Introduction. The paper presents a possible approach to the assessment of the probability of omission the equipment failure, which is controlled by the monitoring system, considering the influence of a human factor (as a managing part of a monitoring system) on monitoring results. The aim of this paper is a selection and assessment of those components of the human factors that affect the likelihood of failure in modern monitoring systems. Method. The components of human errors and their probabilities in the management of industrial complex have been analyzed using the approaches and data for assessing the nuclear power plants personnel reliability. The data included the reliability of information perception, decision-making, executive actions of the operator, and others. Results. The probability of hazardous equipment state omission by a monitoring system has been assessed on the basis of abovementioned data analysis; the system meets the requirements of GOST R 53563, GOST R 53564 and represents a system of the First class. Conclusion. The provided data show that it is possible to assess the probability of hazardous equipment state omission, taking into account the static and dynamic monitoring system errors and the human factor influence. The advanced achievements in the fields of engineering psychology, art design of information support systems, support systems for situation assessment, decision making and implementing, as well as the achievements in the field of equipment condition monitoring in various industries are the basis for the assessment.
risks, monitoring, diagnostics, technical condition, human factor
1. Vetoshkin A. G. Nadezhnost´ tekhnicheskikh sistem i tekhnogennyy risk [Engineering Systems Reliability and Techology-related Risk]. Penza, PGUAiS Publ., 2003, 155 p. (in Russ.).
2. GOST R 53564-2009. Kontrol´ sostoyaniya i diagnostika mashin. Monitoring sostoyaniya oborudovaniya opasnykh proizvodstv. Trebovaniya k sistemam monitoring [Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines. Hazardous equipment monitoring. Requirements for monitoring systems]. Moscow, STANDARTINFORM, 2010. 20 p. (in Russ.).
3. STO 03-002-08. Monitoring opasnykh proizvodstv. Terminy i opredeleniya. Standart NPS «RISKOM». Ser. 03 [Hazardous equipment monitoring. Terms and definitions. Standard of NPS “RISKOM”. Ser. 3]. In: Monitoring oborudovaniya opasnykh proizvodstv. Standart organizatsii [Hazardous equipment monitoring. Company’s standard]. Moscow, NPS «RISKOM», 2008, pp. 5-24 (in Russ.).
4. GOST R 53563-2009. Kontrol´ sostoyaniya i diagnostika mashin. Monitoring sostoyaniya oborudovaniya opasnykh proizvodstv. Poryadok organizatsii [Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines. Hazardous equipment monitoring. Organizational procedures]. Moscow, STANDARTINFORM, 2010, 8 p. (in Russ.).
5. Kostyukov V. N. Monitoring bezopasnosti proizvodstva [Production Safety Monitoring]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 2002, 224 p. (in Russ.).
6. Kostyukov V. N. Naumenko A. P. Dinamika sistem, mekhanizmov i mashin [Dynamics of System, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics)]. 2014, no. 4, pp. 150-154 (in Russ.).
7. Kostyukov V. N., Kostyukov A. V. Povyshenie operatsionnoy effektivnosti predpriyatiy na osnove monitoringa v real´nom vremeni [Improving Companies’ Operational Efficiency on the Basis of Real-Time Monitoring]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 2009, 192 p. (in Russ.).
8. Kostyukov V. N., Boychenko S. N., Naumenko A. P. et al. Ezhemesyachnyy nauchno-tekhnicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal [Monthly Scientific and Technical e-Journal]. 2014, no. 3, pp. 30-44 (in Russ.) (URL: www.energo-press.info).
9. Anokhin A. N., Ostreykovskiy V. A. Voprosy ergonomiki v yadernoy energetike [Questions of Ergonomics in the Nuclear Power Industry]. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 2001, 344 p. (in Russ.).
10. GOST R IEC 62508-2014. Menedzhment riska. Analiz vliyaniya na nadezhnost´ chelovecheskogo faktora [Risk management. Impact analysis to dependability of human aspects]. Moscow, STANDARTINFORM, 2015, 45 p. (in Russ.).
11. Adamenko A. N., Asherov A. T., Berdnikov I. L. et al. Informatsionno-upravlyayushchie cheloveko-mashinnye sistemy. Issledovanie, proektirovanie, ispytaniya. Spravochnik [Information-Management Man-Machine Systems. Research, Design, Testing. Handbook]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1993, 528 p. (in Russ.).
12. Ostreykovskiy V. A. Teoriya nadezhnosti [Reliability Theory]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 2003, 463 p. (in Russ.).
13. Swain A. D., Guttmann H. E. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Application (NUREG/CR-1278). Springfield, National Technical Information Service, 1983, 728 p.
14. Bello G. C., Colombari V. The Human Factors in Risk Analysis of Process Plant: the Control Room Operator Model «TESEO». Reliability Engineering, 1985, vol. 1, pp. 3-14.
15. Ostreykovskiy V. A., Shvyryaev Yu. V. Bezopasnost´ atomnykh stantsiy. Veroyatnostnyy analiz [Safety of Nuclear Power Plants. Probabilistic Analysis]. Moscow, FIZMATLIT, 2008, 352 p. (in Russ.).
16. Derevyankin A. A. Issledovanie, razrabotka i primenenie metodov otsenki nadezhnosti personala pri provedenii veroyatnostnogo analiza bezopasnosti atomnykh stantsiy. Avtoref. dis. kand. tekhn. nauk [Research, Development and Application of Staff Reliability Assessment Methods at Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants. Synopsis of Cand. Eng. Sci. Diss.]. Moscow, 1991, 26 p. (in Russ.).
17. Kostyukov V. N., Boychenko S. N., Kostyukov A. V. Avtomatizirovannye sistemy upravleniya bezopasnoy resursosberegayushchey ekspluatatsiey oborudovaniya neftepererabatyvayushchikh i neftekhimicheskikh proizvodstv (ASU BER-KOMPAKS®) [Automated Control Systems of Safe Resource-Saving Equipment Operation at Oil-Refining and Petrochemical Plants (ASU BER-KOMPAKS®)]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1999, 163 p. (in Russ.).
18. Kostyukov V. N., Naumenko A. P. Neftepererabotka i neftekhimiya [Oil-processing and Petrochemistry]. 2006, no. 10, pp. 38-47 (in Russ.).
19. Kostyukov V. N., Naumenko A. P. Kompressornaya tekhnika i pnevmatika [Compressors & Pneumatics]. 2011, no. 5, pp. 31-36 (in Russ.).
