Russian Federation
This article examines the importance of judicial discretion in sentencing. It demonstrates that judicial discretion in sentencing is an objectively necessary element of criminal law regulation, without which individualization of punishment would be impossible. It is noted that the breadth of judicial discretion creates certain problems that, in some cases, may lead to a violation of constitutional guarantees for citizens and demonstrates the need for systematic improvement of the regulatory framework in this area.
punishment, sentencing, judicial discretion, sanction of the article, criminal law
1. Ermakova K.P. Pravovye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. №8 (164). S.50-57.
2. Kruglikov L.L. Differenciaciya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: sootnoshenie so smezhnymi ponyatiyami // Legal Concept. 2017. №3. S.8-13.
3. O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federacii ugolovnogo nakazaniya: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 dekabrya 2015 g. № 58 // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. — 2016. — № 2.
4. Papkova O.A. Usmotrenie suda. — M.: Statut, 2005. — 413 s.
5. Hamitov R.N. Special'nye pravila naznacheniya nakazaniya. — Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo un-ta, 2001. — 166 s.



