graduate student
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
GRNTI 10.00 ГОСУДАРСТВО И ПРАВО. ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
OKSO 40.00.00 Юриспруденция
The article deals with the problematic issue of reading out the testimony of victims and witnesses given by them during the preliminary investigation and who did not appear at the hearing. Existing problems are considered, including violation of the principles of competitiveness and equality of the parties. Since the side of the defense does not participate in the interrogation of the witness and the victim, in this case it cannot challenge their testimony in pre-trial proceedings, and the prosecution cannot use it in full to confirm its position. The possibility of using audio and video recordings of the production of investigative actions in pre-trial proceedings creates the need to change the existing conditions for the disclosure of the testimony of victims and witnesses in court. The article proposes the author's idea of achieving the implementation of the principles of criminal justice. The positive experience of using audio and video recording materials used in the production of investigative actions as evidence is shown, in connection with which it is concluded that they are given independent evidentiary value as an equivalent alternative to the protocol of the investigative action, and the need, in view of this, to introduce new conditions for the disclosure of the testimony of participants in the course of judicial trial.
reading out the testimonies of victims and witnesses, audio and video recording, interrogation, proof, side of the defense, investigative actions, principle of competition and equality of arms
1. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 01.11.2016 № 127-APU16-14 // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/apelliatsionnoe-opredelenie-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-01112016-n-127-apu16-14/?ysclid=liegu5ue1m286649509 (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2023).
2. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 26.01.2023 g. po delu № 2-28/17 // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://sudact.ru/vsrf/doc/6jWiRG25fNoz/ (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2023).
3. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii po delu №_33-APU 14-20 ot 14.10.2014 g. // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://www.zakonrf.info/suddoc/48203a77321a94cc4bba629d09548f4d/?ysclid=liikybb7i7678539253 (data obrascheniya: 06.06.2023).
4. Belkin A.R. Kriminalisticheskaya enciklopediya. M., BEK, 1997. S. 310.
5. Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika: uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. R.S. Belkina. M.: Norma, 2001. S. 990. // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://lawbook.online/osnovyi-kriminalistiki/ponyatie-znachenie-vidyi-70839.html (data obrascheniya 06.06.2023).
6. Vinogradova, S. L. Yuridicheskie kollizii ispol'zovaniya audio- i videozapisi v ugolovnom processe / S. L. Vinogradova // Pravoohranitel'naya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennih del v kontekste sovremennyh nauchnyh issledovaniy: Materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 17 dekabrya 2021 goda / Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2022. S. 46-50.
7. Voskobitova L.A. Ispol'zovanie funkcional'nogo podhoda dlya cifrovizacii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina. 2020. № 10. S.34-51.
8. Zorin G.A. Ispol'zovanie kriminalisticheskih igr, inversiy, effektov i takticheskih lovushek pri rassledovanii, obvinenii i zaschite po ugolovnym delam. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie // M.: Izdatel'stvo «Yurlitinform», 2002. S. 44.
9. Kaygarodova Yu.E., Timoshenko S.E. Videozapis' sledstvennyh deystviy kak mera predotvrascheniya protivodeystviya rassledovaniyu // Problemy kriminalisticheskoy nauki, sledstvennoy i ekspertnoy praktiki. Omsk. 2017. S. 48-53.
10. Karagodin V.N. Preodolenie protivodeystviya predvaritel'nomu rassledovaniyu. Sverdlovsk, 1992. S.25.
11. Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 14.01.2010 № 23610/03) po delu "Mel'nikov protiv Rossiyskoy Federacii"// [Elektronnyy resurs]URL:http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=156817#TGI79uSVqMGB8zD7 (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2023).
12. Prigovor gorodskogo suda goroda Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy № 1-87/2020 ot 6 maya 2020 g. po delu № 1-87/2020 // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qjpB1O1OzIWZ/? (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2023).
13. Prigovor Sherbakul'skogo rayonnogo suda Omskoy oblasti №1-47/2022 ot 29 noyabrya 2022 goda // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/o788wwbnv7Hi/ (data obrascheniya: 06.06.2023).
14. Smirnov A. V., Kalinovskiy K. B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-processual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii: postateynyy. St. 281 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus», 2012. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://kalinovsky-k.narod.ru/p/kom-5/kom-6.html?ysclid=lika29y6x8921204510 (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2023).
15. Ekonomicheskiy i Social'nyy Sovet OON. Rezolyuciya 2005/20 ot 22.07.2005 «Rukovodyaschie principy, kasayuschihsya pravosudiya v voprosah, svyazannyh s uchastiem detey-zhertv i svideteley prestupleniy» // [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://www.refworld.org.ru/docid/528a1bfa4.html (data obrascheniya: 03.04.2023).
