Moskva, Russian Federation
This article provides a systems analysis of the evolution of theoretical approaches to firm dynamic capabilities. The aim of the study is to identify the limitations of classical and synthetic models of dynamic capabilities and to justify the need for a transition to a cognitive-process paradigm. The methodological framework con-sists of methods of systemic, comparative, and critical analysis of scientific concepts, as well as a secondary analysis of empirical data from leading research centers. As a result, the views of foreign and Russian authors are systematized and five key gaps in existing paradigms are identified: ontological, mechanistic, identification, proactivity, and imitation. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a cognitive-process model, where the core of dynamic capabilities is the quality of managerial thinking. The proposed cycle architecture integrates cognitive and process aspects, creating a theoretical foundation for further research into proactive adaptation.
dynamic capabilities, cognitive-process model, managerial thinking, proactive adaptation, theoretical gaps, digital transformation, microfoundations
1. Katkalo V.S. Evolyutsiya teorii strategicheskogo upravleniya [The Evolution of Strategic Management Theory]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2008. 548 p.
2. Orekhova S.V. K voprosu formirovaniya dinamicheskikh sposobnostei firmy [On the issue of developing dynamic capabilities of a firm]. Upravlenets [The Manager]. 2012. No. 5. P. 45-51.
3. Maletova T.S. Sushchnostnoe napolnenie ponyatiya «dinamicheskie sposobnosti» v ramkakh razvitiya kontseptsii dinamicheskikh sposobnostei [The essential content of the concept of "dynamic capabilities" within the development of the dynamic capabilities concept]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo [Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship]. 2020. No. 12. P. 110-114.
4. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 1997. Vol. 18, No. 7. P. 509-533.
5. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 1991. Vol. 17, No. 1. P. 99-120.
6. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982. 454 p.
7. Zollo M., Winter S.G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science. 2002. Vol. 13, No. 3. P. 339-351.
8. Winter S.G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. 2003. Vol. 24, No. 10. P. 991-995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
9. Eisenhardt K.M., Martin J.A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal. 2000. Vol. 21, No. 10-11. P. 1105-1121.
10. Teece D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2007. Vol. 28, No. 13. P. 1319-1350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
11. Teece D.J. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning. 2018. Vol. 51, No. 1. P. 40-49.
12. Helfat C.E., Peteraf M.A. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. 2015. Vol. 36, No. 6. P. 831-850.
13. Hodgkinson G.P., Healey M.P. Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 2011. Vol. 32, No. 13. P. 1500-1516.
14. Weick K.E. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995. 234 p.
15. Oludapo S., Carroll N., Helfert M. Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 2024. Vol. 174. Article 114508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114528
16. Matt C., Hess T., Benlian A. Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2015. Vol. 57, No. 5. P. 339-343.
17. Quantive. 2025 Strategy Management Trends Report. 2025. Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/886208979/Global-State-of-Strategy-by-Quantive
18. Kim W.C., Mauborgne R. Blue Ocean Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2005. 256 p.
19. Vergne J.-P., Durand R. The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence. Journal of Management Studies. 2010. Vol. 47, No. 4. P. 736-759.
20. Boston Consulting Group. Flipping the Odds of Digital Transformation Success. 2020. Available at: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/increasing-odds-of-success-in-digital-transformation (accessed: 18.02.2026).
21. Bain & Company. The Three Common Transformation Talent Mistakes and How to Avoid Them. 2023. Available at: https://www.bain.com/insights/the-three-common-transformation-talent-mistakes-and-how-to-avoid-them/ (accessed: 18.02.2026).
22. Prosci. Top Reasons Why Digital Transformation Fails. n.d. Available at: https://www.prosci.com/blog/top-reasons-why-digital-transformation-fails (accessed: 20.02.2026).
23. McKinsey & Company. Decision making in the age of urgency. 2023. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/decision-making-in-the-age-of-urgency (accessed: 21.02.2026).
24. IDC. Worldwide Digital Transformation Spending Guide. 2020. Available at: https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=IDC_P32575 (accessed: 21.02.2026).
25. Gallup. Why Strengths-Based Workplaces Have the Best Decision-Makers. 2019. Available at: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/264866/why-strengths-based-workplaces-best-decision-makers.aspx?version=print (accessed: 21.02.2026).
26. Rogers B. Why 84% Of Companies Fail at Digital Transformation. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucerogers/2016/01/07/why-84-of-companies-fail-at-digital-transformation/ (accessed: 18.02.2026).
27. Skolkovo. *Issledovanie «Sovremennye praktiki upravleniya proektami 2022-2024»* [Research "Modern Project Management Practices 2022-2024"]. Available at: https://www.skolkovo.ru/researches/issledovanie-sovremennye-praktiki-upravleniya-proektami-2022-2024/ (accessed: 21.02.2026).
28. Harvard Business Review. Executives Fail to Execute Strategy Because They're Too Internally Focused. 2017. Available at: https://hbr.org/2017/11/executives-fail-to-execute-strategy-because-theyre-too-internally-focused (accessed: 18.02.2026).
29. Sber Pro. Era agentnogo II: kak intellektual'nye pomoshchniki menyayut biznes i gosupravlenie [The Era of Agentic AI: How Intelligent Assistants Are Changing Business and Public Administration]. 2026. Available at: https://sber.pro/publication/era-agentnogo-ii-kak-intellektualnie-pomoschniki-menyayut-biznes-i-gosupravlenie/ (accessed: 18.02.2026).
30. The Boston Consulting Group. Rossiya 2025: ot kadrov k talantam [Russia 2025: From Staff to Talent]. Moscow, 2017. 72 p. Available at: https://web-assets.bcg.com/img-src/Russia-2025-report-RUS_tcm9-188275.pdf (accessed: 18.02.2026).
