The article deals with the doctrinal approaches to the meaning of the term “grounds” for international responsibility. The authors analyze the points of view expressed by national writers on to the problem in question as well as and the norms of international law which specify the situations where a state may be called upon to be held liable internationally. Given the existing complexities, determination of such grounds calls for a greater regulation of states’ liability which may entail international liability. Meanwhile the existing practical difficulties in the process of finding of these grounds show the necessity for a detailed regulation of obligations of states.
international responsibility, grounds of responsibility, obligations of a state, internationally wrongful act, invocation of responsibility.
1. Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia). Preliminary Objections. March 17, 2016. International Court of Justice. URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/155/18948.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.08.2016).
2. Construction of a Road In Costa Rica Along The San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica). Judgment. December 16, 2015. International Court of Justice. URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/152/18848.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.08.2016).
3. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Merits, Judgment. I. C. J. Reports 1986.
4. The “Monte Confurco” Case (Seychelles v. France). Application for Prompt Release. Judgment of 18 December 2000. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. URL: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_6/Judgment.18.12.00.E.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.08.2016).
5. Alikhadzhieva protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Alihadzhiyeva v. Russia): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 5 iyulya 2005 g., zhaloba № 68007/01. Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo suda. 2008. № 3.
6. Vakhaeva i drugie protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Vakhaeva and Others v. Russia): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 29 oktyabrya 2009 g., zhaloba № 1758/04. Byulleten´ Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2010. № 10.
7. Lukashuk I. I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. M., 2004.
8. Malika Alikhadzhieva protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Malika Alikhadjiyeva v. Russia): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 24 maya 2011 g., zhaloba № 37193/08. Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo suda. 2013. № 1.
9. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / P. N. Biryukov. 5-e izd. M., 2012.
10. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov / otv. red. G. V. Ignatenko, O. I. Tiunov. 4-e izd. M., 2007.
11. Rusinova V. N. Khassan protiv Velikobritanii: ot konventsii k mezhdunarodnomu gumanitarnomu pravu i nemnogo obratno. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. 2015. № 3.
12. Sazonova K. L. Osnovaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstv v mezhdunarodnom prave. Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2012. № 4.
13. Ushakov N. A. Osnovaniya mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstv. M., 1983.
14. Khassan protiv Soedinennogo Korolevstva: postanovlenie ESPCh po zhalobe № 29750/09. Byulleten´ Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. 2013. № 11.
15. Khachaturov R. L. Voprosy mezhdunarodno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti. Vektor nauki Tol´yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 1.
16. Chiragov i drugie (Chiragov and others) protiv Armenii: postanovlenie ESPCh ot 22 yanvarya 2015 g., zhaloba № 13216/05. Byulleten´ Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. 2015. № 12.
17. Yandiev i drugie (Yandijev and Others) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii: postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 17 sentyabrya 2013 g., zhaloby № 34531/06, 43811/06 i 1578/07. Byulleten´ Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. 2014. № 10.
