In the past decade is widely discussed the problem of geometric and graphic training of students of technical universities in Russia. In 1980-2005 arose contradictions between traditional and innovative methods of teaching for descriptive geometry and engineering graphics. This marked the article Professor P.A. Tunakov, in which descriptive geometry was carried to a dying science. This radical statement in subsequent years was supported by V.A. Rukavishnikov [15; 16] and A.L. Kheifets. An additional impetus to discussions was given by the developers of the Federal state educational standards of higher education (FSES), which declared the competence approach to the process of learning and evaluation of knowledge of graduates. Introduction in educational process of computer graphics and the appearance of technologies of 3D modeling prompted some representatives of the departments of engineering graphics towards the radical statements: • descriptive geometry as a graphic discipline became "moribund", "morally obsolete"; • it is necessary to refuse from the method of projection, as "fundamentally important is a matter of conformity to the dimension of the three-dimensional computer model and the modeled object". The article proves the incorrectness of these statements. History and background of transformation of the descriptive geometry in the engineering geometry are shown: 1) references to the dynamics of change subjects of presentations at the Moscow seminars on descriptive geometry and on engineering graphics during 1944–1965; the themes of dissertations on the specialty 05.01.01 engineering geometry and computer graphics (up to 1977 – applied geometry and engineering graphics); 2) the requirements of competence-based learning model to establish: • intrasubject links (combination of synthetics and analytical methods of problem solving); • interdisciplinary connections by expanding the subject of the discipline of the multidimensional shapes; 3) the incorrectness of opposing the "by the radicals" of 2D and 3D models, for they are complementary the types of modeling single method of two images.
descriptive geometry, engineering geometry, modeling, synthetic and analytical methods, multidimensional forms.
1. Baydenko V.I. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod k proektirovaniyu gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel´nykh standartov vysshego professional´nogo obrazovaniya (Metodologicheskie i metodicheskie voprosy) [Competence approach to the design of the sovereign-governmental educational standards of higher professional education (Methodological and methodical questions)]. Moscow, Issledovatel´skiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov Publ., 2005.
2. Berlov M.N. Tekhnicheskaya grafika [Technical schedule]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosmashmetizdat Publ. 1934.
3. Voloshinov D.V., Solomonov K.N. Konstruktivnoe geometricheskoe modelirovanie kak perspektiva prepodavaniya graficheskikh distsiplin [Design geometric modeling as the prospect of teaching graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. 2013, I. 2, pp. 10-13. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/778.
4. Voloshinov D.V. O perspektivakh razvitiya geometrii i ee instrumentariya [On the prospects of the development of geometry and its tools]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. 2014, I. 1, pp. 15-21. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3844.
5. Golovanov N.N. Geometric modeling. Moscow, Fizmatgiz Publ. 2002.
6. Gornov A.O., Usanova E.V., Shatsillo L.A. GGP - sostoyanie, tendentsii, prognozy [GGP - status, trends, forecasts]. Materialy III nauchno-prakticheskoy internet-konferentsii [Proceedings of the III scientific and practical Internetconference]. Permian, PNIPU Publ. 2013, pp. 39-47. (in Russian).
7. Gornov A.O., Shatsillo L.A. Mezhdistsiplinarnye aspekty GGP i inzhenernoy podgotovki [Interdisciplinary aspects of TGP and engi-mountain training]. Vserossiyskoe soveshchanie zaveduyushchikh kafedrami inzhenerno-graficheskikh distsiplin tekhnicheskikh vuzov [All-Russia meeting of heads of departments of engineering-graphic disciplines of technical universities.]. Rostov-on-Don, DGTU Publ., 2015, pp. 27-35. (in Russian).
8. Ivanov G.S. Teoreticheskie osnovy nachertatel´noy geometrii [Theoretical foundations of descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1988.
9. Ivanov G.S. Nachertatel´naya geometriya [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, FGBOU VPO MGUL Publ., 2012.
10. Kaygorodtseva N.V. Opredelenie soderzhaniya i tekhnologii geometro-graficheskoy podgotovki budushchikh inzhenerov na osnove integratsii informatsionnykh sred. Dokt. Diss. [The definition of the content and technologies of geometric and graphic training of future engineers through the integration of information environments. Doct. Diss.]. Omsk, 2015. (in Russian).
11. Korotkiy V.A., Khmarova L.I. Lomonosov i komp´yuternye tekhnologii v obuchenii nachertatel´noy geometrii [Lomonosov and computer technology in teaching descriptive geometry]. Rostov-on-Don, DGTU Publ.,2015, pp. 64-73. (in Russian).
12. Kulikov S.M. O dissertatsiyakh po nachertatel´noy geometrii i chercheniyu [Detail on descriptive geometry and plotting]. Trudy Moskovskogo nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara po nachertatel´noy geometrii i inzhenernoy grafike [Proceedings of the Moscow scientific-methodological seminar on descriptive geometry and engineering graphics]. Moscow, 1963, I. 2, pp. 318-324. (in Russian).
13. Monzh G. Nachertatel´naya geometriya [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR Publ., 1947.
14. Pervikova V.N., Naumovich N.V., Dmitrienko G.E., Zaytseva E.P., Podylina M.G. Mnogomernaya nachertatel´naya geometriya i geometricheskie metody issledovaniya mnogokomponentnykh sistem [The multidimensional descriptive geometry and geometric methods for studying multicomponent systems]. Trudy Moskovskogo nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara po nachertatel´noy geometrii i inzhenernoy grafike [Proceedings of the Moscow scientific-methodological seminar on descriptive geometry and engineering graphics]. Moscow, MAI Publ., 1972, I. 3, pp. 23-24. (in Russian).
15. Rukavishnikov V.A. Geometro-graficheskaya podgotovka inzhenera: vremya reform [Geometric-Graphic Engineer Training: during reforms]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2008, I. 5, pp. 132-136. (in Russian).
16. Rukavishnikov V.A., Khalueva V.V., Akhmerov T.L. Geometrograficheskaya podgotovka v vuze: problemy modernizatsii [Geometric-graphic preparation in high school: problems of modernization]. Vserossiyskoe soveshchanie zaveduyushchikh kafedrami inzhenerno-graficheskikh distsiplin tekhnicheskikh vuzov [All-Russia meeting of heads of departments of engineering-graphic disciplines of technical universities]. Rostov-on-Don, DGTU Publ. 2015, pp. 132-138. (in Russian).
17. Seregin V.I., Ivanov G.S., Dmitrieva I.M., Murav´ev K.A. Mezhdistsiplinarnye svyazi nachertatel´noy geometrii i smezhnykh razdelov vysshey matematiki [Interdisciplinary communication descriptive geometry and adjacent sections of higher mathematics]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. 2013, I. 3, 4, pp. 8-12. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2124.
18. Spisok dokladov, zaslushannykh na Moskovskom nauchnometodicheskom seminare po nachertatel´noy geometrii i inzhenernoy grafike za 1944-1965 gg. [List of lectures delivered at the Moscow Scientific-methodological seminar on descriptive geometry and engineering graphics for 1944-1965 years]. Moskovskogo nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara po nachertatel´noy geometrii i inzhenernoy grafike [Proceedings of the Moscow scientific-methodological seminar on descriptive geometry and engineering graphics]. Moscow, MAI Publ., 1972, I. 3, pp. 191-207. (in Russian).
19. Stolbova I.D., Aleksandrova E.P., Kraynova M.N., Kochurova L.V. O sozdanii uchebno-metodicheskogo kompleksa dlya soprovozhdeniya graficheskoy podgotovki studentov [On the creation of educational complex for maintenance of graphic preparation of students]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. Moscow, 2015, I. 2, pp. 29-37. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/12166.
20. Stolbova I.D., Aleksandrova E.P., Nosov K.G. Proektnoorientirovannaya deyatel´nost´ studentov mladshikh kursov [Project-oriented activities of undergraduate students]. Vserossiyskoe soveshchanie zaveduyushchikh kafedrami inzhenerno-graficheskikh distsiplin tekhnicheskikh vuzov [All-Russia meeting of heads of departments of engineeringgraphic disciplines of technical universities]. Rostov-on-Don, DGTU Publ., 2015, pp. 149-158. (in Russian).
21. Tikhonov-Bugrov D.E. O nekotorykh problemakh graficheskoy podgotovki v tekhnicheskikh vuzakh (vzglyad iz Sankt-Peterburga) [On some problems of graphic preparation of the technical institutions (think of St. Petersburg)]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. Moscow, 2014, I. 1, pp. 46-52. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3848.
22. Tunakov A.P. Zachem prepodavat´ studentam umirayushchie distsipliny [Why teach students dying discipline]. Poisk [Search]. 2007, I. 11. (in Russian).
23. Kharakh M.M., Kozlova I.A., Slavin B.M. Konstruirovanie sborochnogo chertezha izdeliya metodom 3D-modelirovaniya kak zavershayushchiy etap izucheniya inzhenernoy i komp´yuternoy grafiki [Construction product assembly drawing by 3D-modeling as a final stage in the study of engineering and computer graphics]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. Moscow, 2014, no. 3, pp. 36-40. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/5588.
24. Kharakh M.M., Kozlova I.A., Slavin B.M., Guseva T.V. Postroenie linii peresecheniya nekotorykh slozhnykh poverkhnostey 2-go poryadka v «Kompas» s pomoshch´yu 2Di 3D-tekhnologiy [Construction of the line of intersection of some complex surfaces 2nd order in the "Compass" using 2D and 3D technology]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. Moscow, no 2, pp. 38-45. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/12167.
25. Kheyfets A.L. Sravnenie metodov nachertatel´noy geometrii i 3D-metodov geometricheskogo modelirovaniya [Comparison of methods of descriptive geometry and 3D geometric modeling methods]. Vserossiyskoe soveshchanie zaveduyushchikh kafedrami inzhenerno-graficheskikh distsiplin tekhnicheskikh vuzov [All-Russia meeting of heads of departments of engineering-graphic disciplines of technical universities]. Rostovon-Don, DGTU Publ., 2015, pp. 175-186. (in Russian).
26. Yakunin V.I., Guznenkov V.N. Geometro-graficheskie distsipliny v vuze: segodnya, zavtra [Geometric and graphic disciplines in high school today, tomorrow]. Vserossiyskoe soveshchanie zaveduyushchikh kafedrami inzhenerno-graficheskikh distsiplin tekhnicheskikh vuzov [All-Russia meeting of heads of departments of engineering-graphic disciplines of technical universities.]. Rostov-on-Don, DGTU Publ., 2015, pp. 192-198. (in Russian).
