Russian Federation
Russian Federation
student
Russian Federation
The article discusses doctrinal approaches to determining the probative value of the results of psychophysiological studies using a polygraph, as well as judicial practice, which allows determining the position of the courts regarding the assessment of the conclusions of polygraph examiners. The purpose of this study is to establish the reasons why the results of psychophysiological studies using a polygraph are not recognized as evidence, to determine further prospects for the use of a polygraph in proving in criminal cases. The arguments of scientists, practitioners «for» and «against» the conduct of psychophysiological forensic research using a polygraph in criminal proceedings are presented, examples of judicial practice are given. The study of judicial practice led to the conclusion that at present the courts are distrustful of the results of polygraph examinations and in many cases do not recognize them as admissible evidence in criminal cases. However, the authors state that the possibility of using a polygraph and psychophysiological studies in proving within the framework of a criminal process should not be completely rejected, but for this, first of all, it is necessary to adopt a special federal law regulating the forms and procedure for using such technologies in legal proceedings, as well as continue developing a complete and reliable method of psychophysiological research using a polygraph.
proof, psychophysiological research, polygraph, expert opinion, technical device, polygraph examiner
1. Zhivopisnaya Rossiya T. 12. Ch. 1: Vostochnye okrainy Rossii. Vostochnaya Sibir'. SPb. M., 1895. S. 324.
2. Bahteev D.V. Ob integracii sovremennyh tehnologiy v sledstvennuyu deyatel'nost' // Glagol' Pravosudiya. - 2022. - № 1(27). - S. 2-5.
3. O metodicheskom obespechenii proizvodstva psihofiziologicheskih ekspertiz i issledovaniy s primeneniem poligrafa / Ya.V. Komissarova, O.A. Kotova, V.V. Semenov, M.N. Tokarev // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy v sovremennyh usloviyah : materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Moskva, 28-29 yanvarya 2021 goda. - M. : RG-Press, 2021. - S. 132-136.
4. Detkov A.P., Svobodnyy F.K. Opredelenie predmeta, ob'ektov i kompetencii sudebnoy psihologicheskoy ekspertizy informirovannosti lichnosti o rassleduemom sobytii // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2015. - № 2-2(86). - S. 32-35.
5. Dolbyshev A.V. Neyrofiziologicheskie mehanizmy stressa // StudNet. - 2020. - T. 3. - № 7. - S. 163-167.
6. Ekman P. Psihologiya lzhi. - SPb.: Piter, 2010. - 196 s.
7. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona № 478780-5 «O primenenii poligrafa» (red., vnesennaya v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 24.12.2010) // Rezhim dostupa: sozd.duma.gov.ru
8. Holodnyy Yu.I. Primenenie poligrafa pri profilaktike, raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy. - M.: Mir bezopasnosti, 2000. - 157 s.
9. Stepanenko D.A., Yakovlev D.Yu. Rol' i mesto sudebnoy psihofiziologicheskoy ekspertizy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. - 2016. - № 1 (24). - S. 239-247.
10. Roganov S.A. Pravovye osnovy ispol'zovaniya poligrafa v pravoohranitel'noy deyatel'nosti Rossiyskoy Federacii: uchebnoe posobie. - SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGEU, 2018. - 67 s.
11. Aleksandrov I.A. Netradicionnye metody v praktike pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2020. - № 3(42). - S. 5-11.
12. Kitaev N.N., Arhipova A.N. O nezakonnom sposobe ispol'zovaniya rezul'tatov oprosa na poligrafe v pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti // Glagol' Pravosudiya. - 2011. - № 1 (2). - S. 21-24.
13. Nesterenko I.V. Processual'nye problemy provedeniya oprosov s ispol'zovaniem poligrafa // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. - 2010. - № 4. - S. 52-54.
14. Fray O. Detekciya lzhi i obmana. - SPb. : PRAYM-EVROZNAK, 2005. - 320 s.
15. Komissarova Ya.V., Kilesso E.G., Perch V.O. Kriminalistika + kriminalisty = opyt bor'by s prestupnost'yu. - M. : Yurlitinform, 2005. - 186 s.
16. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie Tambovskogo rayonnogo suda № 10-23/2020 ot 10 dekabrya 2020 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
17. Kassacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii № 33-UD22-11-A2 ot 28 iyunya 2022 g. // Rezhim dostupa: https://vsrf.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=2134162.
18. Maylis N.P., Holodnyy Yu.I. «O dokazatel'noy poligrafologii» // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. - 2022. - № 11. - S. 47-55.
19. Bystrov Yu.V. Rol' i dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie svedeniy, poluchennye v rezul'tate provedeniya psihofiziologicheskogo issledovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Yuridicheskiy vestnik DGU. - 2022. - T. 42, № 2. - S. 165-171.
20. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 21.12.2010 № 28 (red. ot 29.06.2021) «O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam» // URL: https://sudrf.ru.
21. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie Verhovnogo suda Respubliki Dagestan № 22-485/2022 ot 16 marta 2022 g. // Rezhim dostupa: https://sudrf.ru.
22. Komissarova Ya.V., Kotova O.A., Semenov V.V. Novoe v metodicheskom obespechenii deyatel'nosti poligrafologov Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federacii // Teoriya i praktika sovershenstvovaniya pravovyh, nauchno- metodicheskih i informacionnyh osnov ispol'zovaniya special'nyh znaniy v sudoproizvodstve: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, Ufa, 19 noyabrya 2020 g. / otv. red. F.G. Aminev. - Ufa: Bashkirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2020. - S. 63-74.
23. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie Lipeckogo oblastnogo suda № 22-641/2020 ot 9 iyunya 2020 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
24. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie Yarcevskogo gorodskogo suda № 10-16/2020 ot 13 noyabrya 2020 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
25. Prigovor Central'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Omska № 1-180/2020 ot 21 iyulya 2020 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
26. Prigovor Matveevo-Kurganskogo rayonnogo suda № 1-52/2020 ot 28 iyulya 2020 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
27. Prigovor Yarcevskogo gorodskogo suda № 1-2/2022 1-210/2020 1-28/2021 ot 21 fevralya 2022 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
28. Kriminalistika: uchebnik / T.V. Aver'yanova, R.S. Belkin, Yu.G. Koruhov, E.R. Rossinskaya. - M. : Norma: INFRA-M, 2023. - 928 s.
29. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie Stavropol'skogo kraevogo suda № 22- 3680/2020 ot 3 sentyabrya 2020 g. // URL: https://sudact.ru.
