Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
This article explores the paradoxical discourse of sustainability reporting, which is characterized by significant costs associated with sustainable practices yet lacks direct economic benefit from such investments. The paper aims to resolve this paradox through a linguistic lens and seeks to understand the motivations behind the publication of sustainability reports. The primary value of the study lies in assessing the role of these reports within corporate communication: whether they genuinely and objectively provide information on sustainability or are more akin to tools of public relations and marketing. The article tests this assumption by analyzing the use of optimistic linguistic strategies in corporate sustainability reports compared to other types of official documentation. The research underscores the importance of establishing unified standards for sustainability reporting, which could lead to greater transparency within corporations.
content analysis, sustainability, corporate reports, corporate communication, greenwashing, linguistic strategies of optimism
1. Abdelrehim N. (2014). Managerial disclosures and corporate control. In R.P. Hart (Ed.), Communication and language analysis in the corporate world (pp. 163–178). IGI Global.
2. Alexa M., Zuell C (2000). Text analysis software: Commonalities, differences and limitations: The results of a review. Quality & Quantity, 34(3), 299–321. URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740203542
3. Allam I., Scagnelli S., Corazza L. (2020). Sustainability reporting, a new type of companies’ hypocrisy: Zara and Volkswagen cases. In B. Díaz Díaz, N. Capaldi, S.O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Responsible business in a changing world: CSR, sustainability, ethics and governance (pp. 195–211). Springer. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36970-5_12
4. Alves C.F., Silva A.L. (2021). Corporate communication and media coverage of abnor- mal returns: Evidence from the Portuguese capital market. Corporate Communications: An iinterna tional Journal, 26(2), 248–264. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ CCIJ-11-2019-0132
5. Babbie E.R. (2016). The practice of social research (14 th ed.).
6. Becker R.A., Pasurka C., Jr., Shadbegian R.J. (2013). Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures Survey. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3), 523–538. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.08.001
7. Burke K. (1970). The rhetoric of religion: Studies in logology.
8. Chen Y.-S., Chang C.-H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0
9. Chr. Hansen. (2019). Sustainability report 2018/2019: Communication on progress. URL: https://www.chrhansen.com/_/media/files/chrhansen/home/sustainability/reporting-and-disclosure/2018-19/chr-hansen-sustainability-report-2018-19.pdf
10. Cisco Systems. (2019). 2019 Corporate social responsibility report. URL: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/about/csr/csr-report/2019/_pdf/csr-report-2019.pdf
11. Corporate Knights. (n.d.). About us. https://www.corporateknights.com/us/about-us
12. Corporate Knights. (2020). The 2020 Global 100: Overview of Corporate Knights rating methodology. URL: https://www.corporateknights.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2020-Global-100_Methodology.pdf
13. DICTION. (n.d.-a). Published materials. https://dictionsoftware.com/published-studies/ DICTION. (n.d.-b). What is DICTION? URL: https://dictionsoftware.com/diction-overview
14. Eberhart D. (2020, June 4). EPA proposal addresses hidden cost of regulations on small businesses. Forbes. URL: https://www. forbes.com/sites/daneberhart/2020/06/04/epa-proposal-addresses-hidden-cost-of-regulations-on-small-businesses
15. Fisher-Vanden K., Thorburn K.S. (2011). Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62 (3), 430–445. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.003
16. Green S.E., Jr. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4), 653–669. URL: https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2004.14497653
17. Guo R., Tao L., Li C.B., Wang T. (2017). A path analysis of greenwashing in a trust crisis among Chinese energy companies: The role of brand legitimacy and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 140 (3), 523–536. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2672-7
18. Hart R.P. (1984). Verbal style and the presidency: A computer-based analysis. Academic Press.
19. Hart R.P. (Ed.). (2014a). Communication and language analysis in the corporate world. IGI-Global.
20. Hart R.P. (Ed.). (2014b). Communication and language analysis in the public sphere. IGI-Global.
21. Jacobs B.W., Singhal V.R., Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28 (5), 430–441. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.001
22. Jahdi K.S., Acikdilli G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (1), 103–113. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1
23. Kim E.-H., Lyon T.P. (2015). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26 (3), 633–940. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0949
24. Laskin A.V. (2018a). Investor relations and financial communication: The evolution of the profession. In A.V. Laskin (Ed.), Handbook of financial communication and investor relations (pp. 3–22). Wiley-Blackwell.
25. Laskin A.V. (2018b). The narrative strategies of winners and losers: Analyzing annual reports of publicly traded corporations. International Journal of Business Communication, 55 (3), .356. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418780221
26. Laskin A.V., Samoylenko S.A. (2014). The investor communication strategies of newspaper corporations: A computerized content analysis. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 8 (3), 196–214. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/155311 8X.2014.905479 University of California Press.
27. McKenny A.F., Aguinis H., Short J.C., Anglin A. H. (2018). What doesn’t get measured does exist: Improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management, 44 (7), 2909–2933. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316657594
28. McKenny A.F., Short J.C., Payne G.T. (2013). Using computer-aided text analysis to elevate constructs: An illustration using psychological capital. Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), 152–184. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112459910
29. Morris R. (1994). Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages and limitations. Journal of Management, 20 (4), 903–931. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90035-3
30. Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1
31. Neuendorf K.A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
32. Pashigian B.P. (1984). The effect of environmental regulation on optimal plant size and factor shares. Journal of Law & Economics, 27(1), 1–28. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/467056
33. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2006, December). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society-the-link-between-competitive-advantage-and-corporate-social-responsibility
34. Short J.C., McKenny A.F., Reid S.W. (2018). More than words? Computer-aided text analysis in organizational behavior and psychology research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 415–435. URL: https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104622
35. Short J.C., Palmer T.B. (2008). The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (4), 727–752. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107304534
36. Stern N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.
37. Sydserff R., Weetman P. (2002). Developments in content analysis: A transitivity index and DICTION scores. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (4), 523–545. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210440586
38. Symon G. (2008). Developing the political perspective on technological change through rhetorical analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 22 (1), 74–98. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908318514
39. Szabo S., Webster J. (2021). Perceived greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171 (4), 719–739. URL: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-020-04461-0
40. Thomas C., Degenhart A., Wohlgemuth K. (2020). Is bad news difficult to read? A readability analysis of differently connoted passages in the annual reports of the 30 DAX companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34 (2), 157–187. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919892312
41. Tortola P.D., Pansardi P. (2019). The charismatic leadership of the ECB presidency: A language-based analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (1), 96–116. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12272
