BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES IN CIVIL LAW: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ANALYSIS OF EMERGENCY INTERVENTION SYSTEMS IN SMART CONTRACTS AND PROSPECTS FOR CIS COUNTRIES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Abstract. Purpose. The article examines international legal approaches to regulating emergency intervention mechanisms in blockchain smart contracts and analyzes the possibility of adapting foreign experience in CIS countries. The research aims to identify optimal legal solutions for ensuring a balance between technological autonomy of decentralized systems and the need for legal control in the context of digital economic transformation. Research methods. Comparative legal analysis, formal legal method, analysis of normative acts and international documents are used. Special attention is paid to the study of European regulation of blockchain technologies and "kill switch" mechanisms. The legal regimes of the European Union (MiCA, Data Act, eIDAS 2.0), Switzerland, Singapore, UAE and Japan, as well as the legislation of CIS countries in the field of digital technologies, have been studied. Results. The conducted analysis demonstrates the evolution of approaches to legal regulation of smart contracts from complete autonomy to controlled decentralization. Key principles of European legislation in the field of digital technologies have been identified, including mandatory termination functions for smart contracts according to the EU Data Act. The main models of technical implementation of emergency shutdown mechanisms and criteria for their application have been established. Jurisdictional problems of cross-border enforcement of decisions on forced termination of smart contracts have been identified. Discussion. The development of blockchain technologies creates new challenges for traditional civil law, requiring a balance between technological innovation and legal certainty. "Kill switch" mechanisms represent a compromise between smart contract autonomy and the need for judicial control. CIS countries can use European experience to create modern legal regimes for regulating blockchain technologies, taking into account the national characteristics of legal systems. Specific recommendations for improving legislation.

Keywords:
blockchain technologies, smart contracts, private international law, digital assets, emergency shutdown mechanisms, kill switch, European regulation, Data Act, MiCA, eIDAS 2.0, CIS countries, civil law, decentralized technologies, legal regulation, digital economy.
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download

 

 
References

1. Savelyev A.I. Contract law 2.0: "smart" contracts as the beginning of the end of classical con-tract law // Civil Law Review. 2016. № 3. P. 32-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2885241; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WHFFCX

2. Pluzhnichenko A.G. Legal regulation of smart contracts // Education and Law. 2025. № 1. P. 412-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2025-1-412-414; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UNYGGN

3. Suchkova N.A. Problems of applying blockchain technology in civil law // International Jour-nal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021. № 11-4. P. 175-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2021-11-4-175-177; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IMFFNM

4. Shushkanov P.A., Ryakhovskaya Ya.O. Smart contracts in the Russian legal system // Law and Management. 2022. № 10. P. 99-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-9125-2022-10-99-105; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VKGJGO

5. Rodionov A. The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Creating Decentralized Identity Systems: Technical Capabilities and Legal Regulation // International Journal of Law and Pol-icy. 2024. Vol. 2. № 4. P. 19-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.170

6. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) // Official Journal of the European Union. 2023. L 150. P. 40-205.

7. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act) // Official Journal of the European Union. 2023. L 326. P. 1-74.

8. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 amending Regulation (EU) 910/2014 on elec-tronic identification and trust services (eIDAS 2.0) // Official Journal of the European Union. 2024. L 200. P. 1-89.

9. Finck M. Smart contracts as a form of solely automated processing under the GDPR // Inter-national Data Privacy Law. 2019. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 78-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz004

10. De Filippi P., Wright A. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018. – 312 p.

11. Mik E. Smart contracts: terminology, technical limitations and real world complexity // Law, Innovation and Technology. 2017. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 269-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1378468

12. Switzerland Federal Council. Federal Act on the Adaptation of Federal Law to Developments in Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT Act) // Swiss Official Gazette. 2021. № 15. P. 45-78.

13. Monetary Authority of Singapore. Payment Services Act 2019: Guidelines on Licensing // MAS Notice 626. 2020. 234 p.

14. United Arab Emirates. Federal Law No. 4 of 2022 on the Regulation of Virtual Assets // UAE Official Gazette. 2022. № 706. P. 1-45.

15. Japan Financial Services Agency. Payment Services Act (Amendment): Regulations on Elec-tronic Payment Instruments // FSA Notice. 2020. № 89. P. 198-225.

16. Koulu R. Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement // SCRIPTed. 2016. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 40-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2966/script.130116.40

17. Low K.F.K., Mik E. Pause the blockchain legal revolution // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 69. № 1. P. 135-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000502

18. Rühl G. The Law Applicable to Smart Contracts, or Much Ado About Nothing? // Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2020. Vol. 27. № 4. P. 264-292.

19. Gulyamov S. Application of Computational Law and Artificial Intelligence Methods for Sha-ria Compliance Analysis of E-Waste Management Systems Based on Blockchain // Suhuf: In-ternational Journal of Islamic Studies. 2024. Vol. 36. № 1. P. 21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v36i1.4447

20. Deryagin I.V. Legal regulation of digital technologies // Legal Science. 2023. № 10. P. 93-97. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JVJHHK

Login or Create
* Forgot password?