Russian Federation
In economic science, the importance of researching technological entrepreneurship, its contribution to the economic development of the territory, is increasing. According to the statistics of the international indexed databases Scopus and WOS, the publication activity of researchers studying the issues of technology entrepreneurship in the economic direction increased by 111.5% and 122%, respectively. Thus, the issue of studying the specifics of the development of technological entrepreneurship is relevant. At the same time, the study of the experience of foreign countries, where significant attention is paid to the development of technological entrepreneurship, both at the state level and in the commercial sector, is of particular importance for domestic practice. The purpose of the study is to prove, based on the study of foreign experience, the prospects for the development of technological entrepreneurship as a tool for accelerated economic growth and a way to attract investment for the development of a territory. The article examines foreign experience in the development of technological entrepreneurship. The analysis of foreign cases of technological entrepreneurship development is presented. On the basis of the analysis, the directions of technological entrepreneurship in foreign countries are systematized. Successful cases of technological entrepreneurship have been researched and systematized. The main characteristics of technology entrepreneurship abroad are identified based on the consideration of specific practical cases, which is especially important from the point of view of evidence of the effectiveness of this tool in managing the development of technological entrepreneurship. The research materials will be useful for scientists and specialists to study the experience of foreign and cases on technological entrepreneurship, and can also be used by government and administrative bodies at the federal and regional levels in the development of target-oriented documents in the field of SME development and management of socio-economic development in general.
technological entrepreneurship, foreign experience, economics, investments, specificity, development, territories
1. Kordel' P. Tehnologicheskoe predprinimatel'stvo kak mehanizm strategicheskogo razvitiya organizacii // Nauchnye trudy Vroclavskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2014. № 356. S. 19-28.
2. Nord D. Instituty i ekonomicheskiy rost: istoricheskoe vvedenie // THESIS. 1993. T. 1. Vyp. 2. S. 69-91.
3. Yakushev N.O. Tehnologicheskoe predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii: problemy ocenki // Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya. 2020. T. 8. № 3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2020.3.53.3 URL: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/28589
4. Gulin K.A., Yakushev N.O., Mazilov E.A. Aktivizaciya ekonomicheskogo rosta v regionah RF na osnove stimulirovaniya razvitiya nesyr'evogo eksporta // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2018. T. 11. № 3. S. 57-70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2018.3.57.4
5. Yakushev N.O. Rol' tehnologicheskogo predprinimatel'stva v razvitii regiona // Strategii biznesa. 2020. № 8(8). S. 201-205. https://doi.org/10.17747/2311-7184-2020-8-201-205
6. Terjesen S., Hessels J. Varieties of export-oriented entrepreneurship in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 537-561.
7. Ferreira J.J. [et al.]. What do we not know about technology entrepreneurship research?. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2016, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 713-733.
8. Choi J.I., Byun Y.J. The Exploratory Study on Development of Interdisciplinary Technology Entrepreneurship Education Model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2013, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 119-128.
9. Prashantham S., Eranova M., Couper C. Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2018, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-9.
10. Shih T., Huang Y.Y. A case study on technology entrepreneurship education at a Taiwanese research university. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2017, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 202-211.
11. Parameswar N. [et al.]. Factors that drive development of technological entrepreneurship in South Asia. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 2019, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 429-448.
12. Trott P. [et al.]. Managing technology entrepreneurship and innovation. Routledge, London, 2015. 258 p.
13. He C., Lu J., Qian H. Entrepreneurship in China. Small Business Economics, 2019, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 563-572.
14. Yolas S. An empirical study regarding entrepreneurship in Europe and central Asia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 195, pp. 1097-1103.
15. Su Y.S., Chen J. Introduction to regional innovation systems in East Asia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, vol. 100, rr. 80-82.
16. Audretsch D., Caiazza R. Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1247-1259.
17. Lee J.A., Ahn Y.S. Developing measurement tool of entrepreneurship for young entrepreneurs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2018, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 197-209.
18. Sethi A. From science to startup: the inside track of technology entrepreneurship. Springer, Berlin, 2016. 243 r.
19. Alam Y.P., Purwanti Y., Palls A. Strengthening entrepreneurship in the Asian community. International Conference of One Asia Community, 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 141-143.
20. Gil W., Sim Y., Kim S. Study of Startup Policy of Government Research Institute through Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of ETRI Pre-Startup Support Program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2016, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 45-56.
21. Danalache F. [et al.]. Entrepreneurship and its relationship with technology innovation and HRM. International Conference on Management and Industrial Engineering. Niculescu Publishing House, 2015, no. 7, pp. 604-611.
22. Holmes Jr R. M. [et al.]. Two-way streets: The role of institutions and technology policy in firms’ corporate entrepreneurship and political strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2016, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 247-272.
23. Ahlstrom D. [et al.]. A global perspective of entrepreneurship and innovation in China. Multinational Business Review, 2018, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 302- 318. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-08-2018-0058
24. Rippa P., Secundo G. Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 146, pp. 900-911.
25. Ahn T.U., Kang T.W. A Study on Difficulty Factors of Youth Startups for Activating Local Startups. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 67-80.
26. Ajagbe A.M. [et al.]. Financing Early Staged Technology Based Firms in Malaysia. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2015, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 210-221.
27. Xie K. [et al.]. Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, vol. 135, pp. 156-168.
28. Leung W.F., Cossu A. Digital entrepreneurship in Taiwan and Thailand: Embracing precarity as a personal response to political and economic change. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2019, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 264-280.
29. Latif Z. Challenges and prospects of ICT and trade development in Asia. Human Systems Management, 2017, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 211-219.
30. Wadid L. [et al.]. Technology entrepreneurship and business incubation: Theory, practice, lessons learned. World Scientific, Singapore, 2016. 312 p.
31. Leyden D. P., Link A. N. Public sector entrepreneurship: US technology and innovation policy. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015. 250 p.
32. Groen A., Cook G., Van Der Sijde P. New technology-based firms in the new millennium. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 2015. 288 p.
33. Stayton J., Mangematin V. Startup time, innovation and organizational emergence: A study of USA-based international technology ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2016, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 373 - 409.
34. Audretsch D., Caiazza R. Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1247-1259.
35. Engel J.S. Global clusters of innovation: Lessons from Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 2015, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 36-65.
36. Wonglimpiyarat J. Exploring strategic venture capital financing with Silicon Valley style. Technological Forecasting and Social Change., 2016, vol. 102, pp. 80-89.
37. Fung K.C. [et al.]. Digital silk road, Silicon Valley and connectivity. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 2018, vol. 16, no 3, pp. 313-336.
38. Etzkowitz H. Is Silicon Valley a global model or unique anomaly?. Industry and Higher Education, 2019, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 83-95.
39. Stephens B. [et al.]. Austin, Boston, Silicon Valley, and New York: Case studies in the location choices of entrepreneurs in maintaining the Technopolis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 146, pp. 267-280.
40. Guzman J., Stern S. Where is silicon valley?. Science, 2015, vol. 347, no. 6222, pp. 606-609.
41. Azoulay P. [et al.]. Age and high-growth entrepreneurship, 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65-82.
42. Levina M., Hasinoff A.A. The Silicon Valley ethos: Tech industry products, discourses, and practices. Television & New Media, 2017, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 489-495.
