The article considers some problems of carrying out control activities by the Russian State over information relations on the Internet. The author notes that the subject mater of the bitter dispute between supporters and detractors of the necessity of enhancement of state participation in information relations, arising on the Internet, is the issues, related to admissible limits of state control. Any strengthening of state control over information relations, arising on the Internet, as well as the necessary introduction of any other restrictive measures is only admissible after the thorough analysis of the proposed novations, monitoring and arranging of public opinion. In his research the author touches upon such problematic aspects as the absence of a unified concept of state control in Russia; difficulties in detecting lawbreakers and bringing them to responsibility for law infringements, committed on the Internet, as well as revealing such infringements; the use of the Internet for the purposes of prevention of infringements and legal education of people.
Internet, cyberspace, information relations, legal regulation, control function.
1. Berkovitz V., Hahn R. W. Cybersecurity: Who’s Watching the Store? URL: http:// www.issues.org/issues/19.3/berkovitz.htm.
2. Coleman K. Cyber Terrorism. Directions Magazine. October 10. 2003. URL: http:// www.directionsmag. com/art icle.php?article_id=432.
3. Bachilo I. L. Pravovaya platforma postroeniya elektronnogo gosudarstva. Informatsionnoe pravo. 2008. № 4.
4. Borodin K. V. Pravovoe regulirovanie rasprostraneniya informatsii v seti Internet v usloviyakh informatsionnoy voyny. Pravo i kiberbezopasnost´. 2014. № 1.
5. Vaganov P. A. Pravovaya zashchita kiberprostranstva v SShA. Pravovedenie. 2006. № 4.
6. Vasil´eva T. V. O soblyudenii avtorskikh prav v epokhu razvitiya vysokikh tekhnologiy. Sovremennoe pravo. 2011. № 5.
7. Vasichkin K. A. Otvetstvennost´ za narushenie intellektual´nykh prav v seti Internet. Zakonodatel´stvo i ekonomika. 2013. № 9.
8. Vlasenko N. A. Krizis prava: problemy i podkhody k resheniyu. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 8.
9. Ivanov S. A. Preodolenie korruptsiogennykh faktorov ugolovnogo zakona: ponyatie i osnovnye metody. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 9.
10. Mel´nikov V. Yu. Pravosoznanie i pravovoe vospitanie lichnosti v demokraticheskom, pravovom gosudarstve. Kul´tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. 2012. № 3.
11. Nozdrachev A. F. Kontrol´: pravovye novelly i nereshennye problemy. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 6.
12. Sytenko G. I., Vilinov A. A. Aktual´nye voprosy regulirovaniya otnosheniy po okhrane avtorskogo i smezhnykh prav v seti Internet. Kul´tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. 2010. № 2.
13. Tarasov A. M. Problemy zakonodatel´nogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennogo kontrolya. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 10.
14. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Kurs administrativnogo prava i protsessa. M., 2005.
15. Chernyshova A. A. Otvetstvennost´ provaydera za narushenie avtorskikh prav v seti Internet. Pravovye voprosy svyazi. 2011. № 1.
16. Chukovskaya E. E., Proksh M. Yu. Ispol´zovanie rezul´tatov tvorcheskoy deyatel´nosti v Internete: vozmozhnyy podkhod k regulirovaniyu. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 2.
