Proposals in the science of criminal law approaches to the definition of the form of guilt (intentional, reckless or determined by the court in a particular case) of a crime provided for in Article 263 “Violation of safety rules and operation of railway, air, sea and inland waterway transport and underground” of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are considered in the article. The place of motives (positive, neutral and negative) of violation of safety rules and operation as part of the crime is evaluated. Based on the analysis of legal literature and materials law enforcement practice the author made a conclusion that the crime under Article 263 of the Criminal Code is careless, but the study of its subjective side in the theory of criminal law, and the investigative and judicial practice must include the determination of the form of mental attitude of a person for violation of safety rules and operation of transport (which can be both intentional and reckless) and assessment of the motives of such violations.
security, transport, movement and operation, safety rules, violation of the rules, consequences, guilt, intent, negligence motive.
1. Balashov S. K., Ivanov V. D. Umyshlennaya i neostorozhnaya formy viny pri narushenii pravil bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii zheleznodorozhnogo transporta. Nauch. trudy uchenykh-yuristov Severo-Kavkazskogo regiona. Vyp. 9. Krasnodar, 2005.
2. Belokobyl´skiy N. N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost´ za narushenie pravil bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii zheleznodorozhnogo transporta: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1981.
3. Bondarenko N. A., Dzyuba V. T. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennogo poryadka i obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti: ucheb. posobie. Kiev, 1990.
4. Byulleten´ Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1965. № 3.
5. Dagel´ P. S. O kharaktere sub´´ektivnoy storony avtotransportnykh prestupleniy (k diskussii o smeshannoy forme viny). Problemy bor´by s prestupnost´yu: sb. nauch. tr. Omsk, 1977.
6. Dagel´ P., Kotov D. Sub´´ektivnaya storona prestupleniya i ee ustanovlenie / nauch. red. G. F. Gorskiy. Voronezh, 1974.
7. Kvashis V. E. Profilaktika neostorozhnykh prestupleniy: ucheb. posobie. Kiev, 1981.
8. Kopeychenko A. P. K voprosu o vine po delam o narusheniyakh pravil bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transporta. Problemy sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti na sovremennom etape razvitiya sovetskogo gosudarstva: tezisy dokl. mezhvuz. nauch. konf. (oktyabr´ 1968 g.). Khar´kov, 1968.
9. Korobeev A. I. Transportnye pravonarusheniya: kvalifikatsiya i otvetstvennost´: prakt. posobie. M., 1990.
10. Korobeev A. I. Transportnye prestupleniya. SPb., 2003.
11. Korobeev A. I. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana bezopasnosti moreplavaniya v SSSR. Vladivostok, 1984.
12. Korcheva Z. G. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy na zheleznodorozhnom, vodnom i vozdushnom transporte. Nauchnaya konferentsiya po rabotam, vypolnennym v 1964 godu (sentyabr´ 1965 g.): tezisy dokl. Khabarovsk, 1965.
13. Kremenov I. N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost´ za transportnye prestupleniya: ucheb. posobie. Tashkent, 1990.
14. Kudryavtsev V. N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M., 2001.
15. Kudryavtsev V. N. Motivy prestupnogo povedeniya. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2007. № 4.
16. Kuznetsova N. O kvalifikatsii viny. Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1980. № 23.
17. Luneev V. V. Sub´´ektivnoe vmenenie. M., 2000.
18. Lyapunov Yu. Otvetstvennost´ za narushenie deystvuyushchikh na transporte pravil. Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1971. № 14.
19. Nersesyan V. A. Neostorozhnaya vina: problemy i resheniya.. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. № 4.
20. Nersesyan V. A. Otvetstvennost´ za neostorozhnye prestupleniya: sostoyanie i puti sovershenstvovaniya. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 3.
21. Petelin B. Znachenie motiva i tseli pri neostorozhnom prestuplenii. Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1973. № 7.
22. Rarog A. I. Nastol´naya kniga sud´i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M., 2006.
23. Starkov V. G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost´ za narushenie pravil bezopasnosti poletov i ekspluatatsii vozdushnogo transporta: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1975.
24. Ter-Akopov A. A. Prestuplenie i problemy nefizicheskoy prichinnosti v ugolovnom prave. M., 2003.
25. Tokmantsev D. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost´ za narushenie pravil bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii zheleznodorozhnogo, vozdushnogo, morskogo i vnutrennego vodnogo transporta i metropolitena: monografiya. Krasnoyarsk, 2012.
26. Filimonov V. D. Norma ugolovnogo prava. SPb., 2004.
27. Cheptsov N. R. Problemy pervonachal´nogo etapa rassledovaniya prestupleniy protiv bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii morskogo transporta (na materialakh Dal´nego Vostoka): avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Vladivostok, 2006.
28. Chuchaev A. I. Narushenie pravil bezopasnosti dvizheniya ili ekspluatatsii vodnogo transporta (ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie): avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1982.
29. Shesler A. V. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i profilaktika neostorozhnoy prestupnosti. Krasnoyarsk, 2002.
30. Eminov V. E. Bor´ba s aviatsionnymi proisshestviyami (voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i preduprezhdeniya prestupnykh narusheniy pravil bezopasnosti poletov i ekspluatatsii vozdushnogo transporta). M., 1980.
