Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Tula, Russian Federation
The work is devoted to the development of methodological approaches to the choice of ways to increase labor productivity through ergonomic support during complex production preparation. Separate measures for the organization of labor at the enterprise with possible improvement of labor rationing, assessment and training of personnel, the choice of directions for automation of individual operations are considered. The characteristics of performers (operators) to be evaluated during professional selection and their use in modeling the processes of interaction of operators with the control object under certain conditions of the production environment, requirements for the quality of operations performed are analyzed. The subjective and physical environment reduces or increases the quality indicators of the operator's activity and their accounting together with the individual characteristics of the operators requires a methodology based on a systematic analysis of all factors affecting labor productivity. The results of mathematical modeling based on experimental data, taking into account the complex nature of factors operating in the production system, are presented.
labor productivity, ergonomic support, professionally important qualities of operators, environmental factors, workplace, system analysis, modeling of interaction in an ergatic system, labor rationing, professional selection, operator fatigue, automation of operations
1. Pereverzev M.P., Logvinov S.I., Logvinov S.S. Organizaciya proizvodstva na promyshlennyh predpriyatiyah. M.: INFRA-M, 2006. 331 s
2. Ivahnenko A.G., Stepashko V.S. Pomehoustoychivost' modelirovaniya. Kiev: «Naukova dumka», 1985. 216 s
3. Shibanov G.P. Kolichestvennaya ocenka deyatel'nosti cheloveka v sistemah chelovek-tehnika. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1983. 263 s.
4. Logvinov S.I., Logvinov S.S. Problemy ocenki effektivnosti rabochih sistem s uchetom ergaticheskogo elementa Nauchnaya konferenciya nauchno-pedagogicheskih rabotnikov, aspirantov, magistrantov TGPU im. L.N. Tolstogo «Universitet XXI veka: nauchnoe izmerenie». 14-29 iyunya 2018 g. S. 288-291
5. Logvinov S.I., Savina I.V. Kompleksnyy analiz formirovaniya professional'nyh kachestv chelovecheskogo kapitala // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2012.№ 2-1. S. 311-316.
6. Metodologiya issledovaniy po inzhenernoy psihologii i psihologii truda. Ch. 2 / Pod red. A.A. Krylova. L.: LGU, 1976. 160s.
7. Dmitrieva M.A., Krylov A.A., Naftul'ev A.I. Psihologiya truda i inzhenernaya psihologiya. / Pod red. A.A. Krylova. L.: LGU, 1979. 224 s
8. Eliseev O.P. Praktikum po psihologii lichnosti. izd. SPb.: Piter, 2002. 512 s.
9. Golikov Yu.Ya. Koncepcii adaptivnoy avtomatizacii i podhody k cheloveku i tehnike dlya sovremennyh cheloveko-mashinnyh kompleksov. /Yu.Ya. Golikov // Psihologiya adaptacii i social'naya sreda: sovremennye podhody, problemy perspektivy. 2007. S. 392-408.
10. Logvinov S.I., Logvinov S.S., Lapin A.V., Pokrovskiy Yu.Yu. Ocenka nadezhnosti ergaticheskogo elementa v slozhnoy sisteme, funkcioniruyuschey v ekstremal'nyh usloviyah // Izvestiya Tul GU. Tehnicheskie nauki. Vyp. 1. Ch. 2. Tula: Izd-vo TulGU, 2011. S. 244-251
11. Zarakovskiy G.M. Psihofiziologicheskiy analiz trudovoy deyatel'nosti. M.: Nauka, 1966. 114 s.
12. Suhodol'skiy G.V. Strukturno-algoritmicheskiy analiz i sintez deyatel'nosti. L.: LGU, 1976. 120 s.
