employee
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
UDK 31 Статистика. Демография. Социология
The development of civic initiatives is a significant indicator of the social and political life of the community. A study of urban space initiatives can reveal both the state of civil society and the resource capabilities of the area. The research objective was to find tools for sociological analysis of resources of civil initiatives. The paper features some possibilities of social and political interaction between urban communities and the regional authorities. The civil initiatives within the urban communities of Kuzbass appeared to be poorly formed, especially in terms of quality content, self-expression, the nature of the initiatives, and the scale of resource capacity of the local population. The authors believe that the modern practice of using and attracting resources of civil initiatives is at its early stage in the cities of Kuzbass. Some formats of interaction between the authorities and the community are gradually emerging, but the local communities seem to mistrust the local authorities, which makes the interaction irregular and sporadic. The processes of interaction between the urban communities and the authorities demonstrate cases of joint and autonomous (as a rule, initiated by the community) use of publicity opportunities for the implementation of formal and informal civil initiatives. However, formal civic initiatives fail to convey all the diversity of the social demands that could improve urban life.
social resource, civic activism, urban territories, social interaction, sociological research
1. Voronin P. Sociology and Internet: successful dialogue. Public Opinion Foundation, Database, 15.01.2005. Available at: http://bd.fom.ru/report/cat/smi/smi_int/gur050105 (accessed 24.04.2019). (In Russ.)
2. Terentiev E. A., Nefedova A. I., Gruzdev I. A. Visualization of questionnaire in on line surveys: how different design features impact the data quality. Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social change, 2016, (5): 1-15. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.5.01.
3. Sukhorykov D. V. Structural functional specific of urban environment as factor of socio-cultural development. Alma mater (Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly), 2018, (6): 116-120. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.06-18.116.
4. McQuire S. Geomedia: Networked cities and the future of public space. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018, 268. (In Russ.)
5. Hayek F. Initialism and the economic order, tr. Dmitrieva O. A., ed. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 2011, 394. (In Russ.)
6. Kozyrkov V. P. Character domesticates a modern society. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2009, (4): 86-92. (In Russ.)
7. Zhelnina A. A., Tikanova E. V. Formal and informal civic infrastructure: contemporary studies of urban local activism in Russia. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 2019, 22(1): 162-192. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2019.22.1.8
8. Pilkington H., Pollock G. "Politics are bollocks": youth, politics and activism in contemporary Europe. The Sociological Review, 2015, 63(S2): 1-35. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-954X.12260
9. Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. UC Press, 1979, 306.
10. Chicherin B. N. Philosophy of law. Moscow: Tipo-litografiia Tovarishchestva I. N. Kushnerev i K°, 1900, 337. (In Russ.)
11. Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space. St. Petersburg: Aleteia, 2013, 288. (In Russ.)
12. Shpak L. L., Logunova L. Yu., Golovatsky E. V., Kranzeeva E. A. Political consciousness and behavior: evolution and mobilization. Kemerovo: INT, 2016, 151. (In Russ.)
13. Ilyin V. I. Social structurization in the transitive space of the Russian metropolis. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiia. Etnologiia, 2010, 19(1): 89-125. (In Russ.)
14. Malakhova N. N. Innovative personality as a producer and a consumer: economic and socio-cultural consequences of formation and functioning. RUDN Journal of Economics, 2015, (1): 127-137. (In Russ.)
15. Inkeles A., Diamond L., Levinson D. J., Beier H., Hanfmann E. National character: a psycho-social perspective. Transaction Publishers, 1997, 392.
16. Orlova E. A. Modern urban culture and man. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 193. (In Russ.)
17. Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N., Molokova M. A. Civic initiatives and modernization of Russia. Moscow: Kliuch-S, 2011, 335. (In Russ.)
18. 335 s.
19. Yagodka N. N. Civic initiatives as an instrument of dialogue between government and civil society in Russia. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2015, (4): 128-140. (In Russ.)
20. Barash R. E. Factors of information and communication in self-organization of the Russians. Vlast, 2015, (11): 101-109. (In Russ.)
21. Golovatsky E. V. New sociology in the changed world: a review on "Normal anomie" in Russia and the modern world" (edited by S. A. Kravchenko, Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2017). Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (4): 177-182. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-4-177-182
22. "Normal anomie" in Russia and the modern world, ed. Kravchenko S. A. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2017, 281. (In Russ.)
23. Marien S., Hooghe M., Quintelier E. Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: a multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 2010, 58(1): 187-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00801.x
24. Fukuyama F. Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 2001, 22(1): 7-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144
25. Guseynova K. E. Breakthrough innovative projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the country. Research result. Sociology and management, 2018, 4(4): 78-86. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-7
26. Larina T. I., Iliina A. A. Reconstruction of social representations of the city using the GO-ALONG technique. Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social change, 2016, (3): 20-32. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.4.02
27. Opritnaia O. P. Trinitarian approach as methodological basis of complexity management. Sotsiologiia: 4M, 2005, (21): 29-50. (In Russ.)
28. Online research in Russia 2.0, ed. Davydov S. G. Moscow: Severo-Vostok, 2010, 336. (In Russ.)
