Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This article provides some insight into foreign states’ regulation of seized property and weaknesses and opportunities for increasing effectiveness of existing regimes. Asset confiscation through proceeds of crime legislation, as well as assets originated from corruption, has taken on a new lease of life over the past few years. The main object of criminal proceeds confiscation laws is to divestiture the financial gain derived from criminal activity and to relinquish it to the state. The author evaluates the legislation and practice in the framework of regulation of seized property in Europe, USA and Australia, and lays stress on social reuse of propriety. In author’s opinion, Italian experience in transferring confiscated assets to local authorities in favour of the society is especially interesting for Russia. It is noted that besides achieving the common goal to seize illicit assets from criminals to the subsequent payment of compensation to victims of crime, to fight against organized crime, terrorism and economic crimes, it is important to create an economically viable asset recovery system, preserving their value in the interests of the state, society and victims, as well as ensuring accountability, transparency and public confidence in the system of asset recovery.

Keywords:
regulation of seized property, seizure, proceeds of crime, corruption, social reuse, social entrepreneurship, reimbursement for victims.
References

1. A Guide to Equitable Sharing for State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies. April 2009. URL: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-ri/legacy/2012/03/26/esguidelines.pdf.

2. Audit of the Assets Forfeiture Fund and Seized Asset Deposit Fund Annual Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2014. January 2015. URL: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2015/a1508.pdf#page=1).

3. Confiscated Mafia Loot Worth Billions Gives Italy an Unexpected Problem. URL: http: //www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/10/confiscated-mafia-loot-worth-billions-gives-italyan-unexpected-problem.

4. Dall’Oca A. Berceto, villa confiscata al camorrista diventa centro civico per bimbi e anziani. URL: http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2012/01/04/berceto-villa-confiscata-camorrista-diventacentro-civico-bimbi-anziani/181542/.

5. Disposal of Confiscated Assets in the EU Member States: Laws and Practices. URL: http://www.csd.bg/artShow.php?id=17103.

6. Media Statement on Progress Made by the Justice, Crime Prevention & Security Cluster in the Fight against Corruption. URL: http://www.justice.gov.za/m_statements/2013/20130609-jcpscorruption.html.

7. Picciotto L. Social Entrepreneurship and Confiscated Mafia Properties in Italy. Business Administration, University of Palermo EMES-SOCENT Conference Selected Papers, No. LG13-73 4th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise. Liege, 2013. URL: http://emes.net/site/wp-content/uploads/Picciotto_ECSP-LG13-73.pdf.

8. PROGETTO PON SICUREZZA 2007-2013. Il riutilizzo dei beni confiscati. URL: http://www.transcrime.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/PON_2-Il_riutilizzo_dei_beni_confiscati-D2.3-Final.pdf.

9. Report of the International Expert Group Meeting on Effective Management and Disposal of Seized or Frozen and Confiscated Assets, Held in Vienna from 7 to 9 September 2015. URL: https://cms.unov.org/LLSULinkbase/ContentTree.aspx?nodeID=74487.

10. Review: Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Equipment Acquisition Executive Office of the President. December 2014. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/federal_support_for_local_law_enforcement_equipment_acquisition.pdf.

11. Golovanova N. A. Konfiskatsiya vs. Korruptsii (zarubezhnyy opyt). Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel´stva i sravnitel´nogo pravovedeniya. 2015. № 3.

12. Golovanova N. A. Konfiskatsiya kak reaktsiya na korystnoe prestuplenie. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1915. № 7.

13. Perspektivy primeneniya mekhanizmov zamorazhivaniya, aresta i konfiskatsii prestupnykh aktivov, mekhanizmov upravleniya konfiskovannymi aktivami / V. I. Lafitskiy i dr.; otv. red. V. I. Lafitskiy. M., 2014.

14. Sakovich O. M. Nekommercheskie yuridicheskie litsa v zakonodatel´stve Chekhii i Slovakii. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel´stva i sravnitel´nogo pravovedeniya. 2016. № 1.

15. Ugolovno-pravovye mery po protivodeystviyu korruptsii za rubezhom: sravnitel´no-pravovoe issledovanie / I. S. Vlasov, N. A. Golovanova, A. A. Men´shikh i dr.; otv. red. I. S. Vlasov. M., 2014.

16. Yuridicheskie litsa v grazhdanskom prave zarubezhnykh stran: monografiya / O. V. Gavrilyuk, N. I. Gaydaenko Sher, D. O. Grachev i dr.; otv. red. N. G. Semilyutina. M., 2015.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?