Russian Federation
employee from 01.01.2024 until now
Odyntsovo, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article addresses the specifics of mutual linguocultural borrowings in Russian and Chinese languages, reflecting changes in the linguistic picture of the world under the influence of socio-cultural and economic-political phenomena and processes. The relevance of the study is conditioned by historical and geographical conditions as well as economic and political processes that have led to the intensification of contacts between Russia and China in various spheres. The aim of the article is to conduct a linguocultural analysis of Russian loanwords in Chinese language and culture and Chinese loanwords in Russian linguoculture in the aspect of communicative practices. Methodologically, the research is based on socio-cultural, historical and comparitive approaches. In the course of the study the authors used the method of analysing scientific literature on the topic of the paper, as well as methods of comparison when considering the interpretation of the concept of ‘borrowing’ offered by Russian and Chinese linguists, methods of generalisation and systematisation of the obtained information. The conducted research allowed for identifying the main ways, sources and methods of mutual borrowings in Chinese and Russian linguocultures. The authors conclude that linguocultural borrowings form a linguistic picture of the world, make an integral part of intercultural communication and promote better mutual understanding among peoples. The practical significance of the article consists in the possibility of using the obtained results in teaching Chinese in Russia and Russian in China.
linguistic picture of the world, language contacts, intercultural communication, borderland, diaspora, Russian abroad
1. Baldandorzhiev Zh.B. Yazyk russkogo zarubezh'ya v Kitae kak otrazhenie deystvitel'nosti v mezhkul'turnoy kommunikacii: setevoy yazyk [Tekst] / Zh.B. Baldandorzhiev, Van Yuan'in' // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2020. — № 44. — S. 377–383. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ESRCKB
2. Bereznickiy S.V. Karavannaya torgovlya Rossii s Kitaem i otechestvennaya nauka XVIII veka [Tekst] / S.V. Bereznickiy. — SPb.: MAE RAN, 2017. — 266 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YRODSN
3. Bolsunovskaya Yu.A. Russkie i angliyskie zaimstvovaniya v kitayskom yazyke [Tekst] / Yu.A. Bolsunovskaya, T.U. Matnazarov, L.M. Bolsunovskaya // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2015. № 8. — S. 1099–1101. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TPUJFB
4. Bol'shoy enciklopedicheskiy slovar' [Tekst]. — URL: https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/enc3p (data obrascheniya:05.03.2025).
5. Bondareva V.V. Dvizhenie «krasnoy ohrany» v pervye gody «kul'turnoy revolyucii» v Kitae (1966–1967): vzglyad otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh issledovateley [Tekst] / V.V. Bondareva // Nauchnyy dialog. — 2020. — № 8. S. 346–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-346-366; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BMSYUJ
6. Borisova O.S. Puti i istochniki zaimstvovaniya v kitayskom yazyke [Tekst] / O.S. Borisova // Al'manah sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. — 2008. — Vyp. 8-1. — S. 21–25. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PBYYMX
7. Vorob'eva S.V. K voprosu o klassifikacii zaimstvovannoy leksiki [Tekst] / S.V. Vorob'eva // Lingvokul'turologicheskaya paradigma v sovremennyh issledovaniyah: sb. nauch. statey / GrGu im. Yanki Kupaly; redkol.: V.S. Istomin (otv. red.) [i dr.]. — Grodno: Izd-vo GrGU, 2011. S. 208–214.
8. Ven Czyatun. Istoriya slova shelk v Kitae i Rossii [Tekst] / Ven Czyatun // Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoy filologii i zhurnalistiki. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 16–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36622/AQMPJ.2022.88.39.002; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YZWQFE
9. Gun Ley. Russkie zaimstvovannye slova v kitayskom yazyke [Tekst] / Gun Ley // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. — 2018. — T. 23. — № 1. — S. 244–252. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TICJAL
10. Kasymova O.P. Process zaimstvovaniya v kitayskom i russkom yazykah [Tekst] / O.P. Kasymova, Gun Ley // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. — 2018. — T. 23. — № 1. S. 121–124. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVODXS
11. Kirillova S.V. Besposhlinnaya i kontrabandnaya torgovlya Rossii s Kitaem i Mongoliey v XVII–XVIII vv. [Tekst] / S.V. Kirillova // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. — 2018. — № 53. — S. 138–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/53/26; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTBGCT
12. Kononova E.A. Zaimstvovaniya kak faktor kul'turnoy dinamiki [Tekst] / E.A. Kononova, O.Yu. Levashkina // Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta. — 2008. — № 3. S. 35–39. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SZBWWV
13. Kotrikadze E.V. Rol' zaimstvovaniy v mezhkul'turnoy kommunikacii [Tekst] / E.V. Kotrikadze, L.I. Zharkova // Mir nauki. — 2018. — T. 6. — № 2. — URL: https://mir-nauki. com (data obrascheniya: 10.04.2025). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XSMVAL
14. Li Syci. Obschestvenno-politicheskaya leksika kitayskogo proishozhdeniya v russkom yazyke [Tekst] / Li Syci // Politicheskaya lingvistika. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 205–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/pl19-06-26; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OOYLXG
15. Lingvisticheskiy enciklopedicheskiy slovar' [Tekst] / Gl.red. V.N. Yarceva. — M.: Sovetskaya enciklopediya, 1990. 685 s.
16. Madmarova G.A. Zaimstvovaniya v yazyke kak rezul'tat mezhkul'turnogo vzaimodeystviya narodov [Tekst] / G.A. Madmarova, G.Z. Mamytova, Z.M. Sabiralieva, M. Nusuratilda // International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. — 2022. — Vol. 6-3. — S. 51–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2022-6-3-51-54; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WRZCRM
17. Perfil'eva N.V. Razlichnye traktovki zaimstvovaniya v rabotah kitayskih lingvistov [Tekst] / N.V. Perfil'eva, Hu Peypey // Sovremennye issledovaniya social'nyh problem. — 2012. — № 8. — URL: www.sisp.nkras.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.04.2025).
18. Sen'ko E.V. Kitayskie slova v sovremennom russkom yazyke: semanticheskiy aspekt [Tekst] / E.V. Sen'ko // Filologicheskiy klass. — 2019. — № 3. — S. 59–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/FK19-03-08; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TXTKYD
19. Sen'ko E.V. Sovremennaya teoriya zaimstvovaniya: terminologicheskiy aspekt [Tekst] / E.V. Sen'ko, A.S. Chekoeva // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. — № 2. — S. 194–197. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XSMHFB
20. Czyan Syuehua. Kitaizmy v yazyke russkogo zarubezh'ya pervoy poloviny XX veka [Tekst] / Czyan Syuehua // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. — 2018. — T. 10. — Vyp. 4. — S. 79–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2037-6681-2018-4-79-86; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VPETNV
21. Czyan Syuehua. Ekstralingvisticheskie prichiny zaimstvovaniya kitayskoy leksiki russkim yazykom [Tekst] / Czyan Syuehua // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. — 2019. — T. 12. — Vyp. 5. — S. 152–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.5.32; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IVYAOR
22. Czyan In. Russkie zaimstvovaniya v kitayskom yazyke kak rezul'tat yazykovyh kontaktov [Tekst] / Czyan In, L.M. Shipanovskaya // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Gramota. — 2016. — № 7: v 3 ch. Ch. 1. — C. 144–152. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VZANMX
23. Chzhan Ke. Ponimanie termina zaimstvovannoe slovo v russkoy i kitayskoy lingvistike [Tekst] / Chzhan Ke // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. 2017. — T. 8. — № 3. — S. 724–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2017-8-3-724-734; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZIONGX
24. Shepeleva I.M. Zaimstvovaniya kak odin iz rychagov kommunikacii i vzaimoproniknoveniya kul'tur [Tekst] / I.M. Shepeleva // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika. — 2017. — T. 6. № 4. — S. 48–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5976f491b90454.08617951; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZEKGAT
25. Yue Ten. Razlichie i funkcionirovanie sposobov zaimstvovaniya v sovremennom kitayskom i russkom yazykah [Tekst] / Yue Ten // Vestnik Vologodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: istoricheskie i filologicheskie nauki. — 2022. — № 4. — S. 100–103. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RXUDNP
26. Yan Si. Kitaizmy v sovremennyh rossiyskih SMI: semantika, grammatika, pragmatika [Tekst] / Yan Si // Praktiki i interpretacii: zhurnal filologicheskih, obrazovatel'nyh i kul'turnyh issledovaniy. — 2017. — T. 2 (1). S. 222–231. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZBKBNJ
27. Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics. Volume 2: De–Med: Loanwords from Russian / General Editor Rint Sybesma. Brill: Leiden, Boston, 2017, pp. 638–641. URL: https://www.academia.edu/37494275/Loanwords_from_Russian
28. Magami A. Concepts of Borrowings in Modern Science of Linguistics, Reasons of Borrowed Words and Some of Their Theoretical Problems in General Linguistics. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2015. No. 5. Pp. 157–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n6p157
29. Mahmudova Z.Sh.Q., Ibragimova S.M. Types of borrowed words. Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS). 2022. Vol. 2. Issue 1. Pp. 129–132.
30. Mazhitayeva S., Tazhikeyeva A., Khan N., Ayazbaeva B., Tuite E., Nygmetova N., Sembiyev K., Kenzhegaliyev S. Lexicon and national realias: borrowed words, loan words, exoticisms, anglicism. 2014. Life Science Journal. No. 11(6s). Pp. 122–128. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XNFYRR
31. Mikheeva N.F., Petrova M.G. On the Role of Loanwords in Modern Russian. Cuadernos de Rusística Española. 2020. No. 16. Pp. 115–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v16i0.10225; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RQATJP
32. Usmonova G., Jumaboyeva U.H. Classification of borrowings according to the development of the language // Ekonomika i socium. — 2021. — № 3. — Ch. 1. — S. 333–336.
33. Usmonova G., Moydinova Sh., Sotivoldieva M. The impact of historical events on the development of English vocabulary. Scientific progress. 2021.Vol. 1. Issue 4. Pp. 177–181.
