CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR VIOLATION OF THE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION: PROBLEM OF DIFFERENTIATION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article analyzes objective and subjective characteristics of elements of the violation of the right to freedom of worship and religions. In particular, the author investigates disposition of public actions that express obvious disrespect for the society with the aim to insult religious feelings of believers. The author notes timeliness of legislative recognition of this law which is in line with modern development of public relations and foreign best practice. The author calls into question the relevancy of establishing goals as an obligatory element of corpus delicti. The author pays attention to the contentious nature of article 148 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and article 5.26 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences and the absence of the due mechanism to overcome it in the criminal law science. Following the results of the research the author proposes changes to the criminal law to ensure the principle of inevitability of criminal liability and protection of the right to freedom of worship and religions guaranteed by the Constitution.

Keywords:
Criminal law, insult of religious feelings of believers, freedom of worship, public and religious safety, administrative responsibility.
References

1. Batyukova V. E. O sootnoshenii khuliganskogo i ekstremistskogo motivov. Zakon i pravo. 2015. № 3.

2. Bespal´ko V. G. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana religioznykh otnosheniy. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 7.

3. Borisov S. Problemy opredeleniya soderzhaniya i sootnosheniya motivov pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy ekstremistskoy napravlennosti. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 6.

4. Granovskaya R. M. Psikhologiya very. SPb., 2010.

5. Isaeva A. A. Zapret oskorbleniya religioznykh chuvstv veruyushchikh i realizatsiya prav cheloveka: sravnitel´no-pravovoy analiz. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal´noe pravo. 2013. № 4.

6. Karabanova E. N. Osobo pochitaemye simvoly kak ob´´ekt ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany: problemy zakonodatel´nogo regulirovaniya. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2013. № 10.

7. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. red. A. I. Rarog. M., 2014.

8. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 9-e izd. / pod red. V. T. Tomina, V. V. Sverchkova. M., 2013.

9. Machkovskiy L. G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost´ za narushenie ravnopraviya, lichnykh, politicheskikh i sotsial´no-ekonomicheskikh prav. M., 2005.

10. Nurkaeva T. N. Lichnye (grazhdanskie) prava i svobody cheloveka i ikh okhrana ugolovno-pravovymi sredstvami: voprosy teorii i praktiki. SPb., 2003.

11. Osobennaya chast´ Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy, sudebnaya praktika, statistika / otv. red. A. V. Galakhova. M., 2009.

12. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel´stvo Kh-KhKh vekov: v 9 t. T. 9: Zakonodatel´stvo epokhi burzhuazno-demokraticheskikh revolyutsiy / otv. red. O. I. Chistyakov. M., 1994.

13. Serebrennikova A. V. Okhrana svobody veroispovedaniy v Germanii (na primere § 166 UK). Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: mater. 4-y Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2007.

14. Ulozhenie o nakazaniyakh ugolovnykh i ispravitel´nykh / N. S. Tagantsev. M., 2013.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?