A STUDY OF THE POSSIBILITIES OF APPLYING 
KURT LEWIN'S CONCEPT IN MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL 
CHANGES TAKING INTO ACCOUNT MODERN CONDITIONS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article explores the applicability of Kurt Lewin’s classical three-stage model in organizational change management within the context of the modern VUCA world (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity). A critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of Lewin’s model, including its linearity and focus on long-term stability, is conducted in comparison with innovative approaches such as Agile, Appreciative Inquiry, and complexity theory. Case studies of companies (General Motors, IBM, Zoom, Amazon, Disney) demonstrate the contexts where Lewin’s model remains relevant and where integration with flexible methods is required. Hybrid solutions 
are proposed, combining the stages of "unfreezing," "changing," and "refreezing" with digital tools, iterative cycles, and real-time data analysis. Special emphasis is placed on balancing result sustainability with adaptability, as well as ethical aspects of technology adoption. The research findings provide a framework for managing change in the era of digital transformation and global crises.

Keywords:
organizational change management, Kurt Lewin's model, VUCA world, Agile methods, Appreciative Inquiry, digital transformation, hybrid models
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and Complexity Theories: Back to the Future? Journal 
of Change Management, 4(2), 309–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1469701042000303811

2. Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

3. Cummings, T.G., Worley, C.G. (2005). Organization Development & Change. 8th ed. 
South-Western College Pub.

4. Disney-Pixar Merger Case Study. (2006). Harvard Business Review, 84(7), 64–72.

5. Google Leadership Lab. (2023). Agile Leadership in the VUCA World. Retrieved from https://rework.withgoogle.com.

6. Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill.

7. Kanter, R.M. (2012). Ten Reasons People Resist Change. Harvard Business Review, 90, 42–47.

8. Kotter, J.P. (2014). Accelerate! Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 44–58.

9. Leonard, H.S., Lewis, R., Freedman, A.M., Passmore, J. (Eds.). (2013). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Leadership, Change, and Organizational Development. 
Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326404

10. McKinsey & Company. (2020). *Adapting Workplace Strategies to the COVID-19 Era*. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com.

11. Netflix AI Integration Report. (2021). Journal of Digital Transformation, 15(3), 45–60.

12. Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., Norcross, J.C. (1992). In Search of How People Change. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102

13. Rigby, D.K., Elk, S., Berez, S. (2020). Doing Agile Right: Transformation Without Chaos. Harvard Business Review Press.

14. Siemens AG. (2022). AI-Driven Employee Engagement Strategies. Internal White Paper.

15. Stacey, R.D. (2001). Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. Routledge.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?