In modern conditions, defined by most domestic and foreign researchers as the ‘new normal”, new approaches are being formed to ensure the scientific and technological development of economies at the macro, meso and micro levels. The rapid transformation of the main trends in the geopolitical and economic situation in the country, the change in the emphasis of the import substitution policy in the sectors of the national economy, have led to the complication of the tasks facing the domestic economy related to the need to form a new system of priorities for national and regional innovation policy. The authors of the article carried out work to identify global challenges, risks and potential threats of the agricultural development until 2030, as well as to form the prerequisites for the scientific and technological development of the market for scientific and technological initiatives (NTI) Foodnet. To understand the development of the NTI Foodnet market, the authors conducted a study of the prerequisites and reasons for the increased interest of foreign and domestic researchers in this article. In the study, the authors identified the factors for the creation and forming of the Foodnet market in the face of increased economic sanctions, geopolitical turbulence, and the growing problem of food security. The authors of the article made the assumption that this concept will solve the problems of import substitution of the agricultural industry of the regions of the Russian Federation through the introduction of new technologies and new principles for organizing the interaction of participants in the Foodnet market, which is open to the integration of new high technologies, through the introduction of new solutions based on digitalization and customization of agricultural products.
scientific and technological development; NTI market; Foodnet; agriculture 4.0.; digitalization; region
1. Weersink A., Fraser E., Pannell D., Duncan E. and Rotz S. Opportunities and challenges for big data in agricultural and environmental analysis //Annual Review Resource Economics. 2018. Vol. 10, P. 19-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053654.
2. Trendov N. M., Varas S. and Zeng M. Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas Status Report // Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2019. 152 p http://www.fao.org/3/ca4985en/ca4985en.pdf
3. Wolfert S., Ge L., Verdouw C. and Bogaardt M.-J. Big Data in Smart Farming - A review // Agricultural Systems. 2017. Vol. 153. P. 69-80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023.
4. Rose D. C., Chilvers J. Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming // Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2018. Vol. 2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087. https://www.frontiersin. org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087/full
5. Zhai Z., Martínez J. F., Beltran V. and Martínez N. L. Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges // Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020. Vol. 170: 105256. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105256
6. Kohlman O. I., Ivanova G. V., Yamskikh T. N., Ivanova A. N. and Nikulina E. O. Alternative raw materials for food industry // IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. Vol. 315. Issue 5: 052024. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/315/5/052024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335366726_Alternative_raw_materials_for_food_industry
7. Eugenio M. E., Ibarra D., Martín-Sampedro R., Espinosa E., Bascón I. and Rodríguez A. Alternative Raw Materials for Pulp and Paper Production in the Concept of a Lignocellulosic Biorefinery // Submitted. 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90041. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/69880.
8. Wild F., Czerny M., Janssen A. M and Kole A. P.W. The evolution of a plant-based alternative to meat: From niche markets to widely accepted meat alternatives // Agro Food Industry Hi Tech. 2014. Vol. 25, Issue 1. P. 45-49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261878915_The_evolution_of_a_plant-based_alternative_to_meat_From_niche_markets_to_widely_accepted_meat_alternatives
9. Walter A., Finger R., Huber R. and Buchmann N. Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture // Opinion. 2017. Vol. 114(24). P. 6148-6150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707462114. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1707462114
10. Floreano D., Wood R. J. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones // Nature. 2015. Vol. 521 (7553). P. 460-466. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14542
11. DeFries R., Franzo J., Remans R., Palm C., Wood S. and Anderman T. L. Global nutrition. Metrics for land-scarce agriculture // Science. 2015. Vol. 349 (6245). P. 238-240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5766.
12. Trendov N. M., Varas S. and Zeng M. Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas Status Report. 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/ca4985en/ca4985en.pdf
13. Muangprathub J., Boonnam N., Kajornkasirat S., Lekbangpong N., Wanichsombat A. and Nillaor P. IoT and agriculture data analysis for smart farm // Computers and Electronics Agriculture. 2019. Vol. 156. P. 467-474. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.011.
14. Sponchioni G., Vezzoni M., Bacchetti A., Pavesi M. and Renga F. The 4.0 revolution in agriculture: a multi-perspective definition // XXIV Summer School “Francesco Turco” - Industrial Systems Engineering. 2019. Vol. 1. P. 143-149. http://www.summerschool-aidi.it/edition-2019/cms/extra/papers/591.pdf
15. P'yankova S. G. Proektirovanie institucional'nogo razvitiya monoprofil'nyh territoriy // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2013. № 2(29). S. 133-141.
16. Wu L., Yue X., Jin A. and Yen D. C. Smart supply chain management: a review and implications for future research // The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2016. Vol. 27, Issue 2. P. 395-417. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0035
17. De Sousa Jabbour A. B. L., Jabbour C. J. C., Foropon C. and Godinho Filho M. When titans meet-Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018. Vol. 132. P. 18-25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017
18. Verma M., Hontecillas R., Tubau-Juni N., Abedi V. and Bassaganya-Riera J. Challenges in Personalized Nutrition and Health // Frontiers in Nutrition. 2018. Vol. 5: 117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00117. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6281760
19. Ordovas J. M., Ferguson L. R., Tai E. S. and Mathers J. C. Personalised nutrition and health // BMJ. 2018. Vol. 361: k2173. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2173. https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/361/bmj.k2173.full.pdf
20. Verain M. C. D., Bouwman E. P., Galama J. and Reinders M. J. Healthy eating strategies: Individually different or context-dependent? // Appetite. 2022. Vol. 168: 105759. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105759
21. Roy S., Nag S., Saini A. and Choudhury L. Association of human gut microbiota with rare diseases: A close peep through // Intractable & Rare Diseases Research. 2022. Vol. 11, Issue 2. P. 52-62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2022.01025
22. Franco R. Z., Fallaize R., Weech M., Hwang F. and A Lovegrove J. Effectiveness of Web-Based Personalized Nutrition Advice for Adults Using the eNutri Web App: Evidence From the EatWellUK Randomized Controlled Trial // Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2022. Vol. 24, Issue 4: e29088. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/29088. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35468093
23. Zhuchenko A. A. Biologizaciya, ekologizaciya, energosberezhenie, ekonomika sovremennyh sistem zemledeliya // Vestnik APK Stavropol'ya. 2015. № 52. S. 9-13.
24. Seufert V., Mehrabi Z., Gabriel D. and Benton T. G. Current and Potential Contributions of Organic Agriculture to Diversification of the Food Production System // Environmental Geography. 2019. Agroecosystem Diversity. Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality. Chapter 28. London. Academic Press. P. 435-452.
25. Orlova N. V., Nikolaev D. V. Russian agricultural innovations prospects in the context of global challenges: Agriculture 4.0. // Russian Journal of Economics. 2022. Vol. 8. Issue 1. P. 29-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.8.78430.
26. World Food and Agriculture // Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome, Italy. 368 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4477en. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/ru/c/cb4477en/
27. Schetchik naseleniya Zemli. https://countrymeters.info/ru/World
28. Kononova N. N. Perspektivy tehniko-tehnologicheskoy modernizacii sel'skogo hozyaystva: avtor. dis. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. ekon. nauk po special'nosti 08.00.05. Voronezh: Voronezhskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet im. Imperatora Petra I, 2020. 26 s.
29. Prognoz nauchno-tehnologicheskogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 goda. Ministerstvo sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossiyskoy Federacii, Nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M., 2017. 138 s. https://mcx.gov.ru/upload/iblock/264/264dfabe7e526b6a79ffe5697c34ed4f.pdf
