The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the concept, types and forms of Eurasian and Latin-American integration associations. On the authors’ mind the integration association is the group of states united on the basis of an international treaty to achieve the integration goals. It is proposed to distinguish between the integration associations of the coordination and supranational types. According to the identified features of each of the indicated types of integration associations the authors conclude that the Organization of American States is the union of the coordination type, the MERCOSUR is in transition from coordination to supranational integration association, in the Andean Community the supranational model is implemented, and the Eurasian Economic Union tends to the supranational association. It is noted that integration associations can be also classified depending on the different forms of economic integration (free trade area, customs union, common market, economic union, etc.). The main forms of the Latin-American economic integration are free trade area and customs union, while the common market is still developing. The forms of the Eurasian economic integration are the customs union, the common economic space, forming common market. A trend of formation of new forms and types of inter-state integration associations and cooperation between them, particularly in the form of a mega-association (Union of South American Nations) is revealed. The ways of further development of the integration associations in Latin America and Eurasia are marked.
Integration, coordination association, supranational association, customs union, common market, free trade area, economic union, common economic space, the Organization of American States, the MERCOSUR, the Andean Community, the Carribean Community, Union of South American Nations, Free Trade Area For Americas, the Eurasian Economic Union.
1. Alfonso González Núñez. Parlamentario Del Mercosur, Presidente Delegación Paraguay. Supranacionalidad Efectiva Reparará Imperfecciones Del Mercosur. URL: http://www.parlamentodelmercosur.org/innovaportal/file/7252/1/supranacionalidad-reparara--imperfecciones-del-mercosur.pdf.
2. Engaña C. Derechos humanos y empresas: una relación dificil. De la oposición a la convergencia. Cuadernos de Epoca, Serie Integración Económica. Buenos Aires; Madrid, 2001.
3. Hechos clave en las relaciones CAN - MERCOSUR. URL: http://www.comunidadandina.org/Seccion.aspx?id=111&;tipo=TE&title=mercosur.
4. Marcelo Rozas Garay. UNASUR - Un nuevo modelo de cooperación e integración. URL: http://www.mercojuris.com/category/doctrina/?id=8110.
5. Martínez Puñal A. El Sistema Institucional del Mercosur: de la intergubernamentalidad hacia la supranacionalidad. Santiago de Compostela, 2005.
6. Avdeeva T. G., Aleshin V. V., Ashavskiy B. M. i dr. Slovar´ mezhdunarodnogo prava / otv. red. S. A. Egorov. 3-e izd. M., 2014.
7. Busurmanov Zh. D. Evraziyskaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka i narodov - poisk razresheniya mezhtsivilizatsionnykh protivorechiy. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel´stva i sravnitel´nogo pravovedeniya. 2015. № 3.
8. Busurmanov Zh. D. Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz kak novaya gumanisticheskaya tsennost´. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel´stva i sravnitel´nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. № 4.
9. Valeev R. M., Kurdyukov G. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast´. M., 2010.
10. Vlasova N. V., Gracheva S. A., Meshcheryakova M. A. i dr. Pravovoe prostranstvo i chelovek: monografiya / otv. red. Yu. A. Tikhomirov, E. V. Pulyaeva, N. I. Khludeneva. M., 2012.
11. Voprosy i otvety po Soglasheniyu o svobodnoy torgovle mezhdu Evraziyskim ekonomicheskim soyuzom i Sotsialisticheskoy Respublikoy V´etnam. URL: http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/trade/dotp/sogl_torg/Documents/Voprosy%20i%20ot-vety%20po%20Soglasheniyu%20o%20svobodnoy%20torgovle%20mezhdu%20stranami%20EAES%20i%20V´;etnamom.pdf.
12. D´yachenko E. B., Myslivskiy P. P., Neshataeva T. N. Evraziyskaya integratsiya: rol´ Suda / pod red. T. N. Neshataevoy. M., 2015.
13. Iz vystupleniya Alaka Khulio Sezara, ministra yustitsii i prav cheloveka Respubliki Argentiny, na Peterburgskom yuridicheskom forume v 2015 g. URL: http://www.spblegalforum.ru/spilf2015/Satellite?pagename=LF/Article/AArticleTplContentPage&;cid=1418988805952&.
14. Kapustin A. Ya. Dogovor o Evraziyskom ekonomicheskom soyuze - novaya stranitsa pravovogo razvitiya evraziyskoy integratsii. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 12.
15. Kashirkina A. A., Morozov A. N. Rossiya, Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz i Vsemirnaya torgovaya organizatsiya: monografiya. M., 2014.
16. Kashirkina A. A., Morozov A. N. Formatsii pravovogo razvitiya evraziyskoy integratsii i ikh vliyanie na pravovuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 8.
17. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava: v 7 t. T. 7: Bardina M. P., Voytovich S. A., Kolosov Yu. M. i dr. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye formy integratsionnykh protsessov v sovremennom mire. M., 1993.
18. Liventsev N. N., Kostyunina G. M. Integratsiya v Latinskoy Amerike. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya. M., 2006.
19. Naryshkin S. E., Khabrieva T. Ya. K novomu parlamentskomu izmereniyu evraziyskoy integratsii. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 8.
20. Rafael´ Al´berto Patrignani. ALKA i MERKOSUR v integratsionnykh protsessakh Latinskoy Ameriki. URL: www.observer.materik.ru/observer/N12_2006/101_107.pdf.
21. Shabalov P. Ne soshlis´ kharakterami. Vseamerikanskoy zony svobodnoy torgovli poka ne budet. Trud. 2005. № 207.
22. Shibaeva E. A. Pravo mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: voprosy teorii. M., 1986.
