Russian Federation
UDC 327
UDC 342.4
This article examines how Russia and China have appropriated the concept of "Dialogue of Civilisations." Originally a civil society framework that received formal international institutional expression through UN General Assembly Resolution 56/6 (2001), the concept rested on the premise that genuine inter-civilizational exchange must operate independently of state power. Over two decades, both states have systematically converted this concept into an instrument of state policy—yet they have followed structurally opposite institutional paths. The article proposes a three-stage institutionalization model consisting of discursive extraction, normative codification, and constitutional consolidation with insulation. It introduces the concept of "norm production" to describe cases where states act as originators rather than recipients of norms. Applied to Russia, the model traces a complete introversion-defense pathway culminating in the 2020 constitutional amendments. Applied to China, it traces an extroversion-projection pathway extending from the 2004 Beijing Forum to the inaugural Ministerial Conference on Global Civilization Dialogue held in Beijing in 2025. The comparative analysis yields three findings. Russia has completed all three stages; China remains at Stage Two, without constitutional embedding. What determines the institutional form of Politicisation is not civilizational content itself but the structure of external normative pressure: direct institutional threats drive introversion, while diffuse discursive competition drives extroversion. Constitutional insulation is not a binary state but a spectrum, whose effectiveness depends on the stability of elite consensus and on the degree of alignment between constitutional provisions and ordinary legislation.
dialogue of civilisations, politicization, norm production, three-stage institutionalization model, Russia, China, conditional constitutional insulation, introversion–extroversion spectrum
1. Guan X.L. Eluosi jingji de xianzhuang, wenti yu fazhan qushi [The Current Situation, Problems and Development Trends of the Russian Economy]. Eluosi Zhongya Dong'ou Yanjiu [Russian, Central Asian and East European Studies]. 2008, I. 4, pp. 27-35. (In Chinese).
2. Laruelle M. Russia's Central Asia Policy and the Role of Russian Nationalism. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program Silk Road Paper. 2008, 81 p. (In Russian,
3. Lu N.Q. Eluosi jingji zhuanxing 30 nian pingxi [A 30-Year Review of Russia's Economic Transformation]. Tansuo yu Zhengming [Exploration and Free Views]. 2021, I. 3, pp. 150-159. (In Chinese).
4. Suslov M. "Russian World": Russia's Policy towards its Diaspora. Paris, IFRI Publ., 2017, 36 p. (In Russian)
5. Khalatyan H. Vneshnyaya politika Armenii: novye realii i neyasnye perspektivy [Armenia's Foreign Policy: New Realities and Unclear Prospects]. Analytical Centre for Strategic Studies and Initiatives. 28.06.2022. Available at: https://acssi.am/2022/06/28/1823/. (In Russian, accessed: 10.04.2026). (In Russian).
6. Yakunin V.I. Dialog tsivilizatsii dlya postroeniya mirnikh i inklyuzivnikh obshchestv. [A Dialogue of Civilisations for Shaping Peaceful and Inclusive Societies]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. 2012, I. 5, pp. 8-16. (In Russian).
7. Acharya A. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization. 2004, V. 58, I. 2, pp. 239-275. (In English).
8. Buzan B., Wæver O., de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers Publ., 1998, 239 p. (In English).
9. Finnemore M., Sikkink K. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 1998, V. 52, I. 4, pp. 887-917. (In English).
10. Ginsburg T. Democracies and International Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2021, 329 p. (In English).
11. Hirschl R. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, Harvard University Press Publ., 2004, 286 p. (In English).
12. Keohane R.O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 1984, 290 p. (In English).
13. Knox Z. Russian Society and the Orthodox Church: Religion in Russia after Communism. London, Routledge Publ., 2005, 257 p. (In English).
14. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications Publ., 2004, 413 p. (In English).
15. Mahoney J., Thelen K. (eds.) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2010, 254 p. (In English).
16. Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005, 659 p. (In English).
17. Petito F. The Global Political Discourse of Dialogue among Civilizations: Mohammad Khatami and Václav Havel. Global Change, Peace & Security. 2007, V. 19, I. 2, pp. 103-126. (In English).
18. Reus-Smit C. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 1999, 199 p. (In English).
19. Schmidt V.A. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science. 2008, V. 11, pp. 303-326. (In English).
20. Vandenbroucke G. Rising Productivity, Declining Population Impact Russia's Economy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Regional Economist. 2016, January. pp. 10-11. Available at: https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/january-2016/rising-productivity- declining-population-impact-russias-economy (accessed: 10.04.2026).
21. Walt S.M. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, Cornell University Press Publ., 1987, 321 p. (In English).
22. Waltz K.N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Addison-Wesley Publ., 1979, 251 p. (In English).
23. Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1999, 429 p. (In English).
