This scientific work analyzes the characteristics of vindication of specific things that are contributed to the Chartered capital of a Limited Liability Company (LLC). The author critically assesses the doctrinal and judicial positions in relation to the commutative nature of contributions to the Chartered capital. The non-gratuitous nature of the contribution acquisition is artificial and unusual. The economic entity doesn’t provide the founder with the share in the Chartered capital as it does not possess it. The share is acquired by the founder by virtue of law in connection with the LLC state registration and is a converted contribution. In the light of the civil legislation reform in the Russian Federation and with regard to the English law particular attention is paid to understanding the bona fide of a legal entity through the behavior of its head. Under certain circumstances, it’s not reasonable to regard the head’s evil conscience as the will of the company. In case of a claim for the recovery of contributions to the Charter capital prior to the state registration of the Corporation in the register, the claim should be reported directly to the contributed assets, which are advisable to position as an “unused” contribution. The court must suspend the case until the establishment of a legal entity.
Vindication, contribution to the share capital, share in the chartered capital, additional contribution to the share capital, bona fide of the corporation.
1. Bevzenko R. S. Istrebovanie imushchestva, vnesennogo v ustavnoy kapital yuridicheskogo litsa. Zakonodatel´stvo. 2004. № 12.
2. Belova D. A. Zashchita vladeniya i veshchnykh prav v svete reformirovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel´stva Rossii. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. № 6.
3. Vlasova A. V. Pravovaya priroda prinyatiya ispolneniya po obyazatel´stvu. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. № 5.
4. Krasavchikov O. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. M., 1958.
5. Nazykov A. L. O vindikatsii imushchestva, otchuzhdennogo direktorom kompanii pomimo ee voli, ili v kakikh sluchayakh deystviya direktora ne yavlyayutsya vyrazheniem voli kompanii (britanskiy opyt dlya rossiyskoy praktiki). Zakon. 2013. № 1.
6. Pilipson E. G. Dogovornoe nasledovanie: neobkhodimost´ i perspektivy formirovaniya predmeta pravovogo regulirovaniya i issledovaniya pravovogo instituta. Voprosy pravovedeniya. 2014. № 4.
7. Podshivalov T. P. Kriterii dlya ogranicheniya vindikatsii v arbitrazhnoy praktike. Zakonodatel´stvo. 2014. № 1.
8. Sikachev M. N. Osobennosti izmeneniya i prekrashcheniya dogovora o sozdanii yuridicheskogo litsa. Zakonodatel´stvo i ekonomika. 2013. № 10.
9. Sklovskiy K. I. O zashchite prav sobstvennika i vladel´tsa imushchestva, realizovannogo na publichnykh torgakh. Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2000. № 1.
10. Strel´nikov P. A. Vindikatsionnyy isk v zashchite prava sobstvennosti na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo yuridicheskikh lits. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 9.
11. Tarasenko Yu. A. O nedeystvitel´nosti osnovaniya vneseniya vklada v ustavnoy kapital aktsionernogo obshchestva. Zakonodatel´stvo. 2005. № 1.
12. Tolstoy V. S. Ispolnenie obyazatel´stva. M., 1973.
13. Ushakov O. V. Dobrosovestnoe priobretenie ot neupravomochennogo litsa: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2002.
14. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. T. 1. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul´tantPlyus». 2005.
15. Shitik I. N. Vindikatsionnye iski: nereshennye voprosy (interv´yu s M. A. Erokhovoy, glavnym konsul´tantom Upravleniya analiza i obobshcheniya sudebnoy praktiki VAS RF, gosudarstvennym sovetnikom yustitsii III klassa, kandidatom yuridicheskikh nauk). Arbitrazhnoe pravosudie v Rossii. 2009. № 1.
