Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
The econometric models constructed in the work allowed us to establish the main production factors that streamline the productivity level — per capita GRP in modern Russia. The most significant positive impact on productivity is exerted by capital, which estimated by the labor funds. The level of education of the employed population has a significant positive impact on productivity. In most regions of the country, new technologies, embodied in new fixed assets, have a positive impact on productivity. In most regions of the country, the number of officials has a significant negative impact on productivity.
econometric models, capital-human capital, new technologies, institutions.
В экономике Российской Федерации постепенно распространяется пятый технологический уклад — пятая технико-экономическая парадигма.
1. Barro R., Lee J. Sources of Economic Growth (with comments from Nancy Stokey). Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 1994. Vol. 40. P. 1-57.
2. Merphy K., Shleifer A., Vishny R. The Allocation of Talent: Implication for Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991. Vol. 106. No. 2. P. 503-530.
3. Khalafalla Ahmed Mohamed Arabi, Suliman Zakaria Suliman Abdalla. The Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Sudan. Research in World Economy. 2013. Vol. 4, No. 2. P. 43-53.
4. Ferdi Kesikoglu, Ozturk Zafer. Relationship between Human Capital and Economic Growth: Panel Causality Analysis for Selected OECD Countries. Journal of Economic and Social Studies. 2013. V. 3. No. 1. P. 153-162.
5. Young-Joon Kim. Effective Human Capital and Long-run Economic Growth. Korea and the World Economy, 2013. Vol. 14, No. 3. P. 475-616.
6. N. Gregory Mankiw. Principles of Economics. Cengage Learning. 2011. 888 p.
7. Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue. Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. McGraw-Hill / Irwin. 2005. 733 p.
8. Komarova A.S. The role of human capital in increase of labor productivity in Russia. Izvestiya tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Izvestia of the Tula state university. Economics and jurisprudence]. 2013. No. 5-1. Pp. 160-165. (in Russian)
9. Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70. P. 65-94.
10. Kormendi R., Meguire P. Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1985. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 141-163.
11. Ramey G., Ramey A. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between Volatility and Growth. American Economic Review. 1995. Vol. 85. No. 5. P. 1138-1151.
12. Daron Acemoglu, Ufuk Akcigit, Nicholas Bloom, William R. Kerr. Innovation, Reallocation and Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 18993. Issued in April 2013. Available at: http:// www.nber.org/papers/w18993.
13. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Ekonomicheskaya theory [Economics]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2010. (in Russian)
14. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Razvitie v Rossii jekonomki neravenstva [Development in the Russian housekeeper inequality]. Zhurnal jekonomicheskoj teorii [Journal of Economic Theory]. 2011. No. 4, pp. 198-202. (in Russian)
