CONCEPT COMPLEXITY W. WEAWER DIFFER FROM THE MODERN SCIENTISTS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The present paper shows that the term “complexity” includes absolutely different notions than now it seems to be presented in modern science and philosophy. Postnon-classics has come to this new recognition too close, but, actually, it is a new recognition of uncertainty for systems of the third type (not deterministic and not stochastic). We introduce the interpretation of a type I uncertainty that implies that stochastic methods show systems identified, but methods of the theory of chaos and self-organization and neurocomputing show significant difference of target systems (processes). With specific examples presented uncertainty of type 1 and gives an idea of the uncertainty of type 2, when the distribution function f (x) for different samples are the same. At the same neuro-computers not only divides the sample, but also shows the order parameters. In this case, at the same time solve the problem of system synthesis, which in society is now very difficult to solve (the basic model of social relations now – it´s deterministic society).

Keywords:
theory of chaos and self-organization, complexity, order parameter, systems of the third type.
Text

S. Lloyd представил 31 определение сложных систем, complexity (и попытался их расшифровать в своей книге), а определений «синергетики» сейчас существует даже больше. И этот скепсис понятен – что это за наука, в которой базовые понятия, предметы её изучения невозможно сформулировать чётко, а сами учёные, работающие в этой области знаний, между собой не могут (или не хотят) договориться? JohnHorgan [30] весьма определённо (и скептически) высказывается в адрес синергетики и complexity. Формулируя упрёки в адрес R. Pentroys относительно того, что журналисты и мировое сообщество слишком много уделили внимание синергетике (и complexity), J. Horgan иронизирует, опираясь на монографию известного физика SethLloyd о множественности определений самого понятия «сложности».

References

1. Arnol´d V.I. Matematicheskoe po-nimanie prirody.- M.: MTsNMO, 2009.- 144 s.

2. Budanov V.G. Sinergeticheskaya me-todologiya forsayta i modelirovaniya slozhnogo. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklas-sika.- 2013.- №1.- S.13-24.

3. Vatamova S.N., Vokhmina Yu.V., Dayanova D.D., Filatov M.A. Determinizm, stokhastika i teoriya khaosa-samoorganizatsii v opisanii statsionarnykh rezhimov slozhnykh biosistem. Slozhnost´. Razum. Post-neklassika.- 2013.- № 4.- S. 70-81.

4. Danielyan V.V., Karpin V.A., Filatov M.A. Postneklasicheskaya filoso-fiya kak metodologicheskoe osnovanie postroeniya sovremennoy evolyutsionnoy teorii. Filosofiya nauki.- 2013.- № 2.- S. 82-91.

5. Dzhumagalieva L.B., Gudkova C.A., Es´kov V.M., Khadartsev A.A. Filosofskiy podkhod v interpretatsii statsionarnykh re-zhimov sotsial´nykh sistem. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2014.- № 1.- S. 42-53.

6. Es´kov V.V., Vokhmina Yu.V., Gavri-lenko T.V., Zimin M.I. Modeli khaosa v fi-zike i teorii khaosa-samoorganizatsii. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2013.- № 2.- S. 42-56

7. Es´kov V.V., Vokhmina Yu.V., Gav-rilenko T.V., Zimin M.I. Modeli khaosa v fizike i teorii khaosa-samoorganizatsii. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2013.- № 2.- S. 42-56.

8. Es´kov V.V., Es´kov V.M., Kar-pin V.A., Filatov M.A. Sinergetika kak tret´ya paradigma, ili ponyatie paradigmy v filosofii i nauke. Filosofiya nauki.- 2011.- T. 51, № 4.- S. 126-128.

9. Es´kov V.M., Dzhumagalieva L.B., Gudkova S.A., Filatova O.E. Analiz pred-stavleniy I. R. Prigogine i J.A. Wheeler ot-nositel´no emerdzhentnosti biosistem s pozitsiy tret´ey paradigmy. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2014.- № 4.- S. 47-61.

10. Es´kov V.M., Es´kov V.V., Gavri-lenko T.V., Vakhmina Yu.V. Kinematika bio-sistem kak evolyutsiya: statsionarnye rezhi-my i skorost´ dvizheniya slozhnykh sistem - complexity. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 3. Fiz. Astron.- 2015.- № 2.

11. Es´kov V.M., Es´kov V.V., Kar-pin V.A., Filatov M.A. Sinergetika kak tret´ya paradigma, ili ponyatie paradigmy v filosofii i nauke.. Filosofiya nauki.- 2011.- №4.- S. 88-97.

12. Es´kov V.M., Es´kov V.V., Fila-tova O.E., Khadartsev A.A. Osobye svoystva biosistem i ikh modelirovanie. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy.- 2011.- № 3.- S. 331-332.

13. Es´kov V.M., Karpin V.A., Fila-tov M.A., Filatova O.E. Filosofskie os-novaniya teorii patologii: problema pri-chinnosti v meditsine. Filosofiya nauki.- 2012.- №1.- S.118-128.

14. Es´kov V.M., Popov Yu.M., Vo-khmina Yu.V. Sinergetika - zavershayushchaya stadiya razvitiya obshchey teorii sistem (OTS). Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassi-ka.- 2013.- № 2.- S. 29-40.

15. Es´kov V.M., Filatova O.E., Gud-kova S.A. Filosofskie i sotsial´nye as-pekty dinamiki razvitiya obrazovaniya i nauki v Yugre - tipichnyy primer regio-nal´nykh protsessov vo vsey Rossii. Slozh-nost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2014.- № 2.- S. 45-58.

16. Es´kov V.M., Filatova O.E., Dzhumagalieva L.B., Gudkova S.A. Analiz predstavleniy I. R. Prigogone i J.A. Whee-ler otnositel´no emerdzhentnosti biosis-tem s pozitsiy tret´ey paradigmy. Slozh-nost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2014.- № 4.- S. 47-61.

17. Es´kov V.M., Filatova O.E., Kha-dartsev A.A., Khadartseva K.A. Fraktal´naya dinamika povedeniya cheloveko-mernykh sis-tem. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhno-logiy.- 2011.- № 3.- S. 330-331.

18. Es´kov V.M., Khadartsev A.A., Es´kov V.V., Gavrilenko T.V., Filatov M.A. Complexity - osobyy tip biomedtsin-skikh i sotsial´nykh sistem. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy.- 2013.- № 1.- S. 17-22.

19. Es´kov V.M., Khadartsev A.A., Fi-latova O.E., Khadartseva K.A. Okolosutoch-nye ritmy pokazateley kardio-respiratornoy sistemy i biologicheskogo vozrasta cheloveka. Terapevt.- 2012.- № 8.- S. 36-44.

20. Karpin V.A., Es´kov V.V., Gud-kov A.V. Filosofsko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya teorii khronicheskogo patologi-cheskogo protsessa v aspekte sinergetiche-skoy paradigmy. Slozhnost´. Razum. Post-neklassika.- 2013.- № 3.- S. 46-54.

21. Kozupitsa G.S., Filatov M.A., Gudkov A.V, Gudkova S.A., Dzhumagalieva L.B. Nauka, psevdonauka, …, nenauka, lzhe-nauka, antinauka. Mesto sinergetiki v etoy posledovatel´nosti. Slozhnost´. Ra-zum. Postneklassika.- 2012.- № 1.- S. 57-70.

22. Es´kov V.M., Khadartsev A.A., Ka-menev L.I. Novye bioinformatsionnye podkhody v razvitii meditsiny s pozitsiy tret´ey paradigmy (personifitsirovannaya meditsina - realizatsiya zakonov tret´ey paradigmy v meditsine). Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy.- 2012.- № 3.- S. 25-28.

23. Rozenberg G.S. Vvedenie v teore-ticheskuyu ekologiyu / V 2-kh t.; Izd. 2-e, is-pravlennoe i dopolnennoe.- Tol´yatti: Kassandra, 2013.- 565 s.

24. Stepin V.S. Tipy nauchnoy ra-tsional´nosti i sinergeticheskaya para-digma. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2013.- № 4.- S. 45-59.

25. Filatov M.A., Filatova D.Yu., Poskina T.Yu., Strel´tsova T.V. Metody teorii khaosa-samoorganizatsii v psikhofi-ziologii. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklas-sika.- 2014.- № 1.- S. 17-33.

26. Filatova O.E., Khadartsev A.A., Es´kov V.V., Filatova D.Yu. Neopredelen-nost´ i neprognoziruemost´ - bazovye svoystva sistem v biomeditsine. Slozh-nost´. Razum. Postneklassika.- 2013.- № 1.- S. 68-82.

27. Khadartsev A.A., Filatova O.E., Dzhumagalieva L.B., Gudkova S.A. Ponyatie trekh global´nykh paradigm v nauke i so-tsiumakh. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassi-ka.- 2013.- № 3.- S. 35-45.

28. Eskov V.M. Evolution of the emer-gent properties of three types of societies: The basic law of human development, Emergence. Complexity and Self-organization.- 2014.- V. 16.- № 2.- P. 107-115.

29. Eskov V.M., Eskov V.V., Filato-va O.E. Characteristic features of measure-ments and modeling for biosystems in phase spaces of states. Measurement Techniques (Medical and Biological Measurements).- 2011.- V. 53 (12).- P. 1404-1410.

30. Horgan J. The End Of Science: Fac-ing The Limits Of Knowledge In The Twilight Of The Scientific Age. New York: Broadway Books, 1996.- 322 p.

31. Prigogine I. The Die Is Not Cast. Futures. Bulletin of the Word Futures Studies Federation.- 2000.- Vol. 25, № 4. - P. 17-19.

32. Weaver W. Science and Complexity. Rokfeller Foundation, New York City. American Scientist, 1948.- P. 36: 536-544.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?