employee
Russian Federation
The article substantiates the structure of law-application discretion as a general theoretical model of legal choice. Discretion is considered not as a defect of legal regulation or a consequence of legislative incompleteness, but as a legally organized mechanism for concretizing law under conditions of legally significant uncertainty. The proposed model includes interrelated elements: the subject, objective, content, teleological, axiological and formal-resultative components, as well as the ground of discretion and the limits separating lawful choice from arbitrariness. Particular attention is paid to the fact that subjects of legal discretion may include not only public authorities, but also private persons when the law grants them a legally meaningful space for choice. The practical significance of the model lies in its applicability to the analysis of judicial and administrative decisions and to the assessment of the reasoning, proportionality and verifiability of law-application choice.
law-application discretion; legal discretion; legal choice; structure of discretion; limits of discretion; arbitrariness; law enforcement
1. Barak A. Sudeyskoe usmotrenie [Judicial Discretion]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 1999. 376 p. (In Russ.).
2. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Administrativnoe usmotrenie i pravo [Administrative discretion and law]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2000, no. 4, pp. 70–79. (In Russ.).
3. Tsybulevskaya O. I. (ed.). Usmotrenie v pravoprimenitelnoi deyatelnosti: sovremennye podkhody [Discretion in Law-Application Activity: Modern Approaches]. Saratov, Volga Region Institute of Management — Branch of RANEPA Publ., 2022. 272 p. (In Russ.).
4. Chibizov V. V. Pravoprimenitelnoe usmotrenie i ego rol v preodolenii yuridicheskikh kollizii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Law-Application Discretion and Its Role in Overcoming Legal Conflicts: Cand. Legal Sci. Diss.]. Moscow, 2020. 216 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ignatiev A. S. Usmotrenie kak pravovaya obshcheteoreticheskaya kategoriya i algoritm ego otraslevogo analiza: na primere sfery sudebnogo konstitutsionnogo kontrolya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Discretion as a General Theoretical Legal Category and an Algorithm for Its Branch Analysis: The Case of Judicial Constitutional Control: Cand. Legal Sci. Diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2015. 211 p. (In Russ.).
6. Reyes Molina S. A. Judicial Discretion as a Result of Systemic Indeterminacy. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2020, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 369–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.7
7. Asgeirsson H. A Puzzle about Vagueness, Reasons, and Judicial Discretion. Legal Theory, 2022, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 175–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325222000143
8. Tanzilulloh M. I., Hartiwiningsih H. Understanding Judicial Discretion: A Comparative Study of Judge’s Legal Reasoning in Civil Law and Common Law Jurisdictions. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2024, vol. 814, pp. 683–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7_92
9. Onosov Yu. V. Predely, granitsy i ogranicheniya pravoprimenitelnogo usmotreniya [Limits, Boundaries and Restrictions of Law-Application Discretion]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2022, no. 9, pp. 7–13. (In Russ.).
10. Sumenkov S. Yu. Yuridicheskie isklyucheniya i pravoprimenitelnoe usmotrenie [Legal Exceptions and Law-Application Discretion]. Pravo i politika, 2018, no. 3, pp. 33–39. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18393
11. Azarova E. S. Mekhanizm formirovaniya pravoprimenitelnogo usmotreniya [The Mechanism of Formation of Law-Application Discretion]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2019, no. 4, pp. 134–141. (In Russ.).
12. Nintsieva T. M., Kolesnikova O. Yu., Kharitonova O. N. Pravovoe osnovanie i mekhanizm formirovaniya pravoprimenitelnogo usmotreniya [Legal Ground and Mechanism of Formation of Law-Application Discretion]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 412–414. (In Russ.).
13. Starostin S. A. Administrativnoe usmotrenie: ponyatie, predely, kontrol [Administrative Discretion: Concept, Limits, Control]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2020, no. 8, pp. 145–157. (In Russ.).
14. Solovey Yu. P. Diskretsionnyi kharakter administrativnogo akta kak obstoyatelstvo, isklyuchayushchee sudebnuyu proverku ego zakonnosti [The Discretionary Nature of an Administrative Act as a Circumstance Excluding Judicial Review of Its Legality]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2019, no. 4, pp. 72–99. (In Russ.).
15. Sherstoboev O. N. Sudebnaya proverka administrativnogo usmotreniya: sravnitelno-pravovoi podkhod [Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion: A Comparative Legal Approach]. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 2021. 248 p. (In Russ.).
16. Cravens S. M. R. Judging Discretion: Contexts for Understanding the Abuse of Discretion Standard. Texas Law Review, 2008, vol. 87, pp. 435–500.
17. O sudebnom reshenii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 19 dekabrya 2003 g. № 23 [On the Judicial Decision: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 19, 2003 No. 23]. Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2004, no. 2. (In Russ.).
18. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii punkta 2 stati 1070 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 25 yanvarya 2001 g. № 1-P [Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of January 25, 2001 No. 1-P]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2001, no. 7, art. 700. (In Russ.).
19. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 1 stati 308.3 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 2 iyunya 2022 g. № 23-P [Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of June 2, 2022 No. 23-P]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2022, no. 24, art. 4103. (In Russ.).
20. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 5 stati 19.8 Kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14 fevralya 2013 g. № 4-P [Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of February 14, 2013 No. 4-P]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2013, no. 8, art. 868. (In Russ.).
21. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdelnykh polozhenii nalogovogo zakonodatelstva: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14 fevralya 2024 g. № 6-P [Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of February 14, 2024 No. 6-P]. Sobranie zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2024, no. 8, art. 1098. (In Russ.).
