Russian Federation
UDC 32
The purpose of this work is to study the conditions, causes and directions of transformation of the welfare state in the context of the crisis of normative legitimacy caused by changes in global and national political and economic contexts. The main research method is the discourse analysis, which allowed to identify normative and conceptual shifts in the interpretation of the categories of justice, solidarity and responsibility. Auxiliary methods include hermeneutic analysis of philosophical and political science concepts, as well as elements of a retrospective approach to identify the evolution of the idea of a welfare state from the classical universalist model to modern fragmented and algorithmically mediated forms of social policy. The paper reveals the institutional and regulatory restructuring of the welfare state under the influence of the processes of digitalization, managerial rationalization and cultural fragmentation. The conclusion is drawn that the modern welfare state is losing the former universalist foundations of legitimation and is shifting to hybrid models of redistribution and interaction with citizens. The authors emphasize the need to develop multi-level, "global" social policy strategies capable of combining global standards and local practices to preserve social justice and strengthen institutional legitimacy. The theoretical significance of the work consists in clarifying the parameters of the crisis of the normative legitimacy of the welfare state and rethinking its conceptual foundations. The practical significance lies in the possibility of applying the results in the development of models of "post-social" public policy, taking into account the current challenges of the digital age and global interdependence.
welfare state, normative legitimacy, digitalization, hermeneutics, discourse analysis, social policy, institutional transformation
1. Aramisov T.R. Krizis sovremennogo social'nogo gosudarstva: filosofskiy analiz prichin i posledstviy // Sbornik statey Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Kabardino-Balkarskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. H.M. Berbekova. – Nal'chik, 2023. – S. 30–34. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GUUHKE
2. Gluhova A.V. Novye krizisy, social'nye razmezhevaniya, diskursivnye konflikty i problema obschestvennogo edinstva v XXI veke // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2022. – № 3. – S. 36–56. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.03.02. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LAUMPX
3. Grishaeva S.A. Social'nye transformacii v usloviyah cifrovoy sredy // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. – 2020. – T. 26. - № 1. – S. 70–81. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-70-81. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DWLIGU
4. Klishas A.A. Sovremennaya koncepciya social'nogo gosudarstva. Monografiya. – M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2023. – 224 s.
5. Loskutova I.M., Sinyaev M.V., Panich N.A. Krizis social'nogo gosudarstva i riski evolyucii social'noy struktury // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. – 2020. – № 5 (147). – S. 18–22. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2020.5.2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UASIRS
6. Razd'yakonova E.V. Principy sovremennogo social'nogo gosudarstva v kontekste konstitucionnoy modernizacii // Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast'. – 2023. – № 3(29). – S. 64–73. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SWVBEE
7. Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. – 228 p.
8. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992. – 260 p.
9. Bourdieu P. Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998. – 108 p.
10. Brown W. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books, 2015. – 45 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8
11. Dardot P., Laval C. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London: Verso, 2013. – 304 p.
12. Eubanks V. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2017. – 288 p.
13. Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage, 1977. – 333 p.
14. Fraser N. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008. – 224 p.
15. Fukuyama F. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014. – 658 p.
16. Glasius M. Solidarity in the age of platforms. European Journal of Social Theory. 2022, V. 25(4), pp. 567–586. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310221076309.
17. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996. – 676 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
18. Hardt M., Negri A. Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009. – 434 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h
19. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. – 256 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
20. Herd P., Moynihan D.P. Administrative Burdens in the Social Safety Net. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2025. V. 39, I. 1, pp. 129–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20231394. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJPCTJ
21. Holler R., Tarshish N. Administrative Burden in Citizen-State Encounters: The Role of Waiting, Communication Breakdowns and Administrative Errors. Social Policy and Society. 2022. V. 23, I. 3, pp. 593–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000355.
22. Jessop B. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002. – 279 p.
23. Morozov E. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. London: Allen Lane, 2013. – 368 p.
24. Peeters R., Widlak T. Administrative exclusion in the infrastructure-level bureaucracy: lessons from the Dutch day-care benefit scandal. Public Administration Review. 2023, V. 83, I. 4, pp. 863–877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13615. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TWFEFB
25. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971. – 607 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
26. Zuboff, S. Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization. Organization Theory, 2022, V. 3, I. 79, pp. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BKUYSE
