Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
The article deals with John R. Searle’s approach to the problem of illocution, including his widely known classification of illocutionary acts. Arguable points and possibilities of resolving them are discussed. A new broader understanding of illocution and speech acts through the prism of modern communication studies is offered.
illocution, illocutionary act, communication, communicative act, function of well-being, model of present (MP), model of probable future (MPF), model of desired future (MDF), classification of illocutionary acts.
Введение
Вклад известного американского философа Дж. Сёрля в современную прагмалингвистику трудно переоценить. В своих ставших уже классическими работах 1960–1970-х гг. Сёрль разработал теорию косвенного речевого акта, развил основные принципы понимания специфики иллокутивного акта, плодотворно применил идею интенциональности к проблеме значения, ввел целый ряд, ставших весьма популярными концептуальный инноваций.
1. Avtoritetnost’ i kommunikatsiya [Authority and communication]. Voronezh, Voronezhskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., Aleynikovykh Publ., 2008. 216 p.
2. Vendler Z. Illokutivnoe samoubiystvo [Illocutive suicide]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. 1985, I. 16, pp. 241-247.
3. Zhuchkov D.O. Rechevoy akt ugrozy kak ob”ekt pragmalingvisticheskogo analiza: (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka). Kand. Diss. [Speech act of threat as an object of pragmalinguistic analysis: (on the material of the English language). Cand. Diss.]. Voronezh, 2010. 22 p.
4. Pocheptsov O.G. Osnovy pragmaticheskogo opisaniya predlozheniya [Fundamentals of the pragmatic description of the proposal]. Kiev, Vishcha shkola Publ., 1986. 116 p.
5. Serl’ Dzh. R. Klassifikatsiya illokutivnykh aktov [Classification of illocutionary acts]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. 1986, I. 17, pp. 170-194.
6. Serl’ Dzh. R. Chto takoe rechevoy akt [What is the speech act]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. 1986, I. 17, pp. 151-169.
7. Serl’ Dzh. R. Kosvennye rechevye akty [Indirect speech acts]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. 1986, I. 17, pp. 195-222.
8. Chernikov M.V. Obshchaya teoriya chelovecheskikh vzaimodeystviy. Kontseptual’noe vvedenie [General theory of human interactions. Conceptual introduction]. Voronezh, IMMiF Publ., 2013. 116 p.
9. Chernikov M.V. Kognitivnoe obespechenie chelovecheskoy deyatel’nosti [Cognitive support of human activity]. Vestnik Sankt-peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts]. 2016, I. 3, pp. 62-65.
10. Austin J.L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962. 167 p.
11. Bach K. Speech Acts and Pragmatics. Available at: http://online. sfsu.edu/~kbach/spchacts.html, svobodnyy (accessed 17 March 2017).
12. Bach K., Harnish R.M. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979. 217 p.
13. Ballmer T., Brennenstuhl W. Speech Act Classification. A study in the Lexical Analysis of English speech activity verbs // Springer Series in Language and Communication. 1981. Vol. 8. 274 p.
14. Leech G.N. Principles of Pragmatics. Longman Group Limited, 1983. 242 p.
15. Weigand E. 1989. Grundzuge des HandlungsspielsUnterweisen // Dialoganalyse II. Referateder 2.Arbeitstagung. 1988. Vol. 1. Pp. 257-271.
16. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, 1953. 349 p.
17. Wunderlich D. Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt. M.: Suhrkamp, 1976. 416 p.
