ON THE PROPOSAL FOR REFORMING OF THE GLOBAL JUSTICE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION THROUGH “RADICAL AUTONOMATION”
Authors:
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 0
to 0
Status:
Published
Received:
18.02.2015
Accepted:
18.02.2015
Published:
18.02.2015
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
Global justice (justices of the peace), autonomation, judicial remedy of rights and freedoms, judicial reform.
Abstract (English):
The author proves the inadmissibility of the transformation of the global justice through its “autonomation” (separation from federal justice and locking-in at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation) suggested in the article of M. I. Kleandrov “On the Model of the Global Justice Radical Autonomation in the Russian Federation” (Journal of Russian Law. 2015. No. 3. P. 31—42), as well as groundlessness of the statement on deprivation of the right to judicial protection for more than 30 million Russia’s citizens, who carry out entrepreneurial activities as unregistered entrepreneurs. The author defends the suggestion on the transfer of civil cases involving individual entrepreneurs from arbitration courts to general jurisdiction courts with the purpose of providing individual entrepreneurs with the access to justice. The author justifies the necessity to preserve currently existing procedural and organizational contacts between justices of the peace who are judges of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and federal courts (district, regional, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation).
The author proves the inadmissibility of the transformation of the global justice through its “autonomation” (separation from federal justice and locking-in at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation) suggested in the article of M. I. Kleandrov “On the Model of the Global Justice Radical Autonomation in the Russian Federation” (Journal of Russian Law. 2015. No. 3. P. 31—42), as well as groundlessness of the statement on deprivation of the right to judicial protection for more than 30 million Russia’s citizens, who carry out entrepreneurial activities as unregistered entrepreneurs. The author defends the suggestion on the transfer of civil cases involving individual entrepreneurs from arbitration courts to general jurisdiction courts with the purpose of providing individual entrepreneurs with the access to justice. The author justifies the necessity to preserve currently existing procedural and organizational contacts between justices of the peace who are judges of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and federal courts (district, regional, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation).
Keywords:
Global justice (justices of the peace), autonomation, judicial remedy of rights and freedoms, judicial reform.
Global justice (justices of the peace), autonomation, judicial remedy of rights and freedoms, judicial reform.
1. Borisova E. A. Optimizatsiya ustroystva sudebnykh instantsiy v svete reorganizatsii sudebnoy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Zakon. 2014. № 4.
2. Velikaya reforma: k 150-letiyu Sudebnykh ustavov: v 2 t. / pod red. E. A. Borisovoy, L. V. Golovko. M., 2014.
3. Kleandrov M. I. O modeli radikal´noy avtonomizatsii mirovoy yustitsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 3.
