NEW TECHNOLOGICAL WAYS IN THE REGIONS OF RUSSIA
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Distribution of new — the fifth and sixth technological ways in economy of regions of Russia is investigated. For economic evaluation of technological structures hysterical time series of real per capita GDP of Great Britain are used. Construction of econometric models of cyclical trends has allowed establishing the date of the beginning of the upward half-waves of the fourth and fifth Kondratieff cycles. For the construction of econometric models of technological structures was assumed that the beginning of upward half-waves cycles coincide with the beginning of the upward wave of new orders, since the beginning of the dominance of another way of life and a torque of the withering away of the old order. We used piecewise linear model orders. By the simulation it was found, that the relic and fourth technological orders provide a contribution to real GDP per capita value of 4000 Gehry-Hemis dollars in 1990. The contribution of the new — the fifth and sixth in the Russian economy is estimated as the excess of the value of real per capita GDP over the contribution of relic and fourth technological structures, evaluated according to the UK. This has allowed for the first time to give an economic assessment of the contribution of new orders in the Russian economy. It now has exceeded 50%. By degree of distribution of new ways in the groups of regions is irregular. The regional group in the economy where new ways are not observed, the economic policy directed to the continued industrialization. In the regions, where new ways make contribution to the economies, economic policy should focus on the development of post-industrial economies.

Keywords:
Kondratieff cycles, technological orders, econometric models,productivity, the real per capita GDP.
Text

Работа выполнена при поддержке гранта РГНФ № 15-02-00369.

Эволюция индустриальных и постиндустриальных экономических систем сопровождается ростом производительности труда и объемов национального производства. Эта эволюция демонстрирует долгосрочные циклы экономического развития, которые получили известность как циклы Кондратьева, длительность циклов считается равной 40–60 годам [1–4]. С циклами Кондратьева связывают смену технико-экономических парадигм — технологических укладов, преобладающих в экономике [5–9]. Технологический уклад представляет собой экономическую систему, характеризующуюся некоторыми особенностями производства и потребления благ. Современные пятый и шестой технологические уклады характеризуются существенно более высокими уровнем производительности и объемом национального производства по сравнению с ранними укладами [10, 11]. Оценки распространения технологических укладов основываются на отнесении конкретных товаров, услуг, технологий, используемых энергетических ресурсов к определенным технологическим укладам на основе их свойств, технических характеристик.

References

1. Kondratieff N. The Long Waves in Economic Life. Martino Fine Books. 2014. 28 p.

2. Alexander M. The Kondratieff Cycle. Lincoln, NE: Writer´s Club Press. 2002. 288 p.

3. Narkus S. Kondratieff, N. and Schumpeter, Joseph A. Longwaves theory. Universities Oslo. 2012. 80 p.

4. Nefiodow L., Nefiodow S. The Sixth Kondratieff: A New Long Wave in the Global Economy. Createspace Independent Pub. 2014. 264 p.

5. Glaz´ev S. Strategija operezhajushhego razvitija rossijskoj jekonomiki v uslovijah global´nogo krizisa [The strategy of the advanced development of the Russian economy in the global crisis]. Moscow, Jekonomika Publ., 2010. 287 p.

6. Perez C. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages Paperback. 2003. 224 p.

7. Drechsler W., Kattel R. and Reinert E. Techno-Economic Paradigms. Essays in Honour of Carlota Perez. Anthem Press. 2011. 442 p.

8. Tausch A. The Hallmark of Crisis: A New Center-Periphery Perspective on Long Cycles. On Demand Publishing, LLC- Create Space. 2014. 128 p.

9. Andersen E. Techno-economic paradigms as typical interfaces between producers and users. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1991, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 119-144.

10. Basovskaya E., Basovskiy L. Produktivnost´ tekhnologicheskikh ukladov v ekonomike SShA [Productivity of Technological Waves in the USA Economy]. Ekonomika [Economics]. 2015, V. 3, I. 4, pp. 4-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/12772

11. Basovskaya E., Basovskiy L. Produktivnost´ tekhnologicheskikh ukladov v ekonomike Velikobritanii [Productivity of Technological Modes in the Economy of the United Kingdom]. Ekonomika [Economics]. 2015, V. 3, I. 6, pp. 13-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/16671

12. Klimova V.V. Ocenka vozdejstvija jekonomicheskih ukladov na stanovlenie rossijskoj jekonomiki [Assessing the impact of economic structures in the development of the Russian economy]. Jekonomicheskij zhurnal [Economic Journal]. 2010, I. 19, pp. 11-16.

13. Krjukova T.M. Tehnologicheskie uklady kak osnova razvitija obshhestvennogo proizvodstva i innovacionnoj dejatel´nosti putem realizacii promyshlennoj politiki v sovremennyh uslovijah hozjajstvovanija i upravlenija [Technological structures as a basis for the development of social production and innovation through the implementation of industrial policy in the current economic conditions and management]. Trudy Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta im. R.E. Alekseeva [Proceedings of the Nizhny Novgorod State University]. 2015, I. 3, pp. 287-294.

14. Pechonik O.I. Vlijanie norm VTO na vozmozhnosti perehoda APK na novyj tehnologicheskij uklad [Influence of WTO rules on agribusiness opportunities transition to a new technological order]. Problemy prognozirovanija [Problems of Forecasting]. 2014, I. 4, pp. 108-112.

15. Maevskij V. Vvedenie v jevoljucionnuju makrojekonomiku [Introduction to evolutionary macroeconomics]. Moscow, Japonija segodnja Publ. 1997. 106 p.

16. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1942. 381 p.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?