and illness: The case of the Chinese community in England. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 247-260.
29. Marková I. (2008). The epistemological significance of the theory of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 461-487.
30. Moscovici S. (1961/1976). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF.
31. Moscovici S. (1981). On social representations. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 181-209). London: Academic Press.
32. Mouro C. & Castro P. (2010). Local communities responding to ecological challenges - A psycho-social approach to the Natura 2000 network. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20, 139-155.
33. New York City Council; Retrieved from: http://council.nyc.gov/html/releases/recycling_4_10_10.shtml
34. Orfali B. (2006). Extreme right movements: Why do they re-emerge? Why are they accepted? Theory & Psychology, 16, 715-736.
35. Rayens M.K., Hahn E.J., Langley R.E., Hedgecock S., Butler K.M. & Greathouse-Maggio L. (2007). Public opinion and smoke-free laws. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 8, 262-270.
36. Rosa H. & Silva J. (2005). From environmental ethics to nature conservation policy: Natura 2000 and the burden of proof. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 18, 107-130.
37. Rutherford P. (1999). The entry of life into history. In E. Darier (Ed.), Discourses of the environment (pp. 95-118). Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Simon B. & Oakes P. (2006). Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination. Human Relations, 59, 105-139.
39. Spini D., & Doise W. (1998). Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603-622.
40. Spini D., & Doise W. (2005). Universal human rights and duties as normative social representations. In N.J. Finkel & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of human rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 21-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Stern P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. 40. Stoll-Kleemann S. (2001). Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 369-385.
42.
43. Uzzell, D., & Rathzel, N. (2009). Transforming environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 340-350.
44. Wagner W., Duveen G., Verma J., & Themel M. (1999). The modernization of tradition: thinking about madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5, 413-445.
