THE PRINCIPLE OF HUMANISM AS A MEANS OF ENSURING THE PROHIBITION OF TORTURE
Authors:
1.
The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
(department of foreign constitutional, administrative, criminal legislation and international law, senior researcher of the department of foreign constitutional, administrative, criminal legislation and international law)
employee
Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 1
to 1
Status:
Published
Received:
16.03.2022
Accepted:
17.03.2022
Published:
17.03.2022
Subject area:
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
jus cogens, zapret pytok, dostoinstvo cheloveka, neprikosnovennost' lichnosti, princip gumanizma, princip nevydvoreniya, zhertva pytok, zloupotrebleniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve, nacional'nyy preventivnyy mehanizm
Abstract (English):
Avtorom predstavlen sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz podhodov gosudarstv — uchastnikov SNG k kriminalizacii pytok. Predlagaetsya rassmatrivat' etu problemu skvoz' prizmu sleduyuschih aktual'nyh voprosov: 1) rassmotrenie zapreta pytok kak «absolyutnogo prava» cheloveka (jus cogens); 2) analiz nezyblemyh konstitucionnyh prav cheloveka; 3) obraschenie k reglamentacii principa gumanizma v ugolovnyh zakonah; 4) tezis o transversal'nom haraktere instituta zapreta, predotvrascheniya, ugolovnogo presledovaniya i sudebnogo rassledovaniya pytok. V stat'e raskryty interesnye dlya otechestvennoy nauki i praktiki napravleniya predotvrascheniya i rassledovaniya pytok v ugolovnom i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom zakonodatel'stve gosudarstv — uchastnikov SNG. V chastnosti, ukazyvayutsya modeli presecheniya zloupotrebleniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (v zakonodatel'stve Kazahstana i Kyrgyzstana) i zaschity zhertv pytok (v yurisdikcii Moldovy), privodyatsya podhody k vvedeniyu nacional'nogo preventivnogo mehanizma (na primere Azerbaydzhana, Armenii, Kazahstana i Kyrgyzstana).
Avtorom predstavlen sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz podhodov gosudarstv — uchastnikov SNG k kriminalizacii pytok. Predlagaetsya rassmatrivat' etu problemu skvoz' prizmu sleduyuschih aktual'nyh voprosov: 1) rassmotrenie zapreta pytok kak «absolyutnogo prava» cheloveka (jus cogens); 2) analiz nezyblemyh konstitucionnyh prav cheloveka; 3) obraschenie k reglamentacii principa gumanizma v ugolovnyh zakonah; 4) tezis o transversal'nom haraktere instituta zapreta, predotvrascheniya, ugolovnogo presledovaniya i sudebnogo rassledovaniya pytok. V stat'e raskryty interesnye dlya otechestvennoy nauki i praktiki napravleniya predotvrascheniya i rassledovaniya pytok v ugolovnom i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom zakonodatel'stve gosudarstv — uchastnikov SNG. V chastnosti, ukazyvayutsya modeli presecheniya zloupotrebleniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (v zakonodatel'stve Kazahstana i Kyrgyzstana) i zaschity zhertv pytok (v yurisdikcii Moldovy), privodyatsya podhody k vvedeniyu nacional'nogo preventivnogo mehanizma (na primere Azerbaydzhana, Armenii, Kazahstana i Kyrgyzstana).
Keywords:
jus cogens, zapret pytok, dostoinstvo cheloveka, neprikosnovennost' lichnosti, princip gumanizma, princip nevydvoreniya, zhertva pytok, zloupotrebleniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve, nacional'nyy preventivnyy mehanizm
jus cogens, zapret pytok, dostoinstvo cheloveka, neprikosnovennost' lichnosti, princip gumanizma, princip nevydvoreniya, zhertva pytok, zloupotrebleniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve, nacional'nyy preventivnyy mehanizm
No data
1. No data
