employee
Russian Federation
UDK 33 Экономика. Экономические науки
Introduction. There is an urgent need to assess the activity of Advanced Socio-Economic Development Territories (TASED) set up in single-industry towns and Administrative and Territorial Entities of Closed Type (ATECT). The research objective was to identify the current trends in the modus operandi of TASED set up in ATECT. Data and methods. The research featured official figures posted on the websites of the Russian Ministry of Economic Development, on the official websites of local authorities, regional government, Corporation of Far East’s Development, the resident companies of TASED, and various scientific publications. The research was based on comparative analysis and the factor and system analysis. The research results. The population of TASED territories revealed an almost equal distribution. However, its concentration is higher in the towns with over 500.000 residents. The number of residents appeared to correlate with the activity of small and medium-sized enterprises on the territory. Large investment projects in TASED of single-industry towns make up less than 5 % of all projects. The main TASED’s investor is local business. There are mostly low- and medium technology productions. At its current state, TASED do not encourage development of high-technology industries and knowledge-intensive services. The authors propose some options of budgetary efficiency assessment. Discussion and conclusion. TASED proved to be beneficial for the economic development of single-industry towns, especially those with a machine-building complex as core enterprise. However, TASED revealed to have no positive effect on distant depressed towns and single-industry towns with sustainable working core enterprises. The research results can be used by scientists, public authorities, and managers of TASED companies.
Administrative and Territorial Entities of Closed Type, diversification of single-industry economy, resident companies of TASED, city forming enterprise, territory development.
1. Dobrycheva I. V. The impact of status of the priority social and economic development areas on the labor of single-industry towns. Herald of Omsk University. Series "Economics", 2018, (2): 130-142. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.25513/1812-3988.2018.2.130-142
2. Evstafieva A. H. Territories with preferential conditions for doing business as a factor in the growth of the regional economy (on the example of the Republic of Tatarstan). Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki, 2018, (4): 163-173. (In Russ.)
3. Medzhidov Z. U. Comparative analysis of the use of territories with a special economic status in the Russian Federation. Vestnik of Volzhsky University after V. N. Tatishchev, 2017, 1(4): 254-262. (In Russ.)
4. Pracheva E. V. Comparison of regional policy instruments: the territory of advancing socio-economic development, the special economic zone, the zone of territorial development. Corporative Economics, 2018, (3): 4-11. (In Russ.)
5. Kolesnik E. A. The first territories of priority socio-economic development in the Chelyabinsk Region: experience and perspectives. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (2): 91-98. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-2-91-98
6. Larchenko O. V. Advanced development zones in single-industry urban settlements: problems and prospects (the case of the Republic of Karelia). Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (2): 106-113. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-2-106-113
7. Maliy V. I., Gusev V. V. Establishment of TASED in municipalities in the context of economic security (case study of the Petrovsk monotown of the Saratov Region). Bulletin of the volga region Institute of Administration, 2018, 18(4): 14-22. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2018-4-14-22
8. Nikolaeva E. E. Monotowns: social and economic problems and prospects (the case of the Ivanovo Region). Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (1): 137-142. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-1-137-142
9. Khabibrakhimov A. Zh. Advanced social and economic development areas (ASEDA): status assigned - what’s next? Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (3): 176-182. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-3-176-182
10. Rizov A. D. Development of the tased within the boundaries of the old industrial monocities. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (2): 133-138. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-2-133-138
11. Kuznetsov B. L., Galiullina G. F., Kuznetsova S. B. Territories of advanced socio-economic development and Industrialization 4.0 - non-intersecting trajectories. Proc. VIII All-Russian Symposium on Economic Theory. Ekaterinburg, September 26-27, 2018. Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN, 2018, 93-94. (In Russ.)
12. Shastitko A. E., Fatikhova A. F. Monotowns: A new take on the old problem. Baltiiskii region, 2015, (1): 7-35. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2015-1-1
13. Ryakhovskaya A. N., Kovan S. E., Kryukova O. G. The role of state programs in the development of single-industry cities. Moscow: Infra-M, 2014, 63. (In Russ.)
14. Manaeva I. V. The methodical approach to the development of scenarios of socio-economic development of mono-towns. Iamalskii vestnik, 2016, (1): 21-30. (In Russ.)
15. Alpatov G. E., Iakushkina A. A. The impact of the state of city-forming enterprises on single-industry towns stability. Nauchnyy zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya Ehkonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment, 2017, (2): 8-17. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17586/2310-1172-2017-10-2-8-17
16. Belchik T. A., Yakushina T. A. The impact of city-forming enterprises on diversification of the labour market in a single-industry town. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (2): 59-65. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-2-59-65
17. Kolesnik Ye. A. Threats and risks of diversification of economy of mono-industrial towns. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2018, (3): 47-52. (In Russ.)
18. Faikov D. Yu. Closed administrative and territorial entities. System transformations. Sarov: RFYATS-VNIIEF, 2012, 394. (In Russ.)
19. Karatayeva G. E. Comparative analysis of tax preferences of priority development areas in Russia. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki, 2018, (2): 112-120. (In Russ.)
20. Galiullina G. F. Institutional-synergetic approach to the planning of territories of advanced social and economic development. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (2): 73-84. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-2-73-84
21. Buchwald E. M., Valentik O. N. Small cities in the spatial regulation system of the Russian economy. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii, 2018, (1): 169-180. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2018.1.16
