On the basis of a variety of literature on educational, social, psychological sciences, the conditions for the qualitative life of the educational process are determined, including, first of all, the problems of the formation of morality, responsibility and initiative of the student, as well as his mental and physical health. The true end result is the fact of the fundamental impossibility of replacing full-time or personal education with its detached, irresponsible distance form. The transformation of the educational environment through personalities from each other leads not only to the depletion of opportunities to acquire quality knowledge, but also to intimate loneliness with disastrous consequences for moral, mental and physical health.
distance education, care, morality, responsibility, trust, health
1. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135.
2. Cinquin, P. A., Guitton, P., & Sauzéon, H. (2019). Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 130, 152-167.
3. Maslow, A. H. (1966). The psychology of science a reconnaissance.
4. Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. M. (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization.
5. Cheng, X., Fu, S., & de Vreede, G. J. (2017). Understanding trust influencing factors in social media communication: A qualitative study. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 25-35.
6. Henderson, L. S., Stackman, R. W., & Lindekilde, R. (2016). The centrality of communication norm alignment, role clarity, and trust in global project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1717-1730.
7. Haynes, F. (2018). Trust and the community of inquiry. Educational Philosophy and theory, 50(2), 144-151.
8. Moe, N. B., & Šmite, D. (2008). Understanding a lack of trust in Global Software Teams: a multiple-case study. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 13(3), 217-231.
9. Grafton, S. T. (2009). Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 97-117.
10. Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
11. Koziol, L. F., Budding, D. E., & Chidekel, D. (2012). From movement to thought: executive function, embodied cognition, and the cerebellum. The Cerebellum, 11(2), 505-525.
12. Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(1), 1-30.
13. Winkielman, P., Coulson, S., & Niedenthal, P. (2018). Dynamic grounding of emotion concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170127.
14. Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354-364.
15. Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PloS one, 8(8), e71182.
16. Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 260-284.
17. Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2019). Handshaking promotes deal-making by signaling cooperative intent.Journal of personality and social psychology, 116(5), 743.
18. Metiu, A., & Rothbard, N. P. (2013). Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organization Science, 24(2), 455-475.
19. Collins, R. (2014). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton university press.
20. Krueger, J. (2013). Merleau-Ponty on shared emotions and the joint ownership thesis. Continental Philosophy Review, 46(4), 509-531.
21. Rhee, S. Y. (2006, August). SHARED EMOTIONS AND GROUP EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF BROADENING-AND-BUILDING INTERACTIONS. In Academy of management Proceedings (Vol. 2006, No. 1, pp. B1-B6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
22. Salmela, M., & Nagatsu, M. (2017). How does it really feel to act together? Shared emotions and the phenomenology of we-agency.Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 449-470.
23. Mejía-Arauz, R., Rogoff, B., Dayton, A., & Henne-Ochoa, R. (2018). Collaboration or negotiation: Two ways of interacting suggest how shared thinking develops. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 117-123.
24. Paradise, R., & Rogoff, B. (2009). Side by side: Learning by observing and pitching in. Ethos, 37(1), 102-138.
25. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chávez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation.Annual review of psychology, 54.
26. Paradise, R., Mejía-Arauz, R., Silva, K. G., Dexter, A. L., & Rogoff, B. (2014). One, two, three, eyes on me! Adults attempting control versus guiding in support of initiative. Human Development, 57(2-3), 131-149.
27. Teo, T. S., Kim, S. L., & Jiang, L. (2020). E-learning implementation in south Korea: Integrating Effectiveness and Legitimacy Perspectives. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 511-528.
28. Gerasimova, V. G., Melamud, M. R., Tutaeva, D. R., Romanova, Y. D., & Zhenova, N. A. (2018). The adoption of e-learning technology at the faculty of distance learning of plekhanov russian university of economics. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 172-188.
29. Guo, P. J., White, J., & Zanelatto, R. (2015, October). Codechella: Multi-user program visualizations for real-time tutoring and collaborative learning. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 79-87). IEEE.
30. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment,49(1), 71-75.
31. Hawkley, L. C., & Capitanio, J. P. (2015). Perceived social isolation, evolutionary fitness and health outcomes: a lifespan approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1669), 20140114.
32. Hawkley, L. C., Cole, S. W., Capitanio, J. P., Norman, G. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Effects of social isolation on glucocorticoid regulation in social mammals. Hormones and behavior, 62(3), 314-323.
33. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms.Annals of behavioral medicine, 40(2), 218-227.
34. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science,302(5643), 290-292.
35. Bedard, M., Woods, R., Crump, C., & Anisman, H. (2017). Loneliness in relation to depression: The moderating influence of a polymorphism of the brain derived neurotrophic factor gene on self-efficacy and coping strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1224.
36. Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, L., Ge, T., Chong, M., Ferguson, M. A., Misic, B., Burrow, A. L., ... & Spreng, R. N. (2019). Loneliness and meaning in life are reflected in the intrinsic network architecture of the brain. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 14(4), 423-433.
37. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2), 227-237.
38. Rico-Uribe, L. A., Caballero, F. F., Martín-María, N., Cabello, M., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., & Miret, M. (2018). Association of loneliness with all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis. PloS one, 13(1), e0190033.
39. Churchland, P. S. (2018). Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton University Press.
40. Grassian, S. (1983). Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140(11), 1450-1454.
41. Kim, S. G., Park, J., Kim, H. T., Pan, Z., Lee, Y., & McIntyre, R. S. (2019). The relationship between smartphone addiction and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity in South Korean adolescents. Annals of general psychiatry, 18(1), 1.
42. Mengin, A., Allé, M. C., Rolling, J., Ligier, F., Schroder, C., Lalanne, L., ... & Brunault, P. (2020). Psychopathological consequences of confinement. L'Encephale.
43. Bennion, E. (2015). Banning the bing: Why extreme solitary confinement is cruel and far too usual punishment. Ind. LJ, 90, 741.
44. Coppola, F. (2019). The brain in solitude: an (other) eighth amendment challenge to solitary confinement. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(1), 184-225.
45. Smith, P. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and justice, 34(1), 441-528.
46. Guenther, L. (2013). Solitary confinement: Social death and its afterlives. U of Minnesota Press.
