FOREIGN POLICY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE CHALLENGE OF CHINESE OPTION OF DAVID CAMERON
Authors:
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 20
to 24
Status:
Published
Received:
10.03.2016
Accepted:
10.03.2016
Published:
10.03.2016
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
foreign policy of the United Kingdom, international relations, the United States, China.
Abstract (English):
The article reveals and analyses current state of the United Kingdom (UK) foreign policy and its outlook. While London is traditionally (alongside other states of Anglo-Saxon world) considered as a recognized ally and a junior partner of the United States (US), nevertheless, dynamics of international relations since the end of 2000s demonstrates that it cannot be stated with dead certainty. The conclusion based on analyzed evidence is that in spite of taken steps and efforts, and measures implemented in recent years, and declarations of British authorities, in fact London tends to pursue diversification of its foreign policy. Meanwhile, it cannot be said that it’s smooth and seamless process. It’s being criticized by Washington. But the White House lacks tools to influence the UK’s position. In the meantime, nowadays London faces serious challenges, and cooperation with Washington is not a priority. The reason, in part, is driven by the fact that US administration has nothing new to offer and cannot provide security. Also, the United States pursue their own interests at the expenses of interests of their partners more often and in more uncovered way. This implies search of new foreign policy options. Currently, the most burning foreign policy problems for the Conservative government of David Cameron are the relations with European Union (EU) in view of the plans to hold referendum on whether or not to remain a member of the European Union and the relations with China and Asian countries. At the same time for London it is necessary to keep good relations with American administration regardless of its partisan views and political affiliation.
The article reveals and analyses current state of the United Kingdom (UK) foreign policy and its outlook. While London is traditionally (alongside other states of Anglo-Saxon world) considered as a recognized ally and a junior partner of the United States (US), nevertheless, dynamics of international relations since the end of 2000s demonstrates that it cannot be stated with dead certainty. The conclusion based on analyzed evidence is that in spite of taken steps and efforts, and measures implemented in recent years, and declarations of British authorities, in fact London tends to pursue diversification of its foreign policy. Meanwhile, it cannot be said that it’s smooth and seamless process. It’s being criticized by Washington. But the White House lacks tools to influence the UK’s position. In the meantime, nowadays London faces serious challenges, and cooperation with Washington is not a priority. The reason, in part, is driven by the fact that US administration has nothing new to offer and cannot provide security. Also, the United States pursue their own interests at the expenses of interests of their partners more often and in more uncovered way. This implies search of new foreign policy options. Currently, the most burning foreign policy problems for the Conservative government of David Cameron are the relations with European Union (EU) in view of the plans to hold referendum on whether or not to remain a member of the European Union and the relations with China and Asian countries. At the same time for London it is necessary to keep good relations with American administration regardless of its partisan views and political affiliation.
Keywords:
foreign policy of the United Kingdom, international relations, the United States, China.
foreign policy of the United Kingdom, international relations, the United States, China.
1. Europe’s costly judgment on data protection. Financial Times. 8.10.2015, p. 14.
2. Fukuyama F. Amerika na rasput’e: Demokratiya, vlast’ i neokonservativnoe nasledie [America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy]. Мoscow, AST Publ., 2007. 282 p.
3. Dyer G. US attacks UK over China stance. Financial Times. 13.03.2015, p. 1.
4. Bergsten F. America should work from the inside with China’s new development bank. Financial Times. 16.03.2015, p. 15.
5. Moore E. People’s Bank completes fi rst London debt sale. Financial Times. 21.10.2015, p. 28.
6. Shipman T. George’s great trawl of China. The Sunday Times. 18.10.2015, p. 17.
7. The giant Chinese takeaway. The Sunday Times. 18.10.2015, p. 20.
