graduate student
Russian Federation
UDC 33
The article is devoted to the formation of a typology of scientific and technological infrastructure in order to improve the efficiency of management of its spatial development in the regions of Russia. The study found that the registers of scientific and technological infrastructure objects in Russia have significant discrepancies. It is noted that the National rating of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation subjects focuses on infrastructure facilities created within the framework of government programs, and often does not take into account the initiatives of business, universities and regional authorities, which leads to the underestimation of the unique potential of territories. According to the results of the analysis, three criteria for the typology of scientific and technological infrastructure were identified: functional purpose, organizational structure, and initiator of creation. In accordance with them, 29 key infrastructure objects were selected and systematized. It is shown that their spatial distribution is characterized by a pronounced concentration in a limited number of western regions of Russia.
scientific and technological infrastructure, innovation infrastructure, infrastructure typology, infrastructure objects, scientific and technological development, regional development
1. Itskovits G. Triple Helix Model // Innovations. 2011, no. 4, pp. 5–10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PDUAQF
2. Smyslova O.Yu., Ivanova N.V. Development of Regional Innovation Systems in the Context of Spatial-Economic Transformations // Bulletin of NGIEI. 2021, no. 8 (123), pp. 96–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2227-9407-2021-8-96-111; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UBLGCB
3. Kuznetsova O.V. Scientific and Technological Priorities in the Federal Policy of Spatial Development in Russia // Federalism. 2023, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 5–20.
4. Sukhovey A.F. Innovation Infrastructure as a Driver of Socio-Economic Development: Global and Domestic Experience // Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2014, no. 45 (396), pp. 11–19. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SZUTVL
5. Khodyreva M.V. Arctic Regions in the Rankings of Scientific, Technological, and Innovative Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation // Problems of Modern Economics. 2024, no. 2 (90), pp. 115–120. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KAZCSR
6. What Hinders Russian Business from Developing Innovations? // National Research University Higher School of Economics. – URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/707355866.pdf (accessed: 27.04.2025).
7. Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. Geography of Innovation Processes in Russia // Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5: Geography. 2013, no. 5, pp. 25–32. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RQDSDR
8. Volkova N.N., Romanyuk E.I. Ranking of Scientific and Technological Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023, no. 2, pp. 50–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_50_72; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QBNXNT
