Stat'ya posvyaschena naibolee perspektivnomu innovacionnomu scenariyu social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federacii i znacheniyu finansovogo menedzhmenta dlya realizacii roli kommercheskih organizaciy v razvitii innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti. Provodya sravnenie prognoznyh variantov social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya po dannym Prognoza dolgosrochnogo social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 g., avtory prihodyat k vyvodu, chto v sovremennyh usloviyah naibolee perspektivnym yavlyaetsya innovacionnyy scenariy razvitiya. Odnako realizaciya dannogo scenariya sopryazhena s celym ryadom trudnostey i vozmozhna tol'ko pri primenenii na praktike kachestvenno novyh sistem upravleniya - kak na gosudarstvennom urovne, tak i na urovne otdel'no vzyatoy organizacii. V kontekste finansovogo menedzhmenta innovacii sleduet ponimat' kak celenapravlennuyu kommercializaciyu biznes-idey v dolgosrochnoy perspektive. Ob'ektivno voznikaet vopros ocenki innovaciy v aspekte finansovyh otnosheniy organizaciy. Poskol'ku innovaciya - eto slozhnaya sistema veroyatnostnyh aspektov s povyshennym urovnem riska, to lyuboe ocenivanie innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti nosit veroyatnostnyy harakter. No v lyubom sluchae neobhodimo zafiksirovat', chto innovacionnaya deyatel'nost' yavlyaetsya podsistemoy finansovogo menedzhmenta i dolzhna uchityvat'sya kak v finansovoy politike, tak i v finansovoy strategii organizacii. V sovremennoy nauchnoy literature innovacii v sisteme finansovogo menedzhmenta rassmatrivayut v osnovnom s pozicii finansirovaniya i ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti. Eta tochka zreniya rukovoditeley ne vsegda formiruet predpochteniya v pol'zu osuschestvleniya innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti. Dostupnost' i dostatochnost' finansovyh resursov dlya razrabotki i realizacii innovacionnyh proektov - prakticheski permanentnaya problema v finansovom menedzhmente, i, ochevidno, dolzhna uchityvat'sya v finansovoy strategii razvitiya kommercheskih organizaciy. V stat'e rassmotreno raznoobrazie klassifikaciy riskov innovacionnogo proekta, chto v svoyu ochered' privodit k raznoobraziyu metodik reakcii na innovacionnye riski v sisteme finansovogo menedzhmenta. Avtorami predlozhena sistema ocenki innovaciy, pozvolyayuschaya ne tol'ko kompleksno rassmotret' effektivnost' osuschestvlyaemoy innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti, no i ocenit' perspektivnye napravleniya ee razvitiya. Sistematizaciya innovaciy pozvolit formirovat' optimal'noe vzaimodeystvie finansovoy i innovacionnoy sostavlyayuschey v strategii razvitiya organizacii i, v zavisimosti ot osobennostey innovacii, razrabatyvat' i realizovyvat' podhodyaschie metody i instrumenty finansovogo upravleniya. Takim obrazom, dokazano, chto provedenie kompleksnoy ocenki innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti v sisteme finansovogo menedzhmenta naibolee perspektivno v dolgosrochnoy perspektive kak na urovne otdel'no vzyatoy kommercheskoy organizacii, tak i na urovne strany.
innovacionnaya deyatel'nost', finansovyy menedzhment, kommercheskaya organizaciya
1. Balabanov V.S., Repkina O.B., Entreprenership in the conditions of modernization of national economy on innovative type. Putevoditel’ predprinimatelya, no. 15, 2012, pp. 044-052. (In Russ.).
2. Bocharov V. V., Financial analysis: manual. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2014, 240 p. (In Russ.).
3. Gvelesiani T.V., Gladkova V.E., Social-economic importance of sustainable development of the financial markets: opportunities and threats. Russian Economic development: driver of growth or generator of challenges. Mathematic International Scientific-Practical Conference, Moscow, 2016, pp. 155-158. (In Russ.).
4. Gilyarovskaya L.T., Lysenko D.V., Endovitskii D.A., Comprehensive economic analysis of economic activities: Student book [Kompleksnyi ekonomicheskii analiz khozyaistvennoi deyatel’nosti: Uchebnik]. Moscow: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2013, 360 p. (In Russ.).
5. Gusov A.Z., Morgunov A.V., Chiyanova A.A., Essence and main directions of innovative development of industrial enterprise. Putevoditel’ predprinimatelya, no. 1, 2008, pp. 71-81. (In Russ.).
6. Zaleshchanskii B.D., Repkina O.B., Control system in modern conditions of managing. Uch. zapiski Ros. Akad. predprinimatel’stva, no. 31, 2012, pp. 249-253. (In Russ.).
7. Masloboev A.V., The method of integrated generation and evaluation of regional innovation structures effectiveness. Vestnik MGTU, vol. 11, no. 2, 2008, pp. 222-230. (In Russ.).
8. Il’enkova S.D., Gokhberg L.M., Kuznetsov V.I., Yagudin S. Yu., Innovation management: textbook, guide to study the course, workshop, training programme [Innovatsionnyi menedzhment: uchebnoe posobie, rukovodstvo po izucheniyu distsipliny, praktikum, uchebnaya programma]. Moscow: MESI, 2009, 124 p. (In Russ.).
9. Krylov E. I., Vlasova V.M., Ovodenko A.A., Analysis of the efficiency of investments and innovations: proc. allowance [Analiz effektivnosti investitsii i innovatsii: ucheb. posobie]. St. Petersburg: SPGUAEP, 2003, 506 p. (In Russ.).
10. Gladkova V.E., Pankratova M.N., Reforming the system of financial control at the present stage. Russian Economic development: driver of growth or generator of challenges. Mathematic International Scientific- Practical Conference, Moscow, 2016, pp. 159-162 (In Russ.).
11. Repkina O.B., Bryksin A. Yu., “Problems of risks classification”. Uch. zapiski Ros. Akad. predprinimatel’stva, no. 33, 2012, pp. 125-132 (In Russ.).
12. Rusavskaya A.V., Investments and investment potential of the region. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, no. 1 (37), 2012, pp. 33. (In Russ.).
13. Rusavskaya A.V., Financial-credit system of development of regional investment activities: forms and methodology [Finansovo-kreditnaya sistema razvitiya regional’noi investitsionnoi deyatel’nosti: formy i metodologiya]. Moscow: Ministry of education and science, Russian Academy of entrepreneurship, 2011. (In Russ.).
14. Ryazanov M. A., Composition of Methods of Innovation Activity Efficiency Definition. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki, no. 9, 2011, pp. 3-12 (In Russ.).
15. Nelson, Richard R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York: Oxford U Press, 1993. Print.
16. Twiss, Brian C. Managing technological innovation: Brian C. Twiss. London: Pitman, 2001. Print.
17. Viana, Felipe A.C., Timothy W. Simpson, Vladimir Balabanov, and Vasilli Toropov. “Special Section on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come?” AIAA Journal 52.4 (2014): 670-90. Web.
