ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF STAGING DECOMPRESSION/STABILIZATION INTERVENTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TANDEM STENOSIS OF CERVICAL AND LUMBAR SPINE
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The concept of “tandem stenosis” comprises combination of degenerative stenosis in both cervical and lumbar spine. At the moment, there is no consistent approach to the surgical procedures in this group of patients, as well as the research-ers do not pay much attention in their papers to the sequence and stage-by-stage approach to the procedures and to the analysis of combined surgical procedures. The aim of the research was to analyze the results of staging decompression/stabilization interventions in the treatment of patients with tandem stenosis of cervical and lumbar spine. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected results of treatment of 46patients with combined (tandem) stenosis of cervical and lumbar spine. The patients were operated in four neurosurgical clinical units of Vladivostok, Irkutsk and Novosibirsk. We assessed clinical data: level of pain syndrome – using visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Oswestry disability index (ODI), MacNab and Nurick clinical outcomes, as well as the results of plain spine radiography and neuroimaging studies (MRI, MSCT). Multicenter study of the results of staging surgical procedures with the use of specialized microsurgical instruments in the treatment of patients with tandem stenosis of cervical and lumbar spine allowed us to confirm their high clinical and radiological effectiveness.

Keywords:
tandem spinal stenosis, less traumatic decompression of spinal canal, minimally invasive stabilization
References

1. ByvaltsevVA, BelykhEG, SorokovikovVA, ArsentievaNI(2011). The use of scales and questionnaires in vertebrol-ogy [Ispol’zovanie shkal i anket v vertebrologii]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S.Korsakova, 111(9-2), 51-56.

2. Byvaltsev VA, Sorokovikov VA, Kalinin AA, EgorovAA,Belykh EG (2015). Clinical case of surgical treatment of degenerative stenosis on two levels of thoracic spine [Klinicheskiy primer khirurgicheskogo lecheniya degenerativnogo stenoza na dvukh urovnyakh v grudnom otdele pozvonochnika]. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I.Pirogova, (7), 93-96.

3. Byvaltsev VA, Shepelev VV, Nikiforov SB, Kalinin AA (2016). Isolated and combined degenerative tandem-stenosis of cervical and lumbar spine: review of literature [Izolirovannye i sochetannye degenerativnye tandem-stenozy pozvonochnogo kanala sheynogo i poyasnichnogo otdelov pozvonochnika: obzor literatury]. Khirurgiya pozvonochnika, 2 (13), 52-61.

4. ArinzonZ, AdunskyA, FidelmanZ (2004). Out-comes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal steno-sis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur. Spine J., (13 ), 32-37.

5. BajwaNS, ToyJO, AhnNU (2013). Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with con-genital bony stenosis of the thoracic spine? An anatomic study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 26(1), 1-5.

6. BaiwaNS, ToyJO, AhnNU (2012). Is lumbar steno-sis associated with thoracic stenosis? A study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens. Spine J., 12(12), 1142-1146.

7. CaronTH, BellGR (2007). Combined (tandem) lum-bar and cervical stenosis. Semin. Spine Surg., (19 ), 44-46.

8. ClowardRB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg., 15(6), 602-617.

9. DagiTF, TarkingtonMA, LeechJJ (1987). Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis: natural history, prog-nostic indices, and results after surgical decompression. J.Neurosurg., (66 ), 842-849.

10. HongCC, LiuKPG (2015). A rare case of mul-tiregional spinal stenosis: clinical description, surgical complication, and management concept review. Global Spine J., 5(1), 49-54.

11. HsiehCH, HuangTJ, HsuRW (1998). Tandem spinal stenosis: clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment. Changgeng Yi XueZaZhi,(21 ), 429-435

12. LaBanMM, GreenML (2004). Concurrent (tan-dem) cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: a 10-year re-view of 54 hospitalized patients. Am. J. Phys.Med. Rehabil., (83 ), 187-190.

13. MadillHM, BrintnellESG, FitzsimmonsGW, StewinLL, MacnabD, CasserlyMC (1986). Work related issues in occupational therapy: yourvaluesdo count. Can. J. Occup. Ther., (53), 113-118.

14. NaderiS, MertolT (2002). Simultaneous cervical and lumbar surgery for combined symptomatic cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., (15), 229-231.

15. RahmanianA, MinagarS, RakeiSM, TaghipoorM,MehrabaniG, RazmkonA (2014). A survey of tandem spi-nal stenosis in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Neurosurg. Quarterly,25(2), 1-4.

16. TengP, PapatheodorouC (1964). Combined cervi-cal and lumbar spondylosis. Arch. Neurol., (10), 298-307.

17. TracyJA, BertelsonJD (2010). Cervical spondy-lotic myelopathy. Neurologist, 16(3), 176-187.

18. WiltseLL, SpencerCW (1988) . New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine,13(6), 696-706.

19. YamashitaK, OhzonoK, HiroshimaK (2006). Five-year outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study of symptom severity at standard intervals after surgery. Spine, (31), 1484-1490.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?