Theoretical and Empirical Aspect of the Article. Socioeconomic transformation and crisis phenomena in the Russian economy in recent years have, led to the transformation of the social and labour sphere, which was the least adapted to the new realities of economic life. In its turn, the qualitative and quantitative state of the labour force determines the efficiency of the processes of economic growth. Consequently, there remains the relevance of monitoring the factors that characterize the influence of the main enterprise in the social and labour spheres of the monoterritory. The desire to reduce the main enterprise labour costs and reduce expenditures on the social infrastructure of the monotown has a painful impact on the local labour market and the economically active population. Implications of the negative impact on well-being is characterized by a decrease in the labour force, which necessitates scoring and researching the problems of social pollution from economic activities of businesses. Solving problems of lowering levels of social polluting the social and labour sphere of economic activity of the monoterritory by the main enterprise is severely limited by the lack of evidence-based information and methodological support of monitoring, analysis and evaluation of the factors and processes of social pollution. Thus, the relevance of this study is related to the urgent need to researching the phenomenon of social pollution from economic activities of economic development of enterprises and elaborating the methods of controlling it.
social and labour sphere of the monoterritory, social pollution, toxic management practices, prekarity, the health manpower company.
1. Концепция социального загрязнения
Концепция социального загрязнения, сформулированная Дж. Пфеффером в 2010 г., подразумевает, что организации и их руководители могут использовать практики управления, которые наносят вред качеству жизни и благосостояния работников [1]. Мы идентифицируем социальное загрязнение от экономической деятельности хозяйствующих субъектов [Гундаров, 2013, с. 53–61] как нанесение ущерба благосостоянию и причинение вреда физическому и социально-психологическому благополучию трудовых ресурсов в результате внутренней и внешней экономической деятельности организаций [Бобков, 2013, с. 3–11] и выделяем четыре группы факторов социального загрязнения (рис.1).
Менеджмент предприятий мало обращает внимания на то, как деятельность отражается на человеке и социальной среде организации [Баженов, 2013, с. 85–89]. Стратегия минимизации затрат на рабочую силу использует токсические практики управления человеческими ресурсами, среди которых прекаризация занятости [2–3] и флексибилизация персонала [4–5] деструктивно воздействуют на работников [Манахова, 2013, с. 61–66].
1. Pfeffer J. Building sustainable organizations: the human factor. Research Paper No. 2017. Graduate School of Business Stanford University Stanford, California, 2009.
2. Bobkov V. N. 20 let kapitalisticheskikh transformatsiy v Rossii: vliyanie na uroven´ i kachestvo zhizni [20 years of capitalist transformation in Russia: the impact on the level and quality of life]. Narodnyy sobor [People’s Cathedral]. Available at: http://mosnarodsobor.ru/?page=news&;id=1657, 21.05.2012.
3. Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V. Sotsial’naya uyazvimost’ rabotnikov i obshchestva kak rezul’tat neustoychivosti zanyatosti [social vulnerability of workers and the public as a result of the instability of employment]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Vserossiyskiy tsentr urovnya zhizni naseleniya [Official site of the National Center for life]. Available at: http://www.vcug.ru/.
4. Fedorova A.E., Parsyukevich A.M. Prekarizatsiya zanyatosti i ee vliyanie na sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe blagopoluchie naemnykh rabotnikov [Prekarizatsiya employment and its impact on the socio-economic well-being of employees]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Ural State University]. 2013, I. 5 (49), pp. 76-81.
5. Fedorova A.E., Parsyukevich A.M. Faktory sotsial’nogo zagryazneniya vnutriorganizatsionnoy sredy [Factors social environment pollution the intra]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Omsk University]. 2013, I. 4, pp. 78-82.
6. Standing G. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic. 2011.
7. Gundarov I.A. Poisk optimal’noy modeli sotsial’nogo gosudarstva dlya vysokogo kachestva zhizni naseleniya [Search for the optimal model of the welfare state to a high quality of life]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 3 (181), pp. 53-61.
8. Bashmakov V.I. Sotsiologicheskie aspekty razvitiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala organizatsii [Sociological aspects of human development organization]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 11 (189), pp. 107-113.
9. Guslyakova L.G., Govorukhina G.V., Grigor’ev S.I. Vitalistskaya model’ sotsial’noy raboty kak osnova obespecheniya kachestva zhizni naseleniya [Vitalist model of social work as a basis for ensuring quality of life]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 3 (181), pp. 76-80.
10. Bazhenov A.V. Analiz i otsenka praktiki proizvodstvennykh kompaniy po provedeniyu effektivnoy sotsial’noy politiki [Analysis and evaluation of practices of production companies to carry out effective social policy]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 3 (181), pp. 85-89.
11. Bobkov V.N. Ot kapitalizma k novomu sotsial’nomu kachestvu - narodnomu gumanisticheskomu sotsializmu global’nogo obshchestva [From capitalism to a new social quality - the national humanistic socialism global society]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 3 (181), pp. 18-36.
12. Koldin Yu.V. Protivodeystvie obestseneniyu nakoplennogo blagosostoyaniya v epokhu uchashcheniya krizisov: teoreticheskaya sostavlyayushchaya antikrizisnoy politiki [Countering impairment, the cumulative wealth in the era of more frequent crises: the theoretical component of the anti-crisis policy]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 7 (185), pp. 149-160.
13. Kuklin A.A., Leont’eva A.G., Nikulina N.L. Sotsial’naya zashchita naseleniya kak faktor rosta prodolzhitel’nostizhizni [Social protection of the population as a growth factor in life expectancy]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 1 (179), pp. 130-140.
14. Manakhova I.V. Novaya paradigma izmereniya blagosostoyaniya: Rossiya i strany OESR [The new paradigm of measuring well-being: Russia and the countries of the OECD]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 12 (190), pp. 61-66.
15. Dmitriev M.E., Misikhina V.G. Izmeneniya v urovne dokhodov, potrebleniya, bednosti i v sotsial’nykh zaprosakh rossiyskogo naseleniya v techenie 2000-2012 godov [Changes in the level of income, consumption, poverty and social needs of the Russian population during 2000-2012 years]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 12 (190), pp. 11-27.
16. Bobkov V.N. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya Tsentral’nogo federal’nogo okruga: sostoyanie, dinamika, otsenka. (Prezentatsiya doklada na 1V Mezhdunarodnom forume «Innovatsii. Biznes. Obrazovanie» g. Yaroslavl’. 21-22 noyabrya 2013 g.) [The standard of living of the population of the Central Federal District: state, dynamics, assessment. (Presentation of the report on the 1V International Forum “Innovation. Business. Education» Yaroslavl. 21-22 November 2013)]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 11 (189), pp. 3-11.
17. Bobkov V.N. Metodologicheskie podkhody k razrabotke sistemy sotsial’noy standartizatsii i opyt ee realizatsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Methodological approaches to the development of the social experience of standardization and its implementation in the Russian Federation]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 4 (182), pp. 3-6.
18. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A. Monitoring dokhodov i urovnya zhizni naseleniya: yanvar’-mart 2013 [Monitoring of income and living standards of the population in January-March 2013]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 4 (182), pp. 35-62.
19. Krylova E.B., Simakina M.A. Analiz sushchestvuyushchikh podkhodov k izmereniyu kachestva zhizni cheloveka [Analysis of the existing approaches to measuring quality of life]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 2 (180), pp. 62-67.
20. Moshkov A.V. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya kak vazhneyshaya sostavlyayushchaya strategii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya goroda (na primere Vladivostoka) [The standard of living of the population as a major component of socioeconomic development of the city (for example, Vladivostok)]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 1 (179), pp. 54-60.
