Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article substantiates benchmarks of reindustrialization economy, Russia. While reindustrialization is understood as a technology base, capable of concurrent development of industry and the economy as a whole. The authors examine the global trend of decline in the share of industry in the gross product of the developed countries and the aim is to find indicators of development communication industry with the development of the economy as a whole. Based on the analysis of statistical information of development indicators large technologically developed countries it is demonstrated that long-term acceleration of economies is based on accelerating their industrial component. It is proved that there is a single quantitative indicator of the quality of the economy and its industrial sector, which is characterized by the ability of these macrosystems for longer-term accelerating their development. The article substantiates that industrial policy must be based on the use of previously unknown indicative guidelines development: macroconstants of development of economies and their industrial sector. The range of quantitative ratio of quality indicators of economy and quality indicators of their industry, the prevailing for most of the major countries of the world technological leaders. The authors consider the roots of pushback to development of technological environment and it is proved that there are promising developments of Russian researchers on technology reform in the large socioeconomic systems, and positive changes in the provocation techniques backward technological habitat.
reindustrialization strategy, development management, macroconstants development, the economic level of technology, industry, technological habitat.
Задача индустриализации экономики России, заодно избавление от сырьевой ориентации, стоит на повестке дня более ста лет [1–3]. Академик В.М. Полтерович в 2008 г. заметил, что «Надо осознать, что российский ВВП на душу населения составляет примерно 30% американского.
1. Aganbegyan A.G. Ehkonomika Rossii na rasput’e... Vybor postkrizisnogo prostranstva [Russia’s economy is at a crossroads... the Choice of post-crisis space]. Moscow, AST, Astrel’ Publ., 2010. 379 p.
2. Polterovich V., Popov V., Tonis A. Mekhanizmy «resursnogo proklyatiya» i ekonomicheskaya politika [Mechanisms of «resource curse» and economic policy]. Voprosy ehkonomiki [Economic issues], 2007, I. 6, pр. 4-27. (in Russian)
3. Polterovich V.M. Elementy teorii reform [Elements of the theory of reforms]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ, 2007. 447 р.
4. Grinberg R.S. Ekonomika sovremennoy Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy [The economy of modern Russia: state, problems, prospects]. Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN [Bulletin of the Institute of Economics, RAS]. 2015, I. 1, рp. 10-29. (in Russian)
5. Buzgalin A., Kolganov A. Planirovanie: potentsial i rol' v rynochnoy ekonomike XXI veka [Planning: potential and role in the market economy of the XXI century]. Voprosy ehkonomiki [Economic issues]. 2016, I. 1, pр. 63-80. (in Russian)
6. Mau V. Antikrizisnye mery ili strukturnye reformy: ekonomicheskaya politika Rossii v 2015 godu [Anti-crisis measures or structural reforms: Russia's economic policy in 2015]. Voprosy ehkonomiki [Economic issues]. 2016, I. 2, pp. 5-33. (in Russian)
7. Denisov I.V., Yusim V.N. Ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskaya kontseptsiya vozniknoveniya firm i rynkov [Economic-technological concept of the emergence of firms and markets]. Zurnal ehkonomicheskoj teorii [Journal of economic theory], 2011, I. 3, pp. 144-156. (in Russian)
8. Glaz’ev S. U. Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyah global’nogo krizisa [The strategy of outstripping development of Russia in conditions of global crisis]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2010, 287 p.
9. Inozemcev V.L. Sovremennoe postindustrial’noe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy [Modern postindustrial society: nature, contradictions, perspectives]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2000, 304 p.
10. Behll D. Gryadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo [Future post-industrial society]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 1999. 788 p.
11. Menger K. Osnovaniya politicheskoj ehkonomii [The Foundation of political economy]. Izbrannye raboty [In Selected Works]. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2005, 496 р.
12. Bystrov A., Yusim V., Curtis T. Macroconstants of Development: A new benchmark for the strategic development of advanced countries and firms Int. J. of Business and Globalisation, 2015.
13. Bystrov A., Yusim V., Fialkovskij D. Tekushchie konstanty makroekonomicheskogo razvitiya stran - tekhnologicheskikh liderov [Constant current macroeconomic development of countries - technological leaders]. Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN [Bulletin of the Institute of Economics, RAS]. 2015, I. 4, pр. 157-171. (in Russian)
14. Bellman R. Dinamicheskoe programmirovanie [Dynamic programming]. Moscow, Inostr. lit. Publ., 1960. 400 р.
15. Dvorcin M.D., Yusim V.N. Tekhnodinamika: osnovy teorii formirovaniya i razvitiya tekhnologicheskih system [Technoceramica: fundamentals of the theory of formation and development of technological systems]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnyj fond istorii nauki, «Diksi» Publ., 1993. 320 р.
16. Makarov V.L., Rubinov A.M. Matematicheskaya teoriya ehkonomicheskoj dinamiki i ravnovesiya [The mathematical theory of economic dynamics and equilibrium]. Moscow, Nauka Publ, 1973. 338 p.
17. Kac A.I. Dinamicheskij ehkonomicheskij optimum [The dynamic economic optimum]. Moscow, Ehkonomika Publ., 1970. 198 p.
18. Trapeznikov V.A. Upravlenie. Ehkonomika. Tekhnicheskij progress [Management. Economy. Technical progress]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983. 224 p.
19. Kurakov I.G. Nauka i effektivnost’ obshchestvennogo proizvodstva [Science and the efficiency of social production]. Voprosy filosofii [The problems of philosophy]. 1989, I. 1, pр. 5-20. (in Russian)
20. Yusim V.N. Prognoznye vozmozhnosti pokazatelya «Ekonomicheskiy uroven' tekhnologii» [The predictive capabilities of the indicator «Economic level of technology»]. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic analysis: theory and practice]. 2005, I. 5, pp. 2-13. (in Russian)
21. Yusim V.N. Upravlenie makroekonomicheskim razvitiem v usloviyakh nesovershennoy tekhnologicheskoy i institutsional’noy sredy [Managing macroeconomic development in an imperfect technological and institutional environment]. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice]. 2010, I. 5, pp. 2-13.
22. Upravlenie promyshlennym razvitiem v usloviyakh otstaloy tekhnologicheskoy sredy [Management of industrial development in a backward technological environment]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2016. 200 p.
23. Galanov V.A. Al’ternativnye varianty razvitiya mirovogo khozyaystva [Alternative options for the development of the world economy]. Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal «Nauka i praktika» Rossijskogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta meni G.V. Plekhanova [The scientific-analytical journal Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov]. 2015, I. 4 (20), pр. 14-28. (in Russian)
24. Betz F. Basic research and technology transfer. Intern, j. of technology management. Exeter, 1994. Vol. 9, I. 5/6/7, pp. 784-796.
25. Yusim V.N., Kolokolov V.A. Kulapov M. N., Denisov I.V. O sisteme pryamogo upravleniya makroekonomicheskim razvitiem [The direct control system of macroeconomic development]. Ekonomist [The economist]. 2010, I. 12, pр. 7-18. (in Russian)
26. Dvorcin M.D., Yusim V.N., Reznik S.E. Printsip provokatsii polozhitel’nykh tendentsiy [The principle of provocation positive trends]. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic analysis: theory and practice]. 2005, I. 17(50), pр. 2-4. (in Russian)
