employee
BISAC TEC020000 Manufacturing
Taking into account specific entrepreneurial risks, recommendations are given on the formation of the infrastructure of risky investment at the meso-level and the development of investment programs, strategies of territories within the framework of financial and economic assistance to the development of entrepreneurship in the oil and gas complex. Within the limits of the rights, powers and responsibilities granted by the legislation to local governments in the field of socio-economic development of subordinate territories, the characteristics of the means of financial and economic assistance to the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the oil and gas complex are given. From the point of view of supporting the development of entrepreneurship in the oil and gas complex, investment strategies of the territories should be based on both basic economic factors and specialized programs in relation to direct real, strategic and portfolio investors. At the same time, the systematic, integrated use of the cause-and-effect relationships described in this work should contribute to the development of the domestic oil and gas complex in modern conditions.
industrial entrepreneurship, oil and gas complex, financial and economic instrument, investments, governmental support, financing
1. Vasil'eva Yu.P., Peskova D.R. Rol' toplivno-energeticheskogo sektora v razvitii nacional'noy ekonomiki // Neftegazovoe delo. 2017. № 2. S. 209-215.
2. Pulyaev N.N., Hudashova A.I. Rossiyskiy rynok smazochnyh materialov v usloviyah importozamescheniya // Nauka bez granic. 2016. № 5 (5). S. 36-42.
3. Mihaylenko D.A., Mosakova E.A. Opyt privatizacii gosudarstvennoy sobstvennosti v Kitae i Velikobritanii: uroki dlya Rossii // Konkurentosposobnost' v global'nom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tehnologii. 2018. № 1 (60). S. 220-224.
4. Trofimova N.N. Neobhodimost' stimulirovaniya innovacionnoy aktivnosti predpriyatiy dlya razvitiya naukoemkih proizvodstv // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i upravleniya. 2016. № 4 (12). S. 98-101.
5. Kulagina N.A., Rahmeeva I.I., Lysenko A.N. Institucional'noe upravlenie tehnologicheskim buduschim staropromyshlennogo regiona // Srednerusskiy vestnik obschestvennyh nauk. 2020. T. 15. № 3. S. 82-97.
6. Klimova N.I., Krasnoselskaya D.K., Khamzina D.R. An empirical study on the relationships between sales revenue of oil company (Rosneft) and industry specific and exogenous characteristics // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2018. T. 13. № 8 (62). S. 2261-2268.
7. Basiev T.A., Sanakoeva D.K. Sovremennye nalogovye l'goty i preferencii dlya malogo i srednego biznesa // Modern Science. 2020. № 2-1. S. 41-46.
8. Golovchenko A.V., Dmitriev N.D. Management of enterprise investment policy // Modern Science. 2019. № 5-4. S. 49-52.
9. Dmitriev N.D. Sovremennye formy gosudarstvennoy podderzhki malogo biznesa v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2019. № 2. S. 19-24.
10. Martyshenko N.S. Novye vozmozhnosti razvitiya predprinimatel'skoy sredy v svyazi s vvodom integrirovannoy razvlekatel'noy zony «Primor'e» // Prakticheskiy marketing. 2016. № 5 (231). S. 17-24.
11. Grishin K.E., Timir'yanova V.M., Krasnosel'skaya D.H. i dr. Issledovanie vliyaniya konteksta na deyatel'nost' predpriyatiy metodami ierarhicheskogo analiza // Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. 2019. № 5 (149). S. 75-81.
12. Naminova K.A., Omadykova K.S. Finansovaya podderzhka malogo i sred-nego biznesa Rossii // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2017. № 6 (83). S. 432-435.
13. Fattahov R.V., Nizamutdinov M.M., Oreshnikov V.V. Instrumentariy obosnovaniya parametrov strategicheskogo razvitiya regiona na baze adaptivno-imitacionnogo modelirovaniya // Region: Ekonomika i Sociologiya. 2017. № 1 (93). S. 101-120.
14. Polyakova A.G., Simarova I.S. Realizaciya gosudarstvennoy politiki v rossiyskom gazovom komplekse v usloviyah krizisa // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2015. № 19. S. 44-46.
15. Il'in I.V., Rostova O.V., Koposov V.I. Modelirovanie i algoritmizaciya neytral'nyh k rynochnomu risku strategiy // Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2013. № 1 (87). S. 90-95.
16. Yakupov B.T. Indeks investicionnoy privlekatel'nosti kompaniy neftegazovogo sektora Rossii // Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan. 2018. № 3. S. 83-91.
17. Topoleva T.N. Formirovanie gosudarstvennoy politiki upravleniya promyshlennymi klasterami // Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya i razrabotki. 2018. № 3. S. 49-53.
18. Avdeev Yu.M., Mokrecov Yu.V., Tesalovskiy A.A. Povyshenie konkurentosposobnosti otrasli kak faktor investicionnoy privlekatel'nosti regiona // Innovacionnoe razvitie ekonomiki. 2018. № 2 (44). S. 19-32.
