23 years have passed since the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993, but the question of the place and the role of the category of constitutional forms of ownership remains debatable. The article discusses the purpose of the form of ownership in the constitutional regulation of economic relations, an analysis of the main approaches to the evaluation of the legal significance of this category, argues that a formal stance on ownership’s nature gives a distorted view of the methods of legal influence on the economy. Despite the denial of the form of ownership’s ideological aspects in modern democratic constitutions this category has social elements. It is shown that an assessment of the constitutional form of ownership should be carried out by economic and social and legal aspects. Based on the texts of various states’ constitutions the analysis of the basic dimensions of the form of property exercise is undertaken, including also other aspects such as promoting advanced management methods, provisioning traditional economic structures and protecting particularly important property. The article demonstrates the interconnection of the constitutional form of ownership with organizational-legal forms of business. In this connection the nature and the purpose of the private and public forms of ownership are taken into account. Otherwise it is difficult to mark the necessary boundaries and ways of state participation in the economy. The conclusion defines that the constitutional ownership is an essential tool for building the optimal model of economy by means of supporting the most promising and traditional ways of economic management.
ownership form, constitution, economic model, ways of economic managing.
1. Alekseev N. N. Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo. M., 2003.
2. Andreeva G. N. Munitsipal´naya sobstvennost´ v sovremennykh konstitutsiyakh zarubezhnykh stran. Mestnoe pravo. 2002. № 9-10.
3. Andreeva G. N. Ekonomicheskaya konstitutsiya v zarubezhnykh stranakh. M., 2006.
4. Bakirova E. Yu., Kitaeva A. E. Pravo sobstvennosti gosudarstvennoy korporatsii cherez prizmu konstitutsionnogo razgranicheniya form sobstvennosti. Vlast´ Zakona. 2014. № 1.
5. Borodach M. V. Metodologicheskie prevratnosti prakticheskoy realizatsii norm Konstitutsii Rossii o formakh sobstvennosti, ili «Publichna li publichnaya sobstvennost´?». Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal´noe pravo. 2014. № 12.
6. Veger L. L. Sootnoshenie form sobstvennosti. Sobstvennost´ v KhKh stoletii. M., 2001.
7. Vinnitskiy A. V. Publichnaya sobstvennost´. M., 2013.
8. Vlasova M. N. Pravo sobstvennosti v Rossii: vozniknovenie, yuridicheskoe soderzhanie, puti razvitiya. M., 2002.
9. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast´ pervaya. Nauch.-prakt. kommentariy / otv. red. T. E. Abova, A. Yu. Kabalkin, V. P. Mozolin. M., 1996.
10. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Chast´ pervaya: uchebnik / pod red. A. G. Kalpina, A. I. Maslyaeva. M., 1997.
11. Egorov N. D. Tipy, vidy i formy sobstvennosti i prava sobstvennosti v SSSR. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1985. № 5.
12. Zgonnikov P. P. Pravovye pozitsii po voprosam sootnosheniya sobstvennosti i prava sobstvennosti. Sovremennoe pravo. 2016. № 2.
13. Istochniki pravovogo regulirovaniya kooperatsii (obzor zarubezhnogo zakonodatel´stva). URL: http://www.eurasialegal.info/index.php?option=com_content&;view=article&id=1680:2013-01-15-08-06-38&catid=36:2010-12-14-07-45-12&Itemid=42.
14. Kirpichev A. E. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo printsipa priznaniya i ravnoy zashchity form sobstvennosti v pravovom regulirovanii predprinimatel´skoy deyatel´nosti i sudebnoy praktike. Rossiyskiy sud´ya. 2013. № 11.
15. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu RF chasti pervoy, postateynyy / ruk. avt. kol. O. N. Sadikov. 3-e izd. M., 2005.
16. Kommentariy k Konstitutsii RF. M., 2002.
17. Lobacheva E. N. Ekonomika: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 2003.
18. Loskutov V. I. Ekonomicheskie i pravovye otnosheniya sobstvennosti. Rostov n/D., 2002.
19. Meriminskaya E. Gosudarstvo i goskompanii kontroliruyut 70% rossiyskoy ekonomiki. Vedomosti. 2016. 29 sent.
20. Rzhevskiy V. A. Obshchestvennyy stroy razvitogo sotsializma. Konstitutsionnoe soderzhanie, struktura, regulirovanie. M., 1983.
21. Rubanov A. A. Evolyutsiya zakonodatel´noy konstruktsii sobstvennosti: osnovnye tendentsii. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1989. № 8.
22. Ryzhenkov A. Ya., Chernomorets A. E. Ocherki teorii prava sobstvennosti (proshloe i nastoyashchee). Volgograd, 2005.
23. Sklovskiy K. I. Sobstvennost´ v grazhdanskom prave: ucheb.-prakt. posobie. 2-e izd. M., 2002.
24. Sukhanov E. A. Lektsii u1086 o prave sobstvennosti. M., 1991.
25. Sukhanov E. A. Ponyatie prava sobstvennosti v rossiyskom zakonodatel´stve i v model´nom Grazhdanskom kodekse dlya stran SNG. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochno-evropeyskoe obozrenie. 2000. № 4, № 5.
26. Sukhanov E. A. Pravo sobstvennosti v sovremennoy Rossii. Sobstvennost´ v KhKh stoletii. M., 2001.
27. Shchennikova L. V. Veshchnye prava v grazhdanskom prave Rossii. M., 1996.
28. Yakobson L. I. Gosudarstvennyy sektor ekonomiki: ekonomicheskaya teoriya i politika: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 2000.
