employee
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
The transition to a postindustrial — information economy is capable of ensuring multiple growth in labor productivity. Until now, there is unequivocal opinion on the system of factors of economic growth and increase in labor productivity; research results are often contradictory. To identify factors that determine labor productivity, a correlation analysis of the relationships between labor productivity and indicators characterizing socio-economic and innovative factors in the regions of the Central Federal District is performed. It was revealed that in 2015, 2016 and 2017 labor capital, non-obsolete fixed assets, investments in fixed assets, foreign investments, employed workers with higher education, the level of wages and income inequality, the number of students, the development of transport infrastructure, the use of computers and the Internet, the number of employees engaged in scientific research developments, including those with advanced degrees, graduate school graduation, innovative activity of organizations, and exports had a significant effect. The number of employees in government bodies has a negative effect. The multicollenarity of the indicators characterizing the tested factors will allow us to consider that half of the identified factors are independent.
information economy, labor productivity, productivity factors, regional statistical data, correlation analysis, multicollenarity of factors
1. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Postindustrial'nye uklady v jekonomike Rossii [Post-industrial structures in the economy of Russia]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ. 2017. 159 p. (In Russian)
2. Rastvortseva S.N. Labor productivity and capital-labor ratio in ensuring the economic growth of Russian regions [Social'noe prostranstvo] 2018, №1. Pp. 1-9. (In Russian)
3. Kirilyuk I.L. Models of production functions for the Russian economy [Komp'juternye issledovanija i modelirovanie] 2013. No. 2. P. 293-312. (In Russian)
4. Afanasyev A.A., Ponareva O.S. The production function of the national economy of Russia in 1990-2012 [Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody] 2014. №4. Pp. 21-33. (In Russian)
5. Makarov V.L., Ayvazyan S.A., Afanasyev M.Yu., Bakhtizin A.R., Nanavyan A.M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the regions of the Russian Federation taking into ac-count the intellectual capital, characteristics of readiness for innovations, level of well-being and quality of life of the population [Jekonomika regionov] 2014. №4. P. 9-30. (In Russian)
6. Mamonov M.E., Pestova A.A. Analysis of the technical efficiency of national econo-mies: the role of institutions, infrastructure and resource rent [Zhurnal Novoj jekonomicheskoj associacii] 2015, No. 3, p. 44-78. (In Russian)
7. Mankiw N., Romer D., Weil D. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992. Vol. 107. №2. P. 407-437.
8. Barro R., Lee J. Sources of Economic Growth (with comments from Nancy Stokey). Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 1994. Vol. 40. P. 1-57.
9. Merphy K., Shleifer A., Vishny R. The Allocation of Talent: Implication for Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991. Vol. 106. № 2. P. 503-530.
10. Khalafalla Ahmed Mohamed Arabi, Suliman Zakaria Suliman Abdalla. The Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Sudan. Research in World Economy. 2013. Vol. 4, No. 2. P. 104-136.
11. Ferdi Kesikoglu. Relationship Between Human Capital and Economic Growth: Panel Causality Analysis for Selected OECD Countries. Journal of Economic and Social Studies. 2013. V. 3. No. 1. P. 1-24.
12. Ramey G., Ramey A. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link Between Volatility and Growth. American Economic Review. 1995. Vol. 85. No. 5. 1139-1151.
13. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Study of the Economics of Regions of Russia: Econ-ometric Approach [Nauchnye issledovanija i razrabotki. Jekonomika] Research and Development. Economy. 2014. No. 2. P. 13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/3648 (In Russian)
