from 01.01.1992 to 01.01.2025
Glazov, Izhevsk, Russian Federation
The article discusses the actual problem of assessing the didactic complexity of sufficiently large educational texts on the example of topics and sections of a school physics course. To determine the complexity of the text, the expert must: 1) divide the text into fragments of 3–4 pages; 2) for each fragment, write out 10 key terms in a file, knowledge of which is necessary for understanding the text; 2) collect key concepts in one file Slovar.txt and evaluate the complexity of each term; 3) using a special program Slozhnost.pas, accessing the file Slovar.txt, analyze files with keywords and calculate their average information capacity; 4) for each topic, estimate the proportion of mathematical and other formulas relative to the total volume; 5) write out the key terms present in mathematical formulas from each topic in a special file and evaluate their complexity; 7) using the Slozhnost.pas program, determine the total amount of information in the key terms included in the formulas, as well as the information folding coefficient; 8) find the average number of words in sentences, the average word length, and calculate the structural complexity of the text; 9) calculate differential and integral didactic complexity for each topic. The results of the analysis are presented in a table and histograms characterizing the didactic complexity of various sections and topics of the school physics course.
didactics, information, content analysis, physics methodology, complexity, textbook
1. Batura T.V. Matematicheskaya lingvistika i avtomaticheskaya obrabotka tekstov: ucheb. posobie. Novosibirsk: RIC NGU, 2016. 166 s.
2. Velichkovskiy B.M. Kognitivnaya nauka: Osnovy psihologii poznaniya: v 2 t. T. 1. - M.: Smysl: Izdatel'skiy centr «Akademiya», 2006. 448 s.
3. Gel'fman E.G., Holodnaya M.A. Psihodidaktika shkol'nogo uchebnika. Intellektual'noe vospitanie uchaschihsya. - SPb.: Piter, 2006. 384 s.
4. Zerkal' O.V. Semanticheskaya informaciya i podhody k ee ocenke. Chast' 1. Semantiko-pragmaticheskaya informaciya i logiko-semanticheskaya koncepciya // Filosofiya nauki. 2014. № 1. C. 53-69.
5. Krioni N.K. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema analiza slozhnosti uchebnyh tekstov / N.K. Krioni, A.D. Nikin, A.V. Filippova // Vestnik UGATU (Ufa). - 2008. T. 11. № 1 (28). - S. 101-107.
6. Kuznecov I.P. Mehanizmy obrabotki semanticheskoy informacii. - M.: Nauka, 1978. 174 s.
7. Lukov Val.A., Lukov Vl.A. Metodologiya tezaurusnogo podhoda: strategiya ponimaniya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2014. № 1. S. 18-35.
8. Marchuk Yu.N. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika: ucheb. posobie. - M.: AST: Vostok-Zapad, 2007. 317 s.
9. Mayer R.V. Metod ocenki didakticheskoy slozhnosti shkol'nyh uchebnikov po razlichnym disciplinam // Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii. № 5. 2020. S. 14-19.
10. Mayer R.V. Ocenka didakticheskoy slozhnosti razdelov kursa obschey fiziki // NIR. Social'no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya i tehnologii. № 1(34), 2021. S. 4248.
11. Mikk Ya.A. Optimizaciya slozhnosti uchebnogo teksta: V pomosch' avtoram i redaktoram. - M.: Prosveschenie, 1981. 119 s.
12. Myakishev G.Ya. i dr. Fizika: ucheb. dlya 10-h klassov obscheobrazovat. uchrezhdeniy: bazovyy i profil. urovni / G.Ya. Myakishev, B.B. Buhovcev, N.N. Sotskiy. - M.: Prosveschenie, 2004. 336 s.
13. Myakishev G.Ya., Buhovcev B.B. Fizika: ucheb. dlya 11-h klassov obscheobrazovat. uchrezhdeniy. - M.: Prosveschenie, 2003. - 336 s.
14. Nevdah M.M. Issledovanie informacionnyh harakteristik uchebnogo teksta metodami mnogomernogo statisticheskogo analiza // Prikladnaya informatika. 2008. № 4. S. 117-130.
15. Oborneva I.V. Avtomatizirovannaya ocenka slozhnosti uchebnyh tekstov na osnove statisticheskih parametrov: dis. … kand ped nauk. M., 2006. 165 s.
16. Samsonov N.B. i dr. Razrabotka i aprobaciya lingvisticheskoy metodiki ocenki kognitivnoy slozhnosti nauchno-uchebnogo teksta / N.B. Samsonov, E.V. Chmyhova, D.G. Davydov // Psihologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. T. 8. № 41. S. 6.
17. Chernyahovskaya L.A. Smyslovaya struktura teksta i ee edinicy // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1983. № 6. S. 117-126.
18. Shalak V.I. Sovremennyy kontent-analiz. Prilozheniya v oblasti: po-litologii, psihologii, sociologii, kul'turologii, ekonomiki, reklamy. - M.: Omega-L, 2004. 272 s.
19. White M. D., Marsh E. E. Content analysis: A flexible methodology // Library trends, Vol. 55, № 1, 2006. - pp. 22-45.
