Moscow, г. Москва и Московская область, Россия
Moscow, г. Москва и Московская область, Россия
Today, the food industry widely uses both animal and plant proteins. Animal proteins have a balanced amino acid composition, while plant proteins have more pronounced functional properties. However, both types of proteins can act as allergens, which limits their practical application. Therefore, we aimed to select optimal conditions for obtaining hypoallergenic mixtures based on casein hydrolysates and gluten proteins, which have good functional properties and a balanced amino acid composition. We used wheat flour (Makfa, Russia) with 12.6% of crude protein and 69.4% of starch, as well as rennet casein (Atletic Food, Russia) with 90% of protein. The methods included the Lowry method, the Anson method, Laemmli electrophoresis, ion-exchange chromatography, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Protex 6L was an optimal enzyme preparation for the hydrolysis of gliadin, while chymotrypsin was optimal for the hydrolysis of glutenin and casein. The optimal amount for all the enzymes was 40 units/g of substrate. We analyzed the effect of casein, glutenin, and gliadin enzymolysis time on the functional properties of the hydrolysates and found that the latter had relatively low water- and fat-holding capacities. The highest foaming capacity was observed in gliadin hydrolysates, while the highest emulsifying capacity was registered in casein and glutenin hydrolysates. Further, protein enzymolysis significantly decreased allergenicity, so the hydrolysates can be used to obtain functional additives for hypoallergenic products. Finally, the mixtures of casein hydrolysate and gliadin or glutenin hydrolysates had a balanced amino acid composition and a high amino acid score. Also, they retained high emulsifying and foaming capacities. The study proved the need for mixtures based on wheat protein and casein hydrolysates, which have good functional properties and hypoallergenicity.
Gliadin, glutenin, casein, allergenicity, functional foods, enzymatic hydrolysis, amino acid score
1. Ashfaq A, Jahan K, Islam RU, Younis K. Protein-based functional colloids and their potential applications in food: A review. LWT. 2022;154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112667
2. Sá AGA, Moreno YMF, Carciofi BAM. Plant proteins as high-quality nutritional source for human diet. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2020;97:170-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.011
3. Baskar N, Varadharajan S, Rameshbabu M, Ayyasamy S, Velusamy S. Development of plantbased yogurt. Foods and Raw Materials. 2022;10(2):274-282. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2022-2-537
4. Zhang T, Dou W, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Jiang L, et al. The development history and recent updates on soy protein-based meat alternatives. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;109:702-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.060
5. Bakaeva NP, Korzhavina NYu. Method for extraction of protein and its fractions from grains of winter wheat of Volga-86 variety. Vestnik of Buryat State Academy of Agriculture named after V. Philippov. 2015;40(3):7-11. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/UHSJRD
6. Ortolan F, Urbano K, Netto FM, Steel CJ. Chemical and structural characteristics of proteins of non-vital and vital wheat glutens. Food Hydrocolloids. 2022;125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107383
7. Kontopidis G, Holt C, Sawyer L. Invited review: β-lactoglobulin: Binding properties, structure, and function. Journal of Dairy Science. 2004;87(4):785-796. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73222-1
8. Saadi S, Saari N, Ghazali HM, Abdulkarim SM, Hamid AA, Anwar F. Gluten proteins: Enzymatic modification, functional and therapeutic properties. Journal of Proteomics. 2022;251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104395
9. García-García A, Madrid R, González I, García T, Martín R. A novel approach to produce phage single domain antibody fragments for the detection of gluten in foods. Food Chemistry. 2020;321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126685
10. Mulder CJJ, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bakker SF, Wierdsma N, Bouma G. Gluten-free diet in glutenrelated disorders. Digestive Diseases. 2013;31:57-62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000347180
11. Yao Y, Jia Y, Lu X, Li H. Release and conformational changes in allergenic proteins from wheat gluten induced by high hydrostatic pressure. Food Chemistry. 2022;368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130805
12. Kurbatova EI, Rimareva LV, Sokolova EN, Davydkina VE, Serba EM, Pogorzhelʹskaya NS, et al. Reducing the allergenicity of wheat proteins based on their biocatalytic conversion. Problems of Nutrition. 2016;85(S2). (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/XCFEVJ
13. Gutiérrez S, Peres-Andres J, Martinez-Blanco H, Ferrero MA, Vaquero L, Vivas S, et al. The human digestive tract has proteases capable of gluten hydrolysis. Molecular Metabolism. 2017;6(7):693-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2017.05.008
14. Heredia-Sandoval NG, Valencia-Tapia MY, de la Barca AMC, Islas-Rubio AR. Microbial proteases in baked goods: Modification of gluten and effects on immunogenicity and product quality. Foods. 2016;5(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5030059
15. Wusigale, Liang L, Luo Y. Casein and pectin: Structures, interactions, and applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2020;97:391-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.027
16. Casanova F, Nascimento LGL, Silva NFN, de Carvalho AF, Gaucheron F. Interactions between caseins and food-derived bioactive molecules: A review. Food Chemistry. 2021;359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129820
17. Souza Júnior EC, Santos MPF, Sampaio VS, Ferrão SPB, Fontan RCI, Bonomo RCF, et al. Hydrolysis of casein from different sources by immobilized trypsin on biochar: Effect of immobilization method. Journal of Chromatography B. 2020;1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122124
18. Liyanaarachchi WS, Vasiljevic T. Caseins and their interactions that modify heat aggregation of whey proteins in commercial dairy mixtures. International Dairy Journal. 2018;83:43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.03.006
19. Khan IT, Nadeem M, Imran M, Ullah R, Ajmal M, Jaspal MH. Antioxidant properties of milk and dairy products: a comprehensive review of the current knowledge. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2019;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-019-0969-8
20. Lordan R, Tsoupras A, Mitra B, Zabetakis I. Dairy fats and cardiovascular disease: Do we really need to be concerned? Foods. 2018;7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7030029
21. Melnikova EI, Stanislavskaya EB, Bogdanova EV, Shabalova ED. Micellar casein production and application in dairy protein industry. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2022;52(3):592-601. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-3-2389
22. Vesnina A, Prosekov A, Kozlova O, Atuchin V. Genes and eating preferences, their roles in personalized nutrition. Genes. 2020;11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040357
23. Linhart B, Freidl R, Elisyutina O, Khaitov M, Karaulov A, Valenta R. Molecular approaches for diagnosis, therapy and prevention of cow´s milk allergy. Nutrients. 2019;11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071492
24. Hochwallner H, Schulmeister U, Swoboda I, Spitzauer S, Valenta R. Cow’s milk allergy: From allergens to new forms of diagnosis, therapy and prevention. Methods. 2014;66(1):22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.08.005
25. Sun Z, Wang M, Han S, Ma S, Zou Z, Ding F, et al. Production of hypoallergenic milk from DNA-free beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) gene knockout cow using zinc-finger nucleases mRNA. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32024-x
26. Kumar D, Chatli MK, Singh R, Mehta N, Kumar P. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of camel milk casein hydrolysates and its fractions. Small Ruminant Research. 2016;139:20-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.05.002
27. Izadi A, Khedmat L, Mojtahedi SY. Nutritional and therapeutic perspectives of camel milk and its protein hydrolysates: A review on versatile biofunctional properties. Journal of Functional Foods. 2019;60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.103441
28. Vorob’ev MM. Quantification of two-step proteolysis model with consecutive demasking and hydrolysis of peptide bonds using casein hydrolysis by chymotrypsin. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2013;74:60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.02.020
29. Du X, Jing H, Wang L, Huang X, Wang X, Wang H. Characterization of structure, physicochemical properties, and hypoglycemic activity of goat milk whey protein hydrolysate processed with different proteases. LWT. 2022;159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113257
30. Xing Y, Giosafatto CVL, Fusco A, Dong M, Mariniello L. Combined lactic fermentation and enzymatic treatments affect the antigenicity of β-lactoglobulin in cow milk and soymilk-cow milk mixture. LWT. 2021;143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111178
31. Kataria A, Sharma R, Sharma S, Singh B, Kaur G, Yakubu CM. Recent applications of bio-engineering principles to modulate the functionality of proteins in food systems. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;113:54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.055
32. Prikhodʹko DV, Krasnoshtanova AA. A study of the functional properties of wheat gluten fractions. Scientific achievements of the third millennium: Collection of scientific papers on materials XIII International Scientific Conference; 2021; New York. New York: SPC LJournal; 2021. p. 161-165. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18411/scienceconf-03-2021-30
33. Kurbanova MG. Enzymatic hydrolysis of milk proteins with various proteases use. Bulletin of KSAU. 2010;40(1):157-160. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/LADHZX
34. Babich OO, Razumnikova IS, Poletaev AYu, Morozova AI. Keratin containing waste processing and manufacture of albuminous hydrolysates for food and fodder purposes. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2011;21(2):7-11. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/NYGVEB
35. Vasilevskaya ER, Aryuzina MA, Vetrova ES. Saline extraction as a method of obtaining a mixture of biologically active compounds of protein nature from a porcine pancreas. Food Systems. 2021;4(2):97-105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2020-4-2-97-105
36. Kamilov FKh, Galimov ShN, Agletdinov EhF, Knyazeva OA, Abdullina GM, Karyagina NT, et al. Biochemical practicum: a manual for student classroom work (020400.62 Biology, Microbiology. Part II). Ufa: Bashkir State Medical University; 2014. 99 p. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/XPDBCX
37. Evdokimova OV, Griminova EB, Tolkunova NN, Pryanishnikov VV. Functional and technological properties of protein preparations. Izvestiya Vuzov. Food Technology. 2006;291-292(2-3):73-74. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/KVKZRL
38. Nasri R, Abdelhedi O, Nasri M, Jridi M. Fermented protein hydrolysates: Biological activities and applications. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2022;43:120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2021.11.006
39. Prosekov AYu, Ulrih EV, Noskova SYu, Budrik VG, Botina SG, Agarkova EYu, et al. The getting enzymatic whey protein hydrolyzate using proteolitic enzyme. Fundamental Research. 2013;(6-5):1089-1093. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/OLLOIH
40. Golovach TN, Kurchenko VP. Allergenicity of milk proteins and ways to reduce it. Proceedings of the Belarusian State University. Series of Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Biology Sciences. 2010;5(1):9-55. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/ZDDSUH
41. Sviridenko YuYa, Myagkonosov DS, Abramov DV, Ovchinnikova EG. Theoretical and practical aspects of development technology of manufacturing protein hydrolyzates for special nutrition use. Part 2. Functional properties of protein hydrolysates that depend on the specificity of proteolytic processes. Food Industry. 2017;(6):50-53. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/YRXEBF
