doctoral candidate
Discourse is a phenomenon that reflects the unique features of the recipient’s cultural and geopolitical affiliation. The purpose of the study is to reveal and identify the linguistic representation of critical discourse. The language tools used as the evaluative category of journalistic discourse are examined and highlighted. The teaching methods chosen to view the tools targeted at influencing the recipient are described. The relevance of the study is connected with the importance to learn the requirements of the modern discourse construction and the growing interest in the language communication impact on the assessment of the world events. The diversity of political discourse expressions is analyzed. The elements of the discourse comparative study are included, which allows us to trace the principles of discourse design by representatives of different cultures. The methods of discourse teaching aimed at critical thinking development and the proper argumentation choice are emphasized and examined.
discourse-analysis, social interaction, teaching methods, critical discourse, pedagogics
1. Bugaeva O.V. Kognitivnoe napravlenie organizacii diskursa v politicheskoy lingvistike (na materiale issledovaniy posvyaschennyh politicheskoy metafore) // Uchenye zapiski Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo social'nogo universiteta. 2012. №4 (104). S. 109-111.
2. Grobickaya A.M. Diskursivno-semanticheskiy analiz sobytiynogo makro-diskursa (na materiale angloyazychnyh gazetnyh tekstov): dis. … kand. filol. nauk. SPb., 2002.344s.
3. Dzhioeva A. A. Understatement kak otrazhenie anglosaksonskogo mentaliteta // Dzhioeva A.A., Ivanova V.G. Angliyskiy yazyk na gumanitarnyh fakul'tetah. Teoriya i praktika: sb. nauchnyh i metodologicheskih trudov. M., 2009. Vyp. 3. S 5-29.
4. Karasik V.I. Diskursionnye personalii // Yazyk, kommunikaciya i social'naya sreda. Voronezh, 2007. Vyp. 5.S.284-286.
5. Kormilicyna M. A. Zabota ob adresatah - vazhneyshaya funkciya rechevogo etiketa v sovremennoy gazete // Voprosy kul'tury rechi. M., 2011. T. 10.S.353-357.
6. Kubryakova E.S. O ponyatiyah diskursa i diskursivnogo analiza v sovremennoy lingvistike // Diskurs, rech', rechevaya deyatel'nost'. RAN. Institut nauchn. informacii po obschestvennym naukam. Funkcional'nye i strukturnye aspekty. M., 2000. S.5-13.
7. Popova N.V., Iovleva V. I. Predmetno-yazykovoe integrirovannoe obuchenie v vuzovskom uchebnom processe // Innovacionnye idei i podhody k integrirovannomu obucheniyu inostrannym yazykam i professional'nym disciplinam v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya, mat-ly mezhdunar. shkoly-konf. 27-30 marta 2017 g. SPb., 2017. S. 426.
8. Ryabova A. L. Obschestvennoe mnenie i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya // Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti Sankt Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki. 2015. №1 (212). S. 59-67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5862/JHSS.215.8. URL: https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2015.19.8/
9. Uhova L.V. Stereotipnost' i kreativnost' reklamnogo teksta // Stereotipnost' i tvorchestvo v tekste: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. / pod red. M. P. Katyurovoy. Perm. Gos. nac. un-t. Perm', 2012. Vyp. 16. S.163-173.
10. Biber D. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988. pp.1-5.
11. Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa and Coulthard Malcolm (eds). Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 1996.312 p.
12. Gumberz J. and Levinson S. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.500p.
13. Gee James Paul. Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education 171. 1. (1989). pp. 5-176.
14. Marsh D. Language Awareness and CLIL. In: J. Cenoz; N. H. Hornberger (Eds). Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Knowledge about Language, 2nd edition. Volume 6. New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007.
15. Stubbs M. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer Assisted Studies of Language and Culture, Oxford, Blackwell,1996. pp. 305-320.
16. Stubbs M. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford, Blackwell, 1983.288p.
17. The Guardian. Available at: http://archive.guardian.co.uk (Accessed: 02 December 2018).
18. Dijk T.A. van (Ed.). Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Special Issue, Discourse Studies, 8(1), 2006. pp.159-177
19. Chernyavskaya V.E., Molodychenko E.V. Rechevoe vozdeystvie v politicheskom, reklamnom i internet-diskurse. M., 2017. 176 s.
