The paper presents an innovative method of treating a damaged bone of the skull. Due to the increasing number of vehicles, the development of combat sports sections, worsening crime situation, the number of cases of damage to the maxillofacial region increases. Therefore, the issues of diagnosis and treatment of traumatic lesions of the maxillofacial region are of particular relevance. It is known that bone tissue is capable of physiological regeneration. The osteogenic progenitor cells play an important role in its self-renewal and regene-ration. Aesthetic rehabilitation and restoration of the function of dental system is realized, as a rule, after months in the hospital outpatient dentistry. Aesthetic and functional rehabilitation after traumatic extraction of teeth and alveolar ridge fracture in the late posttraumatic period leads to atrophy of bone tissue in the area of tooth loss. The development of modern implantology and appearance of dental implants that can absorb as much as possible on the surface of stem cells, allow as soon as possible after the injury to install a dental implant. It is shown that the use of the method directly after the injury immediate implantation in combination with biocompatible dental implants can achieve predictable osteointegration, it reduces the probability of post-traumatic bone tissue atrophy, as well as the time and number of operations for the patient. There is the necessity for inclusion in the protocol control operation of local blood circulation and diagnosis of inflammation at the cellular level.
tooth extraction, immediate implantation, alveolar bone.
1. Afanas´ev V.V. Travmatologiya chelyustno-litsevoy oblasti. M.: Izd-vo "GEOTAR-Media", 2010. 256 s.
2. Glauzer R., Khildebrand D. Dostoinstva i nedostatki metoda nemedlennoy implantatsii. No-voe v stomatologii. 2008. T. 151, №3. S. 96-101
3. Grigor´yan A.S., Filonov M.R., Toporkova A.K. Morfologicheskoe issledovanie mekhanizmov osteointegratsii vnutriossal´nykh titanovykh implantatov. Arkhiv patologii. 2008. T. 70, №3. S. 36.
4. Zagorskiy V.A., Robustova T.G. Protezirovanie zubov na implantatakh. M., 2011. 351 s.
5. Kazantseva I.A., Dmitrienko S.V., Rukavishnikova L.I., Fursik T.I., Fursik D.I. Travma po-stoyannykh i molochnykh zubov. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Volgograd, 2001. 24 s.
6. Knorr V. Nemedlennaya implantatsiya v mnogokornevuyu al´veolu. Novoe v stomatologii. 2012. T. 187, №7. S. 40-43.
7. Koen E.S. Atlas kosmeticheskoy i rekonstruktivnoy khirurgii parodonta. M.: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2011. 514 s.
8. Noygebauer Dzh., Bayar Zh., Kistler F., Kistler S. Desyat´ let pervichnoy stabil´nosti i ne-medlennoy nagruzki s Xive. Novoe v stomatologii. 2012. T. 182, №2. S. 48-50
9. Saburina I.N., Kolokol´tsova T.D., Kosheleva N.V., Zurina I.M., Gorkun A.A., Orlov A.A., Ol´khovtsev A.N., Yudin D.A. Issledovanie tsitotoksichnosti stomatologicheskikh implantov Easy Fast S (Ti) i Easy Kon (ZrO2) in vitro. Novoe v stomatologii. 2014. №1. S. 48-52.
10. Berberi A.N., Sabbagh J.M., Aboushelib M.N., Noujeim Z.F., Salameh Z.A. A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla. Frontiers in physiology. 2014. T. 5. R. 29.
