Omskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. F.M. Dostoevskogo (yuridicheskiy otdel, nachal'nik otdela)
Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
The causes and necessity of use of the notion “legal pluralism” in interbranch disciplines (in connection to jurisprudence) including sociology of law, anthropology of law, scientific direction “law and society” are disclosed in this article. This notion is fully formed way of reflection in law including a key contradiction between law in juridical meaning and other social law in non-juridical humanity sciences. In this article the pluralism in strong and weak meaning is analyzed as well as the opportunity of pluralism in juridical law (poliyuridizm), pluralism in juridical and other social law, pluralism in social law, meaning of appropriate facts for person and juridical practice. The attention is also paid to distinctive particulars of primary social law and its influence on juridical law.
Legal pluralism, law in juridical meaning, law in social meaning, sociology of law, law and society.
1. Aleksi R. Dual´naya priroda prava. Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik teorii prava. 2009. № 2. SPb., 2011.
2. Baranov V. M. Tenevoe pravo. N. Novgorod, 2002.
3. Benda-Bekmann K. fon. Zachem bespokoit´sya o pravovom plyuralizme? Voprosy izucheniya i osushchestvleniya politiki pravovogo plyuralizma. Obychnoe pravo i pravovoy plyuralizm. M., 1999.
4. Benda-Bekmann K. fon. Pravovoy plyuralizm v mezhdunarodnom kontekste. Obychay i zakon. Issledovaniya po yuridicheskoy antropologii. M., 2002.
5. Berman G. Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. M., 1998.
6. Bocharov V. V. Nepisanyy zakon: antropologiya prava. SPb., 2013.
7. Var´yash I. I. Opyt pireneyskikh musul´man: vne zakona, no v sotsiume. Pravo v srednevekovom mire. SPb., 2001.
8. Var´yash O. I. Gorodskoe pravo i pravo v gorode kak faktor edineniya. Gorod v srednevekovoy tsivilizatsii Zapadnoy Evropy. T. 3. M., 2000.
9. Vudman G. Teoriya prava, antropologiya i planovyy pravovoy plyuralizm. Obychnoe pravo i pravovoy plyuralizm. M., 1999.
10. Gurvich G. D. Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava. SPb., 2004.
11. Gurevich A. Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kul´tury. M., 1984.
12. Devyataykina N. I. Pravo i proizvol v ital´yanskom gorode XIV veka glazami Petrarki. Pravo v srednevekovom mire. SPb., 2001.
13. Dugin A. Pravovoy plyuralizm kak evraziyskoe ponimanie o prave. URL: http://www.evrazia.org/modules.php?name=News&;file=article&sid=2270 (data obrashcheniya: 22.03.2015).
14. Zinov´ev A. A. Kommunizm kak real´nost´. M., 2003.
15. Karbon´e Zh. Yuridicheskaya sotsiologiya. M., 1986.
16. Kashanina T. V. Proiskhozhdenie gosudarstva i prava. M., 2004.
17. Kovler A. I. Antropologiya prava i pravovoy plyuralizm (prava cheloveka i prava narodov). Olen´ vsegda prav. Issledovaniya po yuridicheskoy antropologii. M., 2003.
18. Krevel´d M. Rastsvet i upadok gosudarstva. M., 2006.
19. Motyka K. Predvoskhishchaya Malinovskogo: vklad Petrazhitskogo v izuchenie pravovogo plyuralizma. Obychnoe pravo i pravovoy plyuralizm. M., 1999.
20. Petrazhitskiy L. I. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti. SPb., 2000.
21. Sabo I. Obshchaya teoriya prava. M., 1974.
22. Sinitsina I. E. Obychay i obychnoe pravo v sovremennoy Afrike. M., 1978.
23. Stridzhbosh F. Kontseptsii pravovogo plyuralizma i ikh primenimost´ v kontekste izucheniya yuridicheskoy praktiki u molukktsev v Niderlandakh. Obychnoe pravo i pravovoy plyuralizm. M., 1999.
24. Syukiyaynen L. R. Islam i prava cheloveka v dialoge kul´tur i religiy. M., 2014.
25. Tomanakha B. T. Ponimanie pravovogo plyuralizma: ot proshlogo k nastoyashchemu, ot lokal´nogo k global´nomu. Pravo i pravoprimenenie v zerkale sotsial´nykh nauk: khrestomatiya sovremennykh tekstov. M., 2014.
26. Khints M. Pravovoy plyuralizm i «osnovnaya norma» Kel´zena: k antropologii yurisprudentsii. Obychnoe pravo i pravovoy plyuralizm. M., 1999.
27. Elias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii. Sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya. T. 2. M.; SPb., 2001.
