Globalization of international economic relations directly depends on the level of information technologies’ development. At present the development of information law has created favourable conditions for interpenetration of the rules of foreign law. This penetration is called diffusion in law. The article investigates the aspect of interpenetration of legal ideas and decisions through contracts concluded by participants in civil law relations. In business relations’ practice, parties frequently borrow not only legal language, but also legal structures from foreign contract forms. In case of a conflict situation there arises a problem of interpretation of th elegal formula which the parties have imported from a foreign law and copied in their contractual relations. Traditional approach assumes that a court, when interpreting contractual provisions, even imported from a foreign law, follows its law, i.e. lex fori. Development of international relations demonstrates imperfection of such approach, since such approach does not allow identifying the parties’ true intentions while concluding the contract. Development of international relations, amplification of economic relations results in the fact that the parties increasingly use international structures in their practice. For example, UNIDROIT Principles, to which the parties may refer in their contracts. But other states also use the UNIDROIT Principles and include them into their most recent codification. In such a way there appears “grass-root diffusion”, i.e. through the development of private contractions relations.
Contract law, contractual relations, private international law, classification in private international law, the UNIDROIT Principles 2010, unification.
1. EU Says New US CFTC Swaps Policy Clashes with Trans-Atlantic Agreement. World Securities Law Report. 2013. No. 12.
2. US Style: Home Country Rules. International & Financial Law Review. October 2012.
3. Vilkova N. G. Dogovornoe pravo v mezhdunarodnom oborote. M., 2004.
4. Gravin D. I. Dogovor bankovskogo kreditovaniya yuridicheskikh lits po angliyskomu i rossiyskomu pravu: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2013.
5. Gravin D. I. Dogovor bankovskogo kreditovaniya yuridicheskikh lits po angliyskomu i rossiyskomu pravu: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2013.
6. Komarov A. S. Progressivnoe razvitie unifikatsii pravovykh norm o mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh sdelkakh. Printsipy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh dogovorov UNIDRUA 2010. M., 2013.
7. Lazareva Yu. V. Otdel´nye vidy dogovorov na mezhdunarodnykh finansovykh rynkakh. Otdel´nye vidy obyazatel´stv v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. M., 2008.
8. Lunts L. A. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: v 3 t. M., 2002.
9. Printsipy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh dogovorov UNIDRUA 2010. M., 2013.
10. Semilyutina N. G. Dogovor kak instrument pravovogo regulirovaniya portfel´nykh investitsiy. Otdel´nye vidy obyazatel´stv v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. M., 2008.
11. Semilyutina N. G. Rossiyskiy rynok finansovykh uslug: formirovanie pravovoy modeli. M., 2005.
12. Semilyutina N. G. Formirovanie pravovoy modeli rossiyskogo rynka finansovykh uslug: avtoref. dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005.
13. Urudzhu I. Vospriyatie rasprostranennogo: chetyre kruga rasprostranennogo, vosprinyatogo v pravovoy sisteme Turtsii. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo i sravnitel´nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. № 1.
14. Khodykin R. M. Antiiskovye obespechitel´nye mery v tsivilisticheskom protsesse i mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe. Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo, sravnitel´nogo i grazhdanskogo prava, mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: Liber Amicorum v chest´ A. A. Kostina, O. N. Zimenkovoy, N. G. Eliseeva. M., 2013.
15. Tsirina M. A., Vlasova N. V., Muratova O. V. Problemy unifikatsii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v sovremennom mire. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 4.
