CONFLICT-OF-LAW REGULATION OF OBLIGATIONS, ARISING FROM FAULTY NEGOTIATIONS OF TREATIES (CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO) IN RUSSIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article covers the questions of comparative analysis of conflict-of-law regulation of obligations, arising from faulty negotiations of treaties in the Russian legislation and the European law. Such regulation is envisaged in article 12221 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in article 12 of the Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II). The author considers conflict-of-law regulation of pre-contractual relations from the point of view of the following aspects: possibility of applying the agreement about the law chosen by the parties to regulate their pre-contractual relations; applying the contractual connecting factor to determine the law applicable to precontractual relations; exploration of other connecting factors applicable to the precontractual relations in case of impossibility to determine the applicable law on the basis of the contractual connecting factor. The author’s conclusion contains the results of the comparative analysis, such as deduction of common and specific features of the Russian and European conflict-of-law regulation of the above-mentioned group of obligations. Also the author offers some recommendations on the improvement of the Russian legislation.

Keywords:
Pre-contractual relations, negotiations, conclusion of a contract, applicable law, Russian legislation, law of the European Union, comparative analysis.
References

1. Najib Hage-Chahine. Culpa in Contrahendo in European Private International Law: Another Look at Article 12 of the Rome II Regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business. 2012. Vol. 32.

2. Precontractual Liability in European Private Law / eds. by J. Cartwright, M. Hesselink. Cambridge, 2009.

3. Asoskov A. V. Reforma razdela VI «Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo» Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF. Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2014. № 2.

4. Vlasova N. V. Mezhdunarodnye kommercheskie dogovory kak sredstva samoregulirovaniya. Kommercheskoe pravo. 2014. № 1.

5. Komarov A. S. Kommentariy k st. 12221. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii chasti tret´ey (postateynyy). 4-e izd. / otv. red. N. I. Marysheva, K. B. Yaroshenko. M., 2014.

6. Mazhorina M. V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya prava mezhdunarodnoy torgovli. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 4.

7. Model´nye pravila evropeyskogo chastnogo prava. Per. s angl. / nauch. red. N. Yu. Rasskazova. M., 2013.

8. Muratova O. V. Rol´ aktov myagkogo prava v regulirovanii kommercheskikh otnosheniy v Evropeyskom Soyuze. Kommercheskoe pravo. 2014. № 1.

9. Otdel´nye vidy obyazatel´stv v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave / pod red. N. G. Doroninoy, I. O. Khlestovoy. M., 2014.

10. Printsipy evropeyskogo dogovornogo prava / per. A. T. Amirova, B. I. Puginskogo. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2005. № 3; № 4.

11. Problemy unifikatsii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: monografiya / otv. red. A. L. Makovskiy, I. O. Khlestova. M., 2012.

12. Unifikatsiya mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v sovremennom mire: sb. st. / pod red. I. O. Khlestovoy. M., 2013.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?